Miracle Pete

I find it stunning that you, Georgie, have apparently NEVER thought to apply that counsel to yourself, first .…. or at all! 
THAT is why, in my not-so-humble-opinion, the title of “Vicar of Warwick”, fits.
You try to elevate yourself by denigrating others, totally unaware of the cluelessness and hypocrisy you display like a badge of office.
You whine constantly about everybody here … yet, here you are!
… yet … here you are ….
 

Then what’s a ‘ true follower ’ like you, doing here?
 

Then what’s a ‘ true follower ’ like you, doing here?
 

Just to be clear, you hope I’m a sadistic animal ? Strange hope. 

Just to be clear, you hope I’m a sadistic animal ? Strange hope. 

..

AND THEN… and THEN!,  In the imagined context he had to hunt for as the 5th down definition on Wikipedia which “he”  finds SO OUTRAGEOUSLY OFFENSIVE, “he” uses THAT definition to insult others!
wow!

..

Or to put it a little more succinctly as we say in the UK , He’s a bit of a nob 

Or to put it a little more succinctly as we say in the UK , He’s a bit of a nob 

I guess the problem is, if everyone is banned as you suggest, it would just be you and your numerous aliases/ imaginary friends talking to and upvoting each other or in other words you telling yourself how great you are. It’s must be depressing enough as it is. That would be spectacularly tragic. 

@BTK59 ( @George88 ) ( @BillyTheKid-55 ) ( @Allen Smith ) ( @AllenSmith35 ), etc., etc., etc., etc. --
and @Pudgy ( @James Thomas Rook Jr. ),
I once got in trouble from an Admin here for revealing that @TrueTomHarley was from Rochester, based on the assumption that I had used a moderator's ability to read I.P. addresses. I got out of trouble by showing that TTH had himself made posts claiming he was from Rochester.
It is considered very bad forum etiquette to reveal information or attempt to reveal personal information about a forum participant that isn't something they bring up about themselves. If it is specifically to reveal something negative, it is clearly malicious. Because it also goes against the rules of the forum, BTK59 and his cohorts might end up getting banned. I don't want to see BTK banned, for all the reasons I've stated before: 
Banning is meaningless on a forum like this one, because anyone can come back under a different name. Banning is a form of shunning, which can have serious and unintended psychological consequences. Banning can involve erasing all of a person's writing here, into which they may have put a lot of time and research. Banning a person who shows signs of maliciousness and viciousness and paranoia usually will motivate the person to come back only to seek vengeance on everyone they think was involved in their "excommunication" or "disfellowshipping" from the forum. In practice that has meant attacks on persons who were not even interested in the matter.  So, for these reasons, I recommend the following so that BTK and cohorts are not banned. I recommend that the posts related to the malicious attempt to expose personal legal issues and troubles be removed.
I will remove all related posts within 24 hours, unless both parties to this matter request that they remain. 

You know … even Japan gave up after two atomic bombs. Best decision they made in 4,000 years.
 

Having absolutely no observable sense of humor whatsoever, Georgie, humor and satire are totally unknown to you. 
Hitler had the same observation when Berlin was beseiged by English, French, American and Russian forces from all sides …
”You know, Steiner, those Allied Forces have absolutely NO sense of humor …”

Which of your life story is Alphonso and which is George88 not to mention BTK or whatever your other aliases are. 
‘ my life story is rich and complex’  is a statement that could only be uttered by a raging egocentric. 
do you have ‘ many leather bound books in your library’ and does it smell like ‘ rich mahogany’ ?

Where is BTK? Is he deep in thought or in the lavatory? Or both? 

Where is BTK? Is he deep in thought or in the lavatory? Or both? 

Do you think i could capture the essence of it? Remember, when I write of myself, I am full of self-deprecatory humor. Would that work for you?

… fine Corinthian leather?

Everything you have just said, Georgie, is based on false premises, and personal delusion, and predilection for irrelevancy.
Do you even READ this stuff after you write it?
 

Actually, I have never seen a person who worked so hard to prove someone wrong, but at the same time, inadvertently confirm that what I have been presenting here is relatively accurate -- so far. Given time, and given the amount of effort you evidently put into finding fault, I assume that someday you really will find something that I am presenting incorrectly, and then I'll be able to learn something useful from it and make the necessary correction. In the past, under other names, you've presented some resource material I hadn't seen before, and I found it very interesting. I'm a patient person. Happy to keep waiting for something useful again. Even if it means putting with all those lies and nonsense from you about banning persons. I'm also happy for the entertainment value, and revelations about human nature, etc. 
Even if you don't come through again. I have no interest in banning you, nor do I even know for sure if I have that authority as an assigned moderator. If I do have that ability, I have never used it.

Can I just check if both of you have blocked me or just this identity? You really should write a book someday. Wow. I’m speechless. 

I’m fairly new here but this is the same person talking to themselves isn’t it? Hilarious. Very very weird but hilarious. 

Yeah … he also has other logins to upvote himself and other logins to downvote others …
…. he thinks no one notices ….

I’m fairly new here but this is the same person talking to themselves isn’t it? Hilarious. Very very weird but hilarious.