Jump to content
The World News Media

How John McCain’s Senate Challenger Is Relying on Her Medical Background — and Trump — to Win


TheWorldNewsOrg

Recommended Posts

  • Member

Dr. Kelli Ward thinks Donald Trump could be an asset in 2016.

In fact, the former Arizona state senator believes that Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, could be valuable to her campaign as she seeks to take out Sen. John McCain (R) in the GOP Senate primary — especially when it comes to the issue of illegal immigration, an issue that Ward said cited as one of the most important plaguing Arizonans as well as the rest of the country.

“For me, having Trump at the top of the ticket is going to be advantageous,” Ward told TheBlaze in an interview Tuesday evening. “Now, for Sen. McCain, not so much.”

UNITED STATES - MARCH 3: Dr. Kelli Ward, candidate vying for Sen. John McCain's Senate seat, speaks with supporters at the American Conservative Union's CPAC conference at National Harbor in Oxon Hill, Md., on Thursday, March 3, 2016. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Dr. Kelli Ward, a candidate vying to unseat GOP Sen. John McCain, speaks with supporters. (Getty Images/Bill Clark)

Ward, who calls herself a “liberty-loving conservative Republican,” argued that illegal immigration and the country’s southernmost border would be the first and foremost issue she’d tackle as a U.S. senator, because “it’s effecting every single aspect of our society — from health care to education to public safety to the economy.”

“We here in Arizona are fed up with hearing John McCain saying ‘build the dang fence’ whenever he’s running for office, and then going straight to an amnesty bill whenever he gets to Washington, D.C.,” she said.

While Ward met with and attended a variety of rallies for GOP presidential contenders as they campaigned in Arizona, she does support Trump for president, Stephen Sebastian, a spokesman for her campaign, confirmed to TheBlaze. She also “hopes to sponsor his ‘Build the Wall’ legislation and looks forward to working alongside Sen. [Ted] Cruz to pass it,” Sebastian said.

Trump soundly won Arizona’s presidential primary in March, garnering more than 47 percent of the vote.

“I think that a lot of people are afraid of Donald Trump; I’m not one,” Ward told TheBlaze. “I think the things he is saying on the campaign trail are resonating with the people. They want secure borders. They want to stop illegal immigration. They want to prioritize America and American citizens. They want to have a strong economy. They want jobs to come back to this country so that they, their families and their friends can have access to employment and the freedom of employment rather than the shackles of welfare.”

Political insiders in the Beltway, Ward said, are concerned that McCain is “the most vulnerable down-ballot Republican from Donald Trump.”

“Here in Arizona, people are really considering which Republican they want to keep down ballot because we want to keep that seat,” she said. “We want to make it a conservative Republican seat. That’s been wonderful for me because they understand that I am that right Republican, so when Donald Trump is at the top of the ticket, they’re going to come out and vote for Kelli Ward as well.”

Multiple Republican politicos with knowledge of the campaign told TheBlaze Wednesday that Ward wasn’t wrong. GOP strategist Noel Fritsch told TheBlaze:

In March, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, two outsider presidential candidates, combined for an astonishing 72 percent of Arizona’s Republican primary vote, a clear indication that Copper State voters will undoubtedly look to replace grumpy John McCain — a politician who repeatedly votes to fund Planned Parenthood and Obamacare, saddles our kids with astronomical debt, supports amnesty and ships American jobs to China — with a proven conservative like Senator Kelli Ward.

Dr. David Woodard, Thurmond professor of political science at Clemons University, said that there is a feeling that the lawmakers have “overstayed their welcome.”

“That may not auger very well for running statewide in November,” Woodard told TheBlaze, adding that other candidates can “bring new, fresh and improved ideas to the race — that’s what most people will vote on.”

But the McCain campaign maintains confidence in the upcoming primary — as well as the general election.

“John McCain has built a strong campaign that is ready for any challenge,” Lorna Romero, McCain’s campaign spokeswoman, told TheBlaze Wednesday. “We are confident that voters will support John McCain, a great Arizona hero whose record of service and sacrifice is unmatched.”

Aside from immigration, Ward said that her background as a physician enables her to tackle the controversial Affordable Care Act — otherwise known as Obamacare.

“There are lots of problems with Obamacare, but one of the biggest is that they didn’t get people who actually take care of patients to weigh in on how we could better provide access to high-quality, cost-effective health care,” she said. “And they came up with a kind of unworkable utopia that will never be able to financially stand on it’s own; it will never provide care to all people.”

“Sen. McCain has said that Obamacare is the law of the land, we just need to accept it. Well, I’m not willing to accept it,” Ward continued, adding that her background in the emergency room, private practice and academia gives her a well-rounded view of the health care system.

Besides policy issues, Ward said there is another stark difference between her and McCain that brings a unique set of challenges on the campaign trail — gender.

“I think it is a little bit different as a female candidate, because people are very judgmental,” Ward said. “You think about Sen. McCain getting ready to go up on the stage. All he has to do is throw a blue blazer on and change his tie, and he’s ready to go. I have people who have no qualms about telling me that my hair is bad, or they don’t like my lipstick, or that I look frumpy. I don’t think a man who is in politics has ever been called ‘frumpy.’”

Ward recalled a time when she wore flats as she was on crutches — and people noticed.

“Those things are definitely a challenge — superficial kinds of things where people make comments and judgments based on what somebody looks like, and that’s harder for a woman,” Ward said. “Also, you have to think as a mom and a wife, it is a big challenge because you’re leaving your family. And men do too, but traditionally a mom is there.”

Thankfully, Ward said, her parents and in-laws are nearby and can help her husband and three children while she’s running for office, which eases her “mommy guilt” and “wife guilt.”

“I try to bring the whole package,” Ward said. “I try to look good, and I try to have great ideas and put sound policies forward because I will take the shallow votes from the people who say, ‘Oh, she looks nice.’ I’ll take those votes just as much as from the policy wonks.”

McCain remains in front of his challengers ahead of the Aug. 30 primary — but not by a landslide, according to a Public Policy Polling survey released last month. The survey found that McCain is polling at 39 percent followed by Ward at 26 percent. Three other challengers are polling at less than 5 percent.

About 27 percent of Arizona Republican primary voters were still undecided.

Follow Kaitlyn Schallhorn (@K_Schallhorn) on Twitter

 

Read more stories from TheBlaze

SiriusXM Temporarily Suspends Glenn Beck Over Brad Thor’s Comments About Trump: ‘This Is NOT What He Meant’

Never-Trumper Bill Kristol Is Eyeing This Conservative Lawyer For a Third-Party Run

Trump Goes After ABC Reporter in Middle of Press Conference on Veteran Donations: ‘You’re a Sleaze’

After N.J. Police Deny Him a Concealed Carry Permit, This Army Lt. Colonel Takes His Case to Court — Here’s How the Judge Ruled

12-Year-Old Science Whiz Gathers and Shares All the ‘Evidence That Vaccines Cause Autism’

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 209
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An interesting concept, bible discipline. I am struck by the prevalence of ignorance about spiritual discipline on "Reddit." While physical and mental disciplines receive attention, the profound impact of spiritual discipline on a person's physical and mental well-being is often overlooked. Is it possible to argue against the words of the Apostle Paul? When he penned those words in Hebrews 12, he was recognizing that there are moments when an individual must be "rebuked" in order to be corrected. Even Jesus himself established a precedent when he rebuked Peter and referred to him as Satan for failing to comprehend what Jesus had already revealed to the apostles. Did that imply that Jesus had an evil heart? Not at all, it was quite the opposite; Jesus had a loving heart. His need to correct Peter actually showcased his genuine love for him. If he hadn't cared, he would have let Peter persist in his mistaken ways, leading to a fate similar to Judas'. There is a clear emphasis on avoiding the apostate translation and its meaning, yet many seem to overlook the biblical foundation for the reasons NOT to follow the path of the fallen brethren or those with an apostate mentality. Those individuals have embraced the path of darkness, where the illuminating power of light cannot penetrate, to avoid receiving the righteous discipline based on God's Bible teachings. They are undoubtedly aware that this undeniable truth of life must be disregarded in order to uphold their baseless justifications for the unjust act of shunning. Can anyone truly "force" someone or stop them from rejecting a friend or family member? Such a notion would be absurd, considering the fact that we all have the power of free will. If a Witness decides to distance themselves from a family member or friend simply because they have come out as gay, who is anyone within the organization to question or challenge that personal sentiment? It is unfortunate that there are individuals, both within and outside the organization, who not only lack a proper understanding of the Bible but also dare to suggest that God's discipline is barbaric. We must remember that personal choices should be respected, and it is not for others to judge or condemn someone based on their sexual orientation but should be avoided under biblical grounds. No one should have the power to compel an individual to change their sexual orientation, nor should anyone be forced to accept someone for who they are. When it comes to a family's desire to shield their children from external influences, who has the right to challenge the parents' decision? And if a family's rejection of others is based on cultural factors rather than religious beliefs, who can impose religious judgment on them? Who should true followers of Christ follow? The words of God or those who believe they can change God's laws to fit their lives? How can we apply the inspired words of Paul from God to embrace the reality of God's discipline? On the contrary, how can nonconformists expect to persuade those with a "worldview" that their religious beliefs are unacceptable by ostracizing individuals, when God condemns homosexuality? This is precisely why the arguments put forth by ex-witnesses are lacking in their pursuit of justice. When they employ misguided tactics, justice remains elusive as their arguments are either weak or inconsistent with biblical standards. Therefore, it is crucial to also comprehend Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 9:27. The use of the word "shun" is being exaggerated and excessively condemned by those who reject biblical shunning as a form of punishment. Eph 5:3-14 NIV 3 But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people. 4 Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. 5 For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person — such a man is an idolater — has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.  6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God's wrath comes on those who are disobedient. 7 Therefore do not be partners with them.  8 For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) 10 and find out what pleases the Lord. 11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible. The impact of the message becomes significantly stronger when we emphasize the importance of avoiding any association with unrighteousness and those who remain unrepentant. In fact, it becomes even more compelling when we witness how some individuals, who dismiss biblical shunning as a method of discipline, excessively criticize and condemn the use of the word "shun". Therefore, Jehovah's Witnesses do not shun people; instead, they choose to focus on the negative actions being committed, which is in accordance with biblical teachings. This should be construed as ex-Witness rhetoric. Now, let's consider why ex-Witnesses specifically target one particular religion. What justifications do they provide when other Christian denominations also adhere to the same principle grounded in the Bible? Chapter 1 - Preface Both must therefore test themselves: the one, if he is qualified to speak and leave behind him written records; the other, if he is in a right state to hear and read: as also some in the dispensation of the Eucharist, according to  custom enjoin that each one of the people individually should take his part. One's own conscience is best for choosing accurately or shunning. And its firm foundation is a right life, with suitable instruction. But the imitation of those who have already been proved, and who have led correct lives, is most excellent for the understanding and practice of the commandments. "So that whosoever shall eat the bread and drink the cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  It therefore follows, that every one of those who undertake to promote the good of their neighbours, ought to consider whether he has betaken himself to teaching rashly and out of rivalry to any; if his communication of the word is out of vainglory; if the the only reward he reaps is the salvation of those who hear, and if he speaks not in order to win favour: if so, he who speaks by writings escapes the reproach of mercenary motives. "For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know," says the apostle, "nor a cloak of covetousness. God is witness. Nor of men sought we glory, neither of you, nor yet of others, when we might have been burdensome as the apostles of Christ. But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children."   (from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 2) Divine promises 2. The manner of shunning, in the word escaping. There is a flying away required, and that quickly, as in the plague, or from a fire which hath almost burned us, or a flood that breaketh in upon us. We cannot soon enough escape from sin (Matt 3:7; Heb 6:18). No motion but flight becomes us in this case. Doctrine: That the great end and effect of the promises of the gospel is to make us partakers of the Divine nature. (from The Biblical Illustrator)  
    • Clearly, they are already demanding your exile. Yes! It's unfortunate that Pudgy spoiled a great discussion about science. I hope the discussion can continue without any more nonsensical interruptions. Just a suggestion since they are on your heels. Wow! You speak! It seems you have a lot to say! Now they are going to treat like, who do you think you are, mister big stuff! Are those aliens now going to imply that anyone who speaks out against the five or six key contributors to this site will be treated as though it is George just because those in opposition speak the language they hate to hear, the TRUTH? They are seeking individuals who will embrace their nonconformist values and appreciate what they can offer in shaping public opinion contrary to the established agenda of God and Christ. Their goal is to enhance their writing abilities and avoid squandering time on frivolous pursuits, mainly arguing about the truth they don't care for. They see it all as a mere game, even when leading people astray. They believe they have every right to and will face no biblical repercussions, or so they believe. They just want to have fun just like that Cyndi Lauper song. Be prepared to be belittled and ridiculed, all the while they claim to be angels. Haha! By the way, please refrain from using the same language as George. They appear to believe that when others use the same words, it means they are the same person, and they emphasize this as if no one else is allowed to use similar grammar. It seems they think only they have the right to use the same or similar writing styles. Quite amusing, isn't it? See, what I just placed in bold, now I'm George, lol! Now, let's leave this nice science thread for people that want to know more about science. I believe George left it at "Zero Distance."  
    • Nice little thread you’ve got going here, SciTech. It would be a shame if something were to happen to it.
    • It's truly disheartening when someone who is supposed to be a friend of the exclusive group resorts to using profanity in their comments, just like other members claiming to be witnesses. It's quite a ludicrous situation for the public to witness.  Yet, the "defense" of such a person, continues. 
    • No. However, I would appreciate if you do not reveal to all and sundry the secret meeting place of the closed club. (I do feel someone bad stomping on Sci’s little thread. But I see that has already happened.)
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Pamela Dunston  »  T.B. (Twyla)

      Hi, TB
      I would like to get the weekly meeting and watchtower materials  and the 2024 convention 
      Attend the 2024 Convention—“Declare the Good News!”
      notebook, I just recently got a new computer, If don't mind my brother to add me on and allow me access to our study again.
       
      Thank you, so much
      Sister Dunston
      · 1 reply
    • SpiritualSister 24  »  DARLENE2022

      Hello, Darlene, I just love your name, I had a cousin named Darline, and had a classmate also named Darlene! It's a pleasure to know another Darlene! Especially a Spiritual Sister! There's some websites, Ministry Ideaz , JW Stuff.com, and Etsy that I use to order my yearly buttons for the Conventions! They always send me what I order, and their also Jehovah's Witnesses, that send us the merchandise we order!  You can check out these websites, and they might have what your looking for! I hope I have been helpful in assisting you, Darlene! Agape love, Shirley!😀
      · 1 reply
    • SpiritualSister 24

      2024"Enter Into God's Rest" Circuit Assembly! 
      · 0 replies
    • Janice Lewis  »  T.B. (Twyla)

      Hello Twyla, when will the weekly study material be available. I am a member.
      Janice Lewis     lewisjanice84@gmail.com
      Thank you
      · 1 reply
    • Chloe Newman  »  T.B. (Twyla)

      Hi Twyla,
       
      When will the meeting material for week com Monday 11th March 2024 be available?
       
      You normally post it the week before, normally on a Thursday.
       
      Please let me know if there is any problem.
       
      Best Regards
       
      Chloe
       
       
       
       
      · 0 replies
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.8k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,685
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    josteiki
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.