Dmitar

Friend, can you clarify if this is your virtue, the way you express yourself toward others conflicts with not only the golden rule, but your application of that rule. I believe, as God's thinking creation, we can be civil to one another. We can also be gracious and accept our mistakes without having such a profound impact. Jehovah did not create a division between color. That impact is man-made and is governed as such.

I will agree, friend, such discussions should not sit with the righteous. Thank you for pointing out my fallacy. I again see where individuals here prefer to argue rather than accept facts. It has become common place with many subjects that shouldn't be relevant to a follower of Christ. My only objective here was to demonstrate a different perspective than those entered through personal life experience of having a cousin who lives in Chicago and is a lieutenant in a police department, among other relatives that are judges, among other things. "No one should live in fear of being stopped whenever he leaves his home to go about the activities of daily life. —U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin" BLACK RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND HUMAN RIGHTS What are black rights? There are no distinctive rights that people have based on race, and to combine a racial adjective with the word “rights” is a rhetorical device. Still, with true premises, a persuasive argument about black rights can be framed: 1. As human beings or American citizens, blacks and whites have the same rights. 2. Blacks have been deprived of rights compared to whites who are not so deprived. 3. It is unjust that blacks are deprived of rights whites have. 4. To bring attention to this injustice and encourage respect and protection of the rights of blacks, so that blacks are not disproportionately deprived of rights, it is useful to talk about “black rights.” p31 Once again, my apologizes for making this quarrelsome. That was not my intent.

The manner of your personal interpretation is false. Life experience can give a better account than statistics friend. Don't be rude.

It would seem, it also happens here with statistics. The way a question is framed, and answer might not give it justice. The perception of some reporters can differ with an indirect inference. The cops in an upper class neighborhood might spend time defusing a white counterpart to give up and not resist. The same scenario with a black person might not get the same consideration and that cop will be more motivated to shot first and ask questions later, than with a white person. Case in point. A black man wielding a knife is more likely to get shot than a white person wielding a knife. This scenario happened recently in two cases. The black person was killed, and the white person, even though he stabbed the cop in the neck, didn’t get fired upon. Then it becomes optics rather than facts or statistics.

Can you clarify this position, since it appears, you are engaging with an unrepentant person?

I would suspect an academic view can supersede a private opinion. But thanks for having one.

Thank you, friend. I consider only academic sources for my review in biological data. The concern lies with the apparent review in the S-protein, when there are 4 structured proteins in the Covid-19 variant. The coronavirus has been around since it was detected in the 20s from an animal host. Other viable vaccines that are not mRNA synthesis harmful virus by removing the most harmful markers in order to become none harmful. A human system will still detect it as a foreign body in order to develop antibodies. The mRNA is not that standard. Therefore, the synthetic genome and pathogenesis mimic what the other 3 proteins do once the S-Protein attach to the host cell. The spike protein value is only to attach. The earlier understanding of the Covid-19 virus is being referenced here. However, apologies for having to have made it quarrelsome, which wasn’t my intent.

Hello. The sequencing is in the vDNA. The spikiness in Covid-19 or crown is the formation which the mRNA does not replicate. In non-dividing cells, viruses can only access the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). Therefore, viruses have developed strategies to usurp the nuclear transport machinery and gain access to the nucleus. The majority of these viruses use the capsid to manipulate the nuclear import machinery. Therefore, the mRNA synthetically mimics that blueprint from a cell's DNA, as you adequately imply. Thank you friends for clarifying any misconceptions by giving a profound presentation.

Thank you friend. However, an antigen would not simulate a virus spikiness as indicated. It mimics the mitochondrial in order to achieve its goal. How would an mRNA vaccine be harmful? Can you expand on your thought? I understand you claim not to be an expert, and you consider your sources to be trustworthy. The majority of the scientific community agrees mRNA to be safe. Are these sources you consider trustworthy, academic in nature? Have they acquired a per-review?

Hello kind sir, Can you clarify for me what you mean by "shot inflicts damage, of its own" if a synthetic protein has no dangerous antigen? It is there, merely to "mimic" a viable, dangerous product. Neuroviral infections _ RNA viruses and retroviruses-CRC Press (2013) "Once RNP is released into the cytoplasm, the panhandle structure of the RNA is relaxed and the N proteins dissociate from the 3′ terminus of the RNA. Primary transcription of the vRNA to mRNA occurs in the cytoplasm through the cap-snatch mechanism. The endonuclease activity of the L protein is responsible for cleavage of the 5′ cap together with several nucleotides from selected host mRNAs (Figure 4.2b). The cleaved cap subsequently associates with the vRNA, and this initiates synthesis of the complementary strand. The viral protein N plays an important role in this process as it serves as a cap binding protein (similar to the eukaryotic eIF4E), and helps the L protein to cleave host mRNA (Panganiban and Mir 2009). Some specific host mRNAs are cleaved preferentially; for instance, LACV in mosquito cells utilizes preferable mRNA coding for proteins that are similar to apoptosis inhibitors from Drosophila (Borucki et al. 2002). To provide sufficient mRNAs for cleavage, hantaviruses have developed effective strategies for their storage in the cell. After the binding of N protein to the 5′ cap, the mRNAs are translocated to the so-called P-bodies where the mRNA is protected from degradation by binding to a viral nucleocapsid protein (Mir et al. 2008). At the 3′ end of the synthesized RNA, a couple of nucleotides are missed. These missed nucleotides are added by a mechanism called realign, when the L protein slides back to the start of the template vRNA after transcribing several nucleotides (Figure 4.2b) (Jin and Elliott 1993; Garcin et al. 1995). Only vRNA that is associated with an N protein can serve as a template for mRNA transcription (Dunn et al. 1995). Transcription of the S and L genomic segments is terminated by at least two terminating sequences, which are localized in the 5′ NCR. However, no analogous sequences were found in the M segment (Barr et al. 2006). Immediately after transcription, the translation of viral proteins begins. The translation starts when the N protein associates with the 5′ cap of the mRNA. The N protein mimics the activity of eIF4G (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma), which activates the host cell’s 43S preinitiation complex and thus facilitates translation (Panganiban and Mir 2009). p.73 Molecular Biology of the SARS-Coronavirus by Ilona Glowacka "The role of antibodies in antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in SARS vaccine has been controversial and extensively debated (Perlman and Dandekar 2005; Chen and Subbarao 2007). However, most of the evidence is taken from limited data from in vitro and animal experiments. The interpretation of these findings with regard to implications for human disease is not clear. Concerns over the safety of SARS vaccines came from a previous animal study in which ADE was observed in domestic cats after vaccination against feline infectious peritonitis coronavirus (FIPV) (Vennema et al. 1990). Moreover, ferrets that are immunized with MVA vaccine expressing S protein suffer hepatitis whilst failing to develop protection (Weingartl et al. 2004). In addition, some variants of SARS-CoV are resistant to antibody neutralization, but the infection is enhanced by antibodies against a different variant (Yang et al. 2005b). Under in vitro conditions, entry into human B-cell lines by SARS-CoV virus could be carried out in an FcgRII-dependent and ACE2-independent fashion, indicating that ADE of virus entry is an alternative cell entry mechanism of SARS-CoV (Kam et al. 2007). However, there is no direct evidence that patients with SARS have had previous exposure to a related virus. Likewise, there is no evidence of enhanced disease in the lungs of animals that are infected with SARS-CoV following passive transfer of antibodies against SARS-CoV induced by infection or immunization. Also, macrophages are not productively infected by SARS-CoV (Subbarao et al. 2004; Bisht et al. 2004; Stadler et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2004b; Greenough et al. 2005; Kam et al. 2007). Hence, the potential for ADE following SARS vaccination is low. However, due to the lack of animal models that mimic the clinical disease in humans, care must be taken in the interpretation of the safety data of SARS vaccines." pp. 269-270 Are you referring to another viral infection other than COVID-19? Or are you referring to an antiviral vaccine that doesn't have the mRNA synthetic component, such as the J&J vaccine. Thank you in advance.

29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.

Thank you friend for making that distinction. Human creation alongside the animal kingdom had canine teeth to consume certain types of vegetation. Those sharpen teeth regardless of the amount of canine teeth aided in the consumption of certain material. It would be unwise to suggest, canine teeth grew after the expulsion. One can understand, such as the black bear that strips the bark of a tree to consume the soft layer between the tree and bark.

Can you clarify friend what time structure you are referring to? If it was within the garden of Eden, animal teeth and claws can be explained by what kind of vegetation those animals were consuming. This is why humans are born with canine teeth. Did Adam and Eve have canine teeth? Perhaps not in the Garden, but definitely after they were expelled from the garden. Since Adam was supposed to tame all the animal kingdom within the Garden, he lost that ability after the garden. Before God created man, the animal kingdom while created not to sustain themselves by carnage, they were a none thinking creation. This is the reason why God started bringing the wild animals to Adam. Genesis 2:18-20. Now, the time difference within creation is considerable.

The same can be said about interpretation, friend. Let's see this example. Numbers 25:3-5 So Israel joined themselves to Baal of Peor, and the Lord was angry against Israel. The Lord said to Moses, “Take all the leaders of the people and execute them in broad daylight before the Lord, so that the fierce anger of the Lord may turn away from Israel.” So Moses said to the judges of Israel, “Each of you slay his men who have joined themselves to Baal of Peor. Christians cannot claim on trinity by ancient Israel, since they believed and worshiped other gods. The purpose of unity by the nation was oneness. The "oneness" referenced in scripture is for only one God. Deuteronomy 6:4. Ancient Israel was supposed to become one with Jehovah as his chosen people. Genesis 32:28, Exodus 19:5-6 That oneness carried over to Jesus time. There is only one Jesus. Separate entities respected in their own right. It would not be proper to join these two spiritual leaders as creator and ambassador to creation. Mark 12:29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: A fine distinction by son to father. The term "trinity" came much later by certain forefathers of the church, when they attempted to unite the Holy Ghost.

Dark Times: A Lockdown and a Call to Arms, 2021 A central tenet of Marxism and socialism is the repression of all religions other than the religion of the state. China represses Christians, Wegers (Uyghurs), and other groups are suppressed in that Communist country. More than a million Wegers are locked up in reeducation camps to rid them of their Muslim practices. Communist countries recognize religious groups which they control until they can completely eradicate them. Chinese Christians, for example, have an officially recognized church. Most Christians belong to the underground. The official Chinese Christian church does not allow the displaying of the cross. Regular Bibles are banned in China. Pictures of Jesus Christ were taken down and replaced with pictures of Xi Jinping. With the anti-Christian, anti-religion atmosphere loose in America at this time, do you not think these kinds of things would be happening in America if Progressives were in charge? A Socialist/Communist is a Socialist/Communist, and they have no use for religion whatsoever. Hidden Hand– Exposing how the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World 2020 Many Westerners are by now familiar with the CCP’s crackdown on religious worship in China, which includes the use of CCTV cameras in churches and mosques and forcing believers to practise in approved ways. The 11th and 12th Bureaus of the United Front Work Department devote extensive efforts to this repression, setting up ‘representative organisations’ for each religion.129 It was reported in 2019 that Tibetan nomads had been told they would continue to receive state subsidies only if they ‘replaced their altars devoted to Buddhist deities with images of Chinese political leaders’.130 Christians have been pressured to replace images of Jesus with photos of Xi Jinping. In a move that resonated with its position in the 1930s, the Vatican reached an agreement with Beijing to allow the Party to choose Catholic bishops. In Henan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Liaoning, and Hebei, churches have been ordered to fly the Chinese flag, destroy banners and images with religious messages, and sing the national anthem and Communist Party songs at their services. Government-installed television cameras with facial-recognition technology monitor congregations. Children under eighteen have been forbidden to attend churches, and local people have been threatened with expulsion from education and employment if they "believe in religions." In some parts of the country the faithful have been asked to replace paintings of Jesus with portraits of President Xi Jinping. Thus, Xi's New Regulations on Religious Affairs, described by Amnesty International as "draconian," are causing considerable concern.' Catholics in Hong Kong are particularly worried.

Friend, can you clarify the difference between a seminary scholar and an accredited secular scholar? Dr. Julius R. Mantey A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament has been quoted in the past by the Watchtower. However, when he has been asked leading questions such as the difference between Jehovah and Christ? He believes them to be different. No trinity, as indicated by his own seminary.

Thank you friend. This shows people the many interpretations that come from the same substance, while invoking the same text.

The way I see “one judgment” is through the effect of condemnation. I read text such as 1 Corinthians 15:22, Romans 5:8, John 3:16, and I see humanity being condemned by Adam's sin. Therefore, that one judgment would apply to us all. After all, that is why Jesus gave his life for. Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. Leviticus 24:22 There shall be one judgment for the stranger and the native, for I am the Lord your God. Thank you friends for clarifying the judgment upon man that relates to us all. The only difference between the saints and the rest is how we receive the gift of perfection. 1 John 2:2

Thank you friend for your reply. Can you clarify what you mean by "one judgment" since Christ gave his life for all of us due to the original sin? The heavenly hope and the earthly hope have the same amount of sin value. The 144,000 thousand will be cleansed immediately and set to perfection, while the ones with and earthly hope will gradually receive that perfection. The difference I see is with the unrighteous along with the righteous that will form a union on earth. After the 1000,-year reign into perfection, then all of God's creation will form one perfect union in paradise along with heaven. When Satan gets released again, he will undoubtedly temp humanity and the angels. That much is foretold. However, my interest friend is on your thought about one judgment. Can you explain this further?

Thank you friend for making such an important clarification, since only the ones deemed righteous will have the honor to serve in heaven. This would mean the 144,000 saints would be received as "perfect beings" in heaven as a reward for their faithful serve and loyalty. However, the point of the text you mention also go in favor of the righteous ones that will be spared at the end of Judgement day while the unrighteous will also be raised from the dead, on earth. This is a critical distinction that should always be made as evangelizers.

Perhaps friend, you can clarify this portion of your understanding, since the 1440,000 thousand saints are unrighteous just like the apostles were by their imperfection. What gives the saints the ability to wash their sins away in order to be received in heaven as helpers?

What would be so astonishing about Brother Rutherford’s book? It cannot be because of the title. The only difference with the title is that brother Rutherford added a term already in use with “will never die”. What was the meaning behind “millions now living” that was obtained before brother Rutherford added a thought that emphasized what earlier preachers were already speaking about. He maintained, scriptural integrity. Brother Rutherford used the term “end of the world” in his book as a scriptural lesson to confirm the words of Christ, 17 times. Yet, in those, he does not imply the end of the world would have been in 1914 or 1925. He refers to the second coming of Christ, just like any other Christian Religion was speaking of at that time. His words for 1914 were, 1920-Millions now living will never die! This is not due to the fact that the earth is less productive, nor is it due to the fact of man's inability to plant and produce more; hut it is due to the unsettled condition’s resulting from the world war, which conditions Jesus clearly foretold would accompany the war; and it is another evidence that 1914 marked the beginning of the end of the world; for Jesus plainly said, "These are the beginning of sorrows". 1855-Bibliotheca_Sacra_and_Theological_Review page 496 Millenarianism. They have taken their position, and they must maintain it. They have predicted that" the end of the world is at hand,” and they must prove it. Where the signs of the times cannot be enlisted, as witnesses, they have recourse to exaggeration and bold and startling assertions. In this new Pandora's box which they have opened, no hope for the doomed millions now living lingers at the bottom. The elect are already gathered in; the last seal has been broken ; the last trumpet has sounded , and the last vial has been poured out, and the accumulated woes portended by these symbols are now rolling, like billows , over the earth. The end must come, do what we may ; it cannot be delayed . The chariot wheels of the " King of kings " are now moving on the highway to fearful judgments. The wrath of God will burn to the lowest hell. The Gospel has been preached “ as a witness ” and failed to convince the world of sin ; now, it must prove a savor of death unto death to all that live ; still , the ministers of Christ must preach though they know that their labor in the Lord will be in vain , and that their efforts to enlighten their flocks will only enhance their condemnation and misery throughout eternity. 1864-The Universalist Quarterly and General Review, page 53 What becomes of the hundreds of millions who lived before the advent of the Redeemer; of the hundreds of millions now living who devoutly worship false Gods There is but one answer. They must enter the garden of the Lord's house after the death of the body, or they can never enter at all . But are these multitudes responsible for the circumstance that their birth dates anterior to that period when it pleased God to send mankind a Redeemer? are they to be condemned to endless death on the ground that they never knew that Jesus was indeed the Christ, the Son of the living God ? ” 1873-The Old Book tested popular queries about the Bible page 160 have we evidence in the experience and in the lives of men, that the work which Christ said he would accomplish has been effected? As to the experience of salvation from the condemnation and guilt of sin, we have the testimony of millions in the past, and of millions now living, that, believing in Jesus, they have been freely and fully for given . Down through all the ages their testimony has been clear and uniform. Men living in different countries, and in different circumstances, have, as with one voice, declared that we have redemption in the blood of Christ, the forgiveness of sins. 1889-Social Christianity page 112 Those four epistles contain indisputable proof that St. Paul and the early Christians believed that Jesus had risen from the dead . That is all we want the New Testament to prove on this subject. We have then to choose between the universal belief of men who risked and forfeited their lives for their belief, and the à priori assumptions of modern scepticism . And that is not all. The historical evidence for the Resurrection includes the personal testimony of millions of Christians in every century of the Christian era, and of millions now living.

Indeed, friend. There are many examples where we can draw an encouraging parallel. We can see, when Noah was commissioned to build the ark, it was well over 37 years before judgment came to humanity. When Jehovah was angered by Israel in Numbers 32:13 of which I commented on, it took 40 years for a generation to undo what their fathers had done. When we see an overlapping generation, it is meant to be seen as instructional for the next generation to follow. All generations are linked by that inspirational claim to faith, just as it was with the prophets. 2 Peter 3:11-13 Are we a superior race, where we can claim to be better than Christ? If the son wasn't given that foresight, then we cannot force Jehovah as ancient Israel did, by their demands. We would not have learned anything as a race. Galatians 6:7 My intention was not to quarrel about faith. Nothing good ever comes out of it. I will continue with the intentions brothers Russell and Rutherford had as students of the bible.

Friend, I think you can see the parallel in Jesus words he personally spoke of that is recorded in the bible. Perhaps you are thinking of 1914. A specific date not entered in scripture, like 70 CE. Yet through history, we know of an event that happened in 70 CE that is in direct correlation and in harmony with scripture. Those who did accept certain warnings in 33 CE were caught off from the Roman destruction. The same can be said in the impending last days Jesus spoke of for a future and last prophecy of the ages. If we look at Jesus words, and if you wish to subject them as overlapping, then you will find many examples of overlapping generation in scripture. A simple one would be, The generation that had to wait until all that generation that sinned against Jehovah had died out. Which bible base conclusion is that from? The bible gives us, by faith, there will be a last judgment of humanity. We just need to see the evidence scripture provides us. 1 Corinthians 4:5, Jude 1:7, Luke 18:8, Hebrews 1:1-2, 2 Peter 3:3-4, 1 Timothy 4:1-3, 2 Timothy 3:1-5, Revelation 1:1-7, etc. This is referred to as "collective actions" by humanity. Before, we could hear of some deliverance, but not all at once as it is being witnessed and collected after 1914. Once that can be embedded in our hearts and minds, then the words in Matthew 24:36-44 become a comfort. The collective actions of humanity right now gives us that sequence of events that we are now witnessing. Can the faithful turn their backs on that? Definitely not dear friend. While no Christian should force their faith on others, they should be doers, as Jesus once was and is our greatest example of that faith. Brother Russell, welcomed everyone to participate in the study of the bible. If you wish to use the term overlapping, then consider how many generations, has been hearing the gospel of Christ since his death, and now many generations after Jesus death has heard the right gospel of Christ. 1 John 2:18 You will get different answers from the same term. However, we can see through scripture, there are many examples of overlapping generations recorded, by the fate of many in the past that is recorded in scripture for our benefit.