Moise Racette

Moise: here is a test for you.
I call it the “Bluster Test”, named after Phineas T. Bluster, the marionette Mayor of Doodyville, home of Howdy Doody, of TV fame in the 1950’s. (reference video on YouTube, if interested …)
You have specifically accused me of “exploitation of scripture”.
The burden of proof is yours. 
Specifically, what scriptures have I exploited, and how does one even “exploit a scripture”?

That’s not an attack, merely an observation.

You obviously have not actually READ the text on the chart.

Not defending your accusations with fact is the classic definition of “Bluster”.

Coincidentally, he looks just like his twin brother, Cluster Bluster. You can use his photo.

(  …. Visualizes Moise thinking to himself …””I don’t think we are in Kansas anymore, Toto ….”)

It is good to know, you are @Witness and a former member. The bluster comes from none intellectual cartoons and comments by the poster. However, you seem to renege on your assertions by commenting, and indeed wish to only fight, making the poster's comments meaningless by the poster's own standards, thus your ignorance is your own poster. What, did the poster mention, about ridicule? The poster's words no longer have any value.
First, learn to understand a chart that is displayed. If a person was 20 in 1914 and lived to be 90, it would bring that generation to 1984. If a person is 20 in 1984 and lives to be 90, then it brings a person to 2054.
In the event people don't understand, generations or overlapping generation, posters have no business making up their own assumptions.

I recommend the poster start a new topic and have fights by himself, since it appears understanding comprehension on "examples" escape the poster.

If anyone wishes to divert this topic to generations, I propose a new topic be generated, or it can go into JW closed club where hypocrisy can be challenged and discussed by individuals wishing to understand scripture from a standpoint of their own human failure in understanding.

Intellectually speaking, It would seem to some. Therefore, how comments are framed and agreed upon by their emojis, consideration is drawn. Post after post to distract doesn't change the comment, nor it's intent.

Only when the poster starts using it correctly with intelligence.😂

By definition, an apostate is an immoral person. It goes toward the character of a person.
Adjective immoral - /ɪmˈɔɹəl/
1 Deliberately violating accepted principles of right and wrong
2 Not adhering to ethical or moral principles
Cheating is immoral
The investigation found immoral practices in handling public funds
They considered communism immoral
Thesaurus Synonym base Antonym moral Attribute morality Derived immorality Similar debauched degenerate degraded disgraceful dissipated dissolute fast libertine profligate riotous scandalous scrofulous shameful shocking wrong See also amoral evil non-moral unchaste unrighteous wicked
Something else that hasn't been discussed in the news is, were these two individuals actually baptized publishers or unbaptized publishers (associates). News media don't make that kind of distinction. They just assume, just because a person attends a church, they are dedicated church members.
The point is, it's a tragedy regardless of what their motives might have been.

This just tells me, you don't read posts very well, and just wish to be combative. Read it again. This time, try glasses. You'll find, I was directing my thought about the poster "WITNESS", as a person of interest when it comes to scriptural viewpoints.
I don't care about your viewpoints, since you have no real intellectual ones to offer.

Hmm! What makes you think that person hasn't? Or can it be just another trap. 🤣

Unfortunately, you have no facts to back up your illogical false claims, other than try, to equate them with unsound thoughts. That just means, the poster is not a good debater, just a hater.

Hmm! What makes you think that person hasn't? Or can it be just another trap. 🤣

Unfortunately, you have no facts to back up your illogical false claims, other than try, to equate them with unsound thoughts. That just means, the poster is not a good debater, just a hater.

I’m with you on that ungrateful relative situation! Too many times I, also, have taken a ‘down and out’ woman into my home, only to be shocked at how they take advantage of it or have standards that I can’t handle in my home.

We all have our strengths, weaknesses, idiosyncrasies. You rather remind of “the Sons of Thunder” whom Jesus chose to be among the 12: James & John.

*** Insight, Vol. 2, p.91 ***
“Early in their ministry as apostles, Jesus gave the surname Boanerges (meaning “Sons of Thunder”) to John and his brother James. (Mr 3:17) This title certainly does not denote any soft sentimentality or lack of vigor but, rather, dynamism of personality. When a Samaritan village refused to receive Jesus, these “Sons of Thunder” were ready to call down fire from heaven to annihilate its inhabitants. Previously, John had tried to prevent a man from expelling demons in Jesus’ name. Jesus gave reproof and correction in each case.—Lu 9:49-56.
The two brothers on those occasions showed misunderstanding and, to a great extent, lacked the balance and the loving, merciful spirit that they later developed. Nevertheless, on these two occasions the brothers manifested a spirit of loyalty and a decisive, vigorous personality that, channeled in the right direction, made them strong, energetic, faithful witnesses. James died a martyr’s death at the hands of Herod Agrippa I (Ac 12:1, 2), and John endured as a pillar “in the tribulation and kingdom and endurance in company with Jesus” as the last living apostle.—Re 1:9.
When James and John apparently got their mother to request that they sit next to Christ in his Kingdom, they demonstrated an ambitious spirit that made the other apostles indignant. But it afforded Jesus a fine opportunity to explain that the one great among them would be the one who served the others. Then he pointed out that even He came to minister and to give his life a ransom for many. (Mt 20:20-28; Mr 10:35-45) However selfish their desire was, the incident reveals their faith in the reality of the Kingdom.“
Plus you provide more laughs than a barrel of monkeys. And don’t we need that in these ‘critical times hard to deal with?!
😱😭🤕🙏   😂😂🤣🤣

I fully agree.
But is it kindness to allow a brother in your home who spits on you and the other guests, taking advantage of the scriptural counsel exercised by others to ignore it themself?
I think not.
Three years ago  I took a relative into my home to live rent free after her eviction, and as I sat in a chair she chewed me out for 2-1/2 hours about things she didn’t like. I even got 10 minutes of how I was so smug, not reacting to her complaints.
She thought because I loved her she had an inalienable RIGHT to be there.
I gave her three days to find another place and leave. She refused to go. I had a police officer explain it to her. 
All you have quoted is completely valid, Amidtheroses, but there is more to everything than just that …. usually.
 

Your wish is senseless. I have no agenda.
I am not debating anyones’ viewpoint BUT MY OWN, which when I get new facts, will change.
About 11 years ago I caught myself saying in discussions about Superman “Superman said this” or “Superman did that…”, or “Kal-El did this or that”, etc. with others who were doing the same thing, and  realized I was starting to think in patterns of “Well, you know, perhaps the Neutrinos from our Sun gave Superman his super powers ….”.
Since then I always in a debate about fantasies start out  specifying that we are debating fictional ideas.  “ The CHARACTER Superman had a dog named Krypto, etc.”
There is even an error in that last sentence, but it one point it all becomes too cumbersome.
Abjuring agenda driven thinking is hard work.
 

Shouldn't it be Noisy, Anna?  😁 But, given the response from the poster, it must be all true. Isn't it "Thinking." 😄

Good point. Whatever it is.

If you want to have a happy life, and most people do, it seems, Moise, that your being here does not contribute to that.
I would recommend that during periods of depression and loneliness that you take up Skydiving.
I did, and I guarantee it will work.
If the parachute doesn’t open, your next jump is FREE!

No, it just means he's Noisy Raclette now.