Jump to content
The World News Media

School District Ignites Controversy With Proposed Restrictions on ‘Leggings,’ ‘Skinny Jeans’ and ‘Other Excessively Tight-Fitting Pants’


TheWorldNewsOrg

Recommended Posts

  • Member

A public school district in Wilmington, North Carolina, has drawn the ire of some local parents and students, alike, with a proposal to ban skinny jeans and other tight-fitting pants that aren’t worn with a shirt or dress that covers the “posterior area.”

The New Hanover County School System reportedly drafted the proposed ban after some “bigger” girls were targeted and bullied over wearing tight jeans, school board vice-chairwoman Jeanette Nichols explained.

As a result, officials are reportedly seeking to possibly restrict leggings, skinny jeans and “any other excessively tight fitting pants” that are not accompanied by a dress or shirt that would “cover the posterior in its entirety, according to the Associated Press.

The change, if adopted, would amend the current dress code, which already restricts dresses and other articles such as skirts or shorts that might also be too short. See the amended changes below, which were preliminarily accepted by the school board last month:

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 5.37.08 AM

New Hanover County School System

It didn’t take long for some students and parents to protest the move. And, on Tuesday, school board member Lisa Estep also joined the chorus of dissenters, publishing a long Facebook post about her concerns over the policy changes.

“According to the news, the reason given by one of my fellow School Board members for this proposed change was that a ‘bigger girl’ was being bullied, presumably for wearing the aforementioned attire,” she wrote. “As a 6’1″ ‘bigger girl,’ I grew up being teased, bullied, and ostracized at different times in my life. And I know, to my shame, that sometimes I wasn’t so nice myself.”

Estep continued, “Guess what? You can’t legislate kindness. But you can teach it. You can’t legislate compassion. But you can live it.”

In the end, she said that she simply doesn’t believe that the policy will work.

Others have also pushed back, with one individual tweeting a series of images featuring women wearing big dresses. She wrote, “Finally, I’ll get a chance to wear my civil war dresses.”

A person identifying him or herself as a parent in the district added, “If bullying is the impetus, do a better job of teaching the kids to be nice. Don’t tell them how to dress.”

The response has been so sweeping that Nichols said that it is likely that the policy will be reviewed and further discussed by district officials.

Follow the author of this story on Twitter and Facebook and check out his new book “The Armageddon Code: One Journalist’s Quest for End-Times Answers”:

Read more stories from TheBlaze

High School Graduates’ Defiant Response to Atheists’ Demand That the Lord’s Prayer Be Stripped From Commencement — and the Rousing Applause That Followed

Glenn Beck Predicts Pedophilia is the ‘Next Stop on This Train’

Trump: I Don’t Know Enough to Discuss, but Suicide of Former Clinton White House Aide ‘Very Fishy’

‘Way to Show Discipline at West Point’: Cadet Blasted After Video Shows Her Marching to Graduation — but Focused on Something Else Entirely

Atheists Threaten to Sue Over Giant Cross in Texas Park — and Here’s the Bold Move Officials Just Took to Try and Preserve It

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 304
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm having trouble locating the other post regarding discrepancies. I'm going to share this discrepancy here. Perhaps I didn't search thoroughly enough. Did you mean to say that there is no clear indication of how a celestial observer or scribe could be defined according to Francesca Rochberg as an astrologer? I'm curious if they did require assistance from mathematicians then. What would happen if a scribe was illiterate and not an astrologer, but a record needed to be made because no astrologer was available to record an urgent event? "The title “t.upˇsar En¯uma Anu Enlil,” although easily yet only literally translated as “scribe of En¯uma Anu Enlil,” is difficult to define. The common translation, “astrologer,” by focusing on only one aspect of the En¯uma Anu Enlil scribe’s activities, conveys an inadequate and one-sided picture. No one-word English translation of t.upˇsar En¯uma Anu Enlil adequately defines the field of expertise of the En¯uma Anu Enlil scribe without implying an anachronistically sharp distinction between astrologer and astronomer, and an implied distinction between pseudoscientist and scientist." This observation was not limited to Mesopotamian scribal scholarship in general, but also extended to a similar concern for Babylonian culture. "Textual sources from which one can piece together the range of responsibilities and expertise of a scribe of En¯uma Anu Enlil are fortunately not limited to those on which the title appears, as these are surprisingly rare. In the Neo-Assyrian period, the available texts include one letter mentioning the “reports of the t.upˇsar En¯uma Anu Enlils,”37 one Babylonian report in which the writer ˇSum¯aia is the “scribe of En¯uma Anu Enlil from the new team,”38 and one administrative document listing the employees of the court in which seven t.upˇsar En¯uma Anu Enlils head the list, two of whom are well known from the court correspondence and the astrological reports, that is, Iˇstar-ˇsuma-¯ereˇs and Balasˆı." How do modern scholars make adjustments if they have no way of knowing the mental state of the ancient scribes? They must grapple with the uncertainty of the formulas used or not used. It seems that a great deal of interpretation is based on conjecture, leading to disagreements among scholars. This uncertainty certainly impacts certain areas of scholarly interpretation. It seems that they took their records seriously, but can we truly rely on them if we consider that the scribe may not have been a scholar?
    • I can't believe it! You actually sent me a staggering six reference books and an impressive dozen articles. I'm not a fast reader, haha!  
    • Have you examined the writings of Francesca Rochberg? This person adds a unique perspective to the works of Hunger, Sachs, and Steele. It is truly enlightening to observe Ptolemy's fascination with that particular era in Tetr. 2.3. It's fascinating how they still refer to Piches and Johannes' works, especially with additional information and further footnotes. 
    • I think we can take Geo Jackson’s words as a template. ‘You don’t want to take sides,’ he says, and to show the challenge of keeping neutral, he uses the example of contesting politicians in Australia, one of whom wanted to draft people of Jackson’s age into the military and one of whom did not. Now that would test your resolve to stay neutral, he said, nonetheless you must do it. If he was as ignorant of politics as some seem to think is the gold standard, he would not have even known which politician’s views would be to his benefit and which one would not. Of course, I leaned into him on this point, informing him that: I’m sure he gave my words all the consideration they deserved before instantly turning his attention to other matters.
    • Then stop using AI Tools, since it's clear you have none, at least not where it counts. Now to please your kind of friends, I can see it.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,678
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    James Hume
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.