Jump to content
The World News Media

Testigo de Jehová abusó sexualmente de su sobrina y fue condenado a 10 años de prisión

Jack Ryan

Recommended Posts

  • Member

Screen Shot 2018-06-16 at 10.45.32 AM.png

En la jornada de este viernes, se realizó el juicio al testigo de Jehová, Eduardo Ismael Ávila, estaba imputado por haber abusado sexualmente de una de sus sobrinas.

Las defensoras oficiales Silvia Gerez y Lisa Vega, que asistieron al acusado, solicitaron la absolución de éste por el beneficio de la duda, y subsidiariamente una pena mínima por abuso sexual simple

Mientras que la fiscal Gabriela Gauna había requerido una condena de 13 años de prisión

Finalmente, fue condenado por 10 años de prisión.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 288
  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Diez años de cárcel a un Testigo de Jehová por violar su sobrina huérfana

El aberrante sujeto sometió a la niña entre los 10 y 12 años. Fue penado ayer por un tribunal, que por otro lado, lo absolvió de cargos en contra de una hermanita de la víctima.

Un miembro de los Testigos de Jehová fue condenado a diez años de cárcel al ser hallado responsable de ultrajar sexualmente a una de sus sobrinas huerfánas.

Así lo dispuso el tribunal, a cargo de los vocales Graciela Viaña de Avendaño, María Peralta de Aguirre y Juan Carlos Storniolo (presidente).

La sentencia recayó en contra de Eduardo Ismael Ávila, con residencia en Las Termas de Río Hondo.

De acuerdo con la síntesis de la fiscal Gabriela Gauna, la niña tiene seis hermanos más, quienes en el 2012 quedaron huérfanos, al morir primero su madre, víctima de una enfermedad y al poco tiempo, también el papá en un accidente de tránsito.

La familia resolvió separar a los hermanitos y tres fueron con el tío Eduardo, hermano del papá (muerto) de los chiquitos.

Al poco tiempo, el individuo empezó a irrumpir en la habitación de una nena de 10 años, se supo.

Apeló a manoseos y luego la sometió sexualmente.

Cansada de los frecuentes abusos, la nenita se lo confió a una hermana mayor, a quien también otra hermanita le había relatado manoseos nocturnos.


El sujeto llegó a juicio acusado de dos casos de abuso sexual, cargos sobre los cuales Gauna cimentó un reclamo de condena de 13 años.

Ayer, en los alegatos Gauna fue dura y requirió al tribunal no olvidar la soledad y la responsabilidad de "guardador" de Ávila.

En tanto, la defensa pidió la absolución y que los jueces le retiren el agravante de "guardador".

Cerca de las 13.30, los camaristas develaron la sentencia.

En ella, absolvieron a Ávila del caso de los manoseos a una sobrina.

Sin embargo, le fijaron diez años de cárcel por el "abuso uso sexual con acceso carnal agravado por su condición de guardador", en la otra niña.

El Testigo de Jehová se fue en silencio y ahora lo espera una celda en el Penal de Varones.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    • Jw.Org1976

      Jw.Org1976 0

      Last active:
    • Natacha Rice

      Natacha Rice 1

      Last active:
    • misette

      misette 213

      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.