Dmitar

Can you explain this, since anyone can react and be compulsive to send out literature or letters? How does God's spirit play a role in such a simple task? I personally receive pamphlets from a local church on my doorsteps regularly. I receive postcards from religious organizations regularly. Are you suggesting God's Holy Spirit is at play, even though some of those institutions don't have a clear understanding of scripture? What is the message that should play a role and how God's Spirit inspires the writer on that message. Being contradicting and argumentative is not a message that is in God's spirit. Orderly Worship 26 What then, brothers? When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation. Let all things be done for building up. 27 If any speak in a tongue, let there be only two or at most three, and each in turn, and let someone interpret. 28 But if there is no one to interpret, let each of them keep silent in church and speak to himself and to God. 29 Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. 30 If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. 31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, 32 and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. 33 For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints,

Can you expand on your thought here? It appears there is some difficulty in understanding the word suicide. Matthew 27 New International Version Judas Hangs Himself 27 Early in the morning, all the chief priests and the elders of the people made their plans how to have Jesus executed. 2 So they bound him, led him away and handed him over to Pilate the governor. 3 When Judas, who had betrayed him, saw that Jesus was condemned, he was seized with remorse and returned the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders. 4 “I have sinned,” he said, “for I have betrayed innocent blood.”

It appears there is at least one member of that status here as this former member. Can you explain what is the difference to a conscience oriented Christian, since you are one of those that degrade this organization, yet you don't do the same about that individual?

Can you expand on your thought here. What you people? Certainly, no one here has a clear understanding. Since it's reasonably clear, you do so here, can you explain your attitude? You can speak for yourself. I don't believe including others in your doomsday outcome is legitimate for anyone else. However, I will agree, no one here is certainly not better than your kind of fellow man. Your kind is intuitive as quarrelsome, rude and obnoxious, unless you can quote that behavior through scripture, as to why one should as a Christian. The other would be, your view of spiritual leaders. Why would anyone follow a person's, personal assumption, that would lead the aggressor into more darkness?

Like the Beatles song, All you need is love. Unfortunately, that rabid dog received the wrong kind. https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=beatles+all+i+need+is+love&fr=yhs-hidden-epic&fr2=p%3As%2Cv%3Av%2Cm%3Asb%2Crgn%3Atop&ei=UTF-8#id=1&vid=b98e16614c3ab33bfdd2b85a6f67f101&action=view

Can you explain how that can be, since that individual just stated I don't get along with anyone here? What part of that comment sways your argument.

When you accuse an organization about being one without proof; other than individuals acting on their own corrupt lust, is no proof that organization is consumed by that fault. Yet, you want proof of a person that is on probation for that same corrupt lust. Your demeanor is inconsistent with your personal lust for vengeance. You stated, you have officially denounced your association with that organization. Move on to a better pastor. You contradict yourself too much here be arguing with the same people, and then you agree with the same people. What does that say by defending the same people? The presumption comes from you. That seems to bother you. Yet, you have no clear understanding in the interpretation or linguistics of it, worth making a distinctive argument about it. As do you by your support of an individual here. Your argument has lost its value. That's means you are no better than the GB and that organization you disparage. Look first in the mirror before you attempt to cast out the demons of others.

Can you explain with rational why should I, here? What benefit would I receive to have an association here? I don't find being corrupted by individuals here a plus, do you?

Can you explain how, when it's clear, you show yours at every turn of your uneducated mission? You think your mission has value when you yourself have condemned yourself before God, and you proudly wrote about it. Have you stopped to think, your actions are an affront to God? You speak of Greek language when you don't have the knowledge of it. This is another indicator of what you show. It seems you're more comfortable being rude and obnoxious and yet you identify yourself as a Christian like these poor souls here. The other thing that lingers is what you commented on with @TrueTomHarley post about he and James, like each other. Then you comment you have not heard about the evidence. More conjecture and it's clear of what more it shows; what you are willing to accept, and what your foolish thoughts are about. Now, that's your choice, don't make it someone else's.

Since this applies to you, you should heed your own advice. I know I will. What was your suggestion of Ecclesiastes?

@PudgyMuch of what you post is irrelevant, with a false premise, and is driven by a clueless agenda that comes from a meaningless individual. People think too much of themselves here. This is why God made man, to tame animals. However, just like @Patiently waiting for Truth, @Srecko Sostar, @xero, being a rabid dog should be a concern for individuals that think rabies is just a joke.

When you make an assumption without thought, then your word should follow with the word "possibility" in front of other people as though the evening meal was something more than a "presentation" that should be observed until Christ return in his memory and God's promise. Why would it matter if the apostles continued that presentation? Why would it matter, if Christ followers continue that now? The word "rigid" should be used with your idea of that religious teaching and presentation. That makes your commentary, as your own word under quotation marks, indicates. That makes your response rude and obnoxious as anyone else with poor manners here. Therefore, your ideology and remarks are presented under a false tongue, since you are saying it. How does that argument go against your perceived bible interpretation?

Isn't that what you did? You seem convinced, your input is the only one that should matter here. Why not stick to scripture or none at all. Don't use scripture to convince yourself you're in a mission, when its clear, vengeance is the only thing you seek.

How can you. Do you need to be rude an obnoxious that you can't control your false tongue?

Can you explain if the Jews and Gentiles thought, it was a literal process? Can you give me a biblical text where the apostles turned into cannibals, for the sake of Jesus?

Can you explain your position here? How can he not? If you're so concerned about pedophilia, why would you associate yourself with a known one. This would certainly make no sense with any pedophilia argument coming from you.

Then why do you criticize others when they do it? I don't see the benefit on being contradictory with certain positions.

@Pudgy It appears intelligence is not high on the agenda here; I can answer your comment this way. When God created man, he gave man the ability to think, an ability the animal Kingdom did not possess. 7 All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles, and creatures of the sea are being tamed and have been tamed by man, 8 but no man can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. Here, I can repost @xero previous thought Ecc. 7:9 9 Do not be quickly provoked in your spirit, for anger settles in the lap of a fool. So, can you explain how a vicious animal trained to be rude and obnoxious know when a human is wrong? Can it be this animal was neutered, and doesn’t possess the ability to chase after puppy tail anymore?

Doesn't any (Church) do the same thing? Isn't that something you are doing by judging their interpretation? How does your interpretation of scripture fair against others, that it becomes greater? Isn't following in Jesus footsteps the blueprint to excellence?

Isn't Russia doing that to many organizations that are not affiliated to their communist ideology and Orthodox Church? Why would it matter to a Christian that follows Christ? I say that since you continue to post in a religious forum. What benefit would a Christian have?

Can you explain why you believe and organization that follows scripture, can be seen as though that organization wrote the Bible, under your personal observation?

You seem to be at odds with yourself as a nonintellectual animal. Perhaps learning from a real dog, you can get a straight forward question. Real dogs just obey without thought of mind of what the owner really needs, just wants. However, you seem to be an extremely rude and obnoxious person pretending to be an animal.

What makes you think, the death of Abel was acceptable to God? Is that what you understand from @Srecko Sostar, If yes, I would ask this person the same question. That cause was made from man's imperfection. When did God create imperfect beings? Why would anyone blame God for man's imperfection?

Thank you for making that specific distinction. My mistake. Yes, Apostle Paul in Hebrews 10:19-20 is talking about “the call to perseverance”; this message was meant for all, not just the anointed as indicated in Romans. NIV Romans 5:1-5 5 Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God. 3 Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; 4 perseverance, character; and character, hope. 5 And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us. However, I was referring and relating about being blessed after baptism that we should treat our own bodies as temples, indicted by that specific message in Hebrews chapters 3 and 10. We can also use chapter 3 with the word “house” as his congregation or church. NIV Hebrews 3:1-6 3 Therefore, holy brothers, who share in the heavenly calling, fix your thoughts on Jesus, the apostle and high priest whom we confess. 2 He was faithful to the one who appointed him, just as Moses was faithful in all God's house. 3 Jesus has been found worthy of greater honor than Moses, just as the builder of a house has greater honor than the house itself. 4 For every house is built by someone, but God is the builder of everything. 5 Moses was faithful as a servant in all God's house, testifying to what would be said in the future. 6 But Christ is faithful as a son over God's house. And we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast. NIV Hebrews 10:26-31 26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. 28 Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," and again, "The Lord will judge his people." 31 It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Thank you for your consideration. However, I will respectfully pass your understanding here since it changes the gospel. Is that something that is being mentioned here? There are poor examples of Jehovah Witnesses here that contradict scripture as they apply it in their daily lives. It appears loyalty to God is not high on them. I base my understanding of scripture on what is written in it. Therefore, can you explain how the call to perseverance and confidence in Christ amounts to the Faithful and Wise servant having false teachings when it appears there is a lack of will to understand scripture by the reader, and who is applying it? I see, thank you for clarifying that for me. It’s greatly appreciated when someone spends their time to clarify something without being rude and obnoxious, as it’s done regularly here by many Jehovah Witnesses. I guess those servants would be something to consider when stipulating about false teachings. If you wish, we can continue using the phrase Greek Scripture if you prefer. I have no problem with the Berean Society, since it appears to be an offshoot of the original Berean Bible Institute (BBI) from Australia. They were part of the Bible Student Association. This is true. No one should be offended. However, there are many that use different translations to have a specific approach to scripture. Those that believe they understand fluent Greek for example argue on a specific word and their understanding of that word. Perhaps these translations will become more consistent with what the message is. KJV 1 Corinthians 6:19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? (1 Cor. 6:19 KJV) CSB 1 Corinthians 6:19 Don't you know that your body is a sanctuary of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, (1 Cor. 6:19 CSB) The Holy Ghost (Spirit) is the Grace of God. I don’t see where that would be a person unless you believe in the Trinity. NAS 1 Corinthians 6:20 For you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body. (1 Cor. 6:20 NAS) 8.1 σῶμα, τος n: the physical body of persons, animals, or plants, either dead or alive - 'body.' πάντα δὲ τὰ μέλη τοῦ σώματος πολλὰ ὄντα ἕν ἐστιν σῶμα 'though all the parts of the body are many, it is still one body' 1 Cor 12.12; ὅπου τὸ σῶμα, ἐκεῖ καὶ οἱ ἀετοὶ Therefore, the body is the temple which is a physical thing, and we should treat it as a Holy Temple (The Holy Spirit duels in it) after Baptism, and we shouldn’t revert to our old ways as that would defile that physical temple. We can see that in some points we have come to an agreement. However, scripture speaks of not just the anointed as being part of the congregation (Christ Body) but others that will benefit from Christ sacrifice on earth which are also part of the church (Congregation-Christ Body). The Greek translation makes such distinction. 1920 ἐκκλησία , ας f church, congregation; assembly, gathering (of religious, political, or unofficial groups) 531 ἐκκλησία, ας, ἡ (1) in a general sense, as a gathering of citizens assembly, meeting (AC 19.32); (2) as the assembled people of Israel congregation (HE 2.12); (3) as the assembled Christian community church, congregation, meeting (RO 16.5); (4) as the totality of Christians living in one place church (AC 8.1); (5) as the universal body of believers church (EP 1.22) Great Conversation. Hope to have many civil discussions with you.

This is interesting. First you stated that asking someone if they are a Jehovah's Witness is insulting, and now you make an assumption of whom a poster is. The same sarcastic comment @TrueTomHarley made about not knowing who people are here, and they are liars, while another person @Arauna suggests letting it go. I guess, I should be insulted that you Jehovah Witnesses here are rude and obnoxious by trait, and want to be quarrelsome all the time.