Moise Racette

It is good to see your efforts to correct apostate ideology. I will agree with this part of the post. Now if this poster can affirm its own suggestion, then perhaps a good biblical discussion can be had.

If the poster fails to understand the meaning of hope along with the readers, this might encourage that wisdom. The Thessalonians’ Faith and Example 1 Thessalonians 1:2 3 remembering before four God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ

This was an opinion of a poster. However, when misrepresentation of scripture is at hand, no one should be without defense of God's word. False prophets have no enlightenment, just darkness.

The poster (Prophet) brings enlightenment through the eyes of cynicism. Contrary to the works of Christ in HOPE. (Ecclesiastes 9:1-3) 9 So I took all of this to heart and concluded that the righteous and the wise, as well as their works, are in the hands of the true God. Men are not aware of the love and the hate that took place prior to them. 2 All have the very same outcome, the righteous and the wicked, the good and the clean and the unclean, those sacrificing and those not sacrificing. The good one is the same as the sinner; the one who swears an oath is the same as the one who is cautious about swearing an oath. 3 This is a distressing thing that happens under the sun: Because all have the same outcome, the heart of humans is also full of bad; and there is madness in their heart during their life, and then they die. . . It is through repentance that we gain reasoning and wisdom to the words of God. . 20 And after observing him closely, they sent men whom they had secretly hired to pretend that they were righteous in order to catch him in his speech, so as to turn him over to the government and to the authority of the governor. 21 And they questioned him, saying: “Teacher, we know you speak and teach correctly and show no partiality, but you teach the way of God in line with truth: 22 Is it lawful for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?” 23 But he detected their cunning and said to them: 24 “Show me a de·narʹi·us. Whose image and inscription does it have?” They said: “Caesar’s.” 25 He said to them: “By all means, then, pay back Caesar’s things to Caesar but God’s things to God.” 26 Well, they were not able to trap him in his speech before the people, but amazed at his answer, they became silent. Darkness cannot overcome darkness.

It is very simple to see how the poster misunderstands not only scripture, but its interpretation of scripture. No human entity will ever see God in his glory or otherwise. A simple distinction by the error of the poster can be found in Exodus 33:20

Thank you poster. My mission here is to defend scripture when it is misapplied. Having to deal with apostates is unconventional, but if we allow their distorted rhetoric to go unchecked, the reader would only see one side. I understand your frustration.

Better. Just don't confuse the context, poster!

Remember @Witness, your fighting an uphill battle, but I'll give you a hint on how the Jewish Nation thinks with this: 11:26 - All Israel Will Be Saved? Rom 11:26 has been at the heart of much Christian reflection about eschatology or doctrines about end times. I remember well the interpretation given this text by one of my college teachers. According to his eschatological timeline, the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, which ended an almost two-thousand-year period without nationhood, inaugurated the final days of "the time of the Gentiles," namely that period when the land of Israel was occupied by Gentiles. (from Hard Sayings of the Bible)

Thank You Ann, you to!

This statement is inconsistent The phrase "of the nations" is linear. Appointed period of time, to all the nations, etc.

Like I said, not that the poster has answered the question in any sensible way, but is now distorting scripture. I will ask the poster to justify the following: (Romans 11:25-27) 25 For I do not want you to be unaware of this sacred secret, brothers, so that you do not become wise in your own eyes: A partial dulling of senses has come upon Israel until the full number of people of the nations has come in, 26 and in this manner all Israel will be saved. Just as it is written: “The deliverer will come out of Zion and turn away ungodly practices from Jacob. 27 And this is my covenant with them, when I take their sins away. . . Personal opinions don't matter when it comes to a serious bible discussion.

Where are these anointed being gathered from, or does the poster have a different theory on how, the holy priest have already been gathered and are in heaven? One point of discussion with the text cited by the poster. 1 Peter 2:5 Let's not inflate the discussion with lengthy wording, your not impressing me with long answers. Stick to bible understanding if the poster can.

I agree with this poster. Viewers should reject the empty posts coming from this poster.

Keep in mind @Witness. You will have to prove why you are stubbornly "removing" from scripture this adaptation. The poster is fighting an uphill battle. Luke 21:23-24 NIV 23 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people. 24 They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled. Even to the nation of modern day Israel, they believe it happened in 1917 with the Belfour Declaration. A reason they hold 1947/8 and 1967/8 significant to them. Therefore, this poster is playing with words. Gentile Times vs Times of the Gentiles. Prove that, 1914 war wasn't part of that gentile fulfilment?

I think this poster has become morally bankrupt. This poster has no indication of wanting to search for the truth, just post. A Poorman's disciple to the devil.

Does this poster intend to conclude, just because scripture doesn't specifically state gentile times, that it doesn't exist? This only confirms, how the poster misrepresents articles, nothing more. If you wish to have an intellectual bible discussion, by all means, lets have one, without distorting facts and scripture. Remember, the posters interpretation of scripture, lacks reasoning and wisdom.

I see the poster cannot answer the poster's absolute comment, thus nullifying the poster's intent to warn others of the false interpretation by the poster. Yet, the poster confuses the meaning of 1914 with the hour and day Jesus mentioned, that no one knows. 1914 was NOT meant to be seen as judgment day, but an end to the gentile times, when the Jews would, once again, reconstruct themselves free from gentile tyranny. Unless this poster is willing to factually understand the meaning of 1914, the signs that have accompanied, 1914 after, is a good indicator of man's worsting? This poster continues in a path of deceit for the audience.

How can the poster confirm this? Simple question, how about an answer. If the poster is going to be absolute, then the poster has proof.

If it was just for the sake of the number, then this would present a problem for, bible understanding. (1 Kings 10:14, 15) 14 And the weight of the gold that came to Solʹo·mon in one year amounted to 666 talents of gold, 15 besides that from the merchants and the profit from the traders and from all the kings of the Arabs and the governors of the land. (2 Chronicles 9:13, 14) 13 And the weight of the gold that came to Solʹo·mon in one year amounted to 666 talents of gold, 14 besides that brought in by the merchants and the traders and all the kings of the Arabs and the governors of the land who were bringing gold and silver in to Solʹo·. . . (Ezra 2:2-14) . . .The number of the Israelite men included: 3 the sons of Paʹrosh, 2,172; 4 the sons of Sheph·a·tiʹah, 372; 5 the sons of Aʹrah, 775; 6 the sons of Paʹhath-moʹab, of the sons of Jeshʹu·a and Joʹab, 2,812; 7 the sons of Eʹlam, 1,254; 8 the sons of Zatʹtu, 945; 9 the sons of Zacʹcai, 760; 10 the sons of Baʹni, 642; 11 the sons of Beʹbai, 623; 12 the sons of Azʹgad, 1,222; 13 the sons of Ad·o·niʹkam, 666; 14 the sons of Bigʹvai, 2,056;

I would have to say by this comment, that apostates are the ones being influenced by the mark 666, NOT god's organization, since that would entail Christ being a false prophet all along according to this poster misconception. Therefore, that mark is a measure of things to come as a downfall for humanity. I will agree on the last part of this poster. Readers should not be deceived by apostate views and understanding.

It is time for this poster accept the truth found in the N.T. under the guidance of Christ. Now, the poster is just making things up for argument sake.

If the poster was around in the time of Moses, Moses would be referencing such wicked tents of the poster. It doesn't matter, poster, the message is still coming from a wicked one.

Jesus gave no personal authority that God holds for judgment, and if he is sending messengers with corrupt knowledge of scripture, then this poster is supporting the wrong Jesus. The corrective measures that are taken for a unrepentant sinner belongs to the Elders and Congregation as a whole.

I see the poster cannot in all conscience make a good argument on why the posters message should be considered. There is nothing the poster has boosted as an argument that an apostate has delivered in such an unconvincing way. Once again, this posters lamentation should not be followed by any reader.

What is the poster suggesting by this comment? That God is imperfect in the eyes of the poster? The poster vacates the premise with excuses. The same structure is seen with today's spiritual leaders. It was lost for millennia, and returned after the reformation. A more concise structure was reverted to its original intent after the 19th century. The Apostles became the correct framers for that spiritual structure. Therefore, the poster is elevating the Pharisees and schools of thought over God's word.