Space Merchant

@TheWorldNewsOrg There was an update, I believe 20 dead now and 26+ injured. Evidently the death toll may rise. A second shooting recently happen, this time in Ohio.

@TrueTomHarley Or that. Pretty much anyone is does not like what Apostle Paul had to say. Believe it or not, those that do are often the ones to either ignore Paul's written, or tear it out from their Bible - ALL OF IT. I remember one of my debates a group one, a long time ago, the other group had one of their speakers, a 19 year old year had the American Standard Bible, it was revealed that all that Paul had wrote, she had torn from her AS, it became evident because when the discussion revolved around The Promised Abrahamic Seed, she was not able to find anything in the New testament properly, until one of the onlookers check her Bible and had told each and everyone one of us what was discovered, and after being exposed, she left the debate with a bang by "bashing Paul" if you will. The judge of the time was clearly not as religious or an avid Bible reader, hence he said, I remember vividly, that Satan must've been eating the pages of the girl's Bible because I see little to nothing about what Paul wrote. That being said, it was from there on out, well I would say days later, I wanted to know, even figure out if there was actually people out there who detests Paul, and I found out later on. It gets even worse when people tried to push the idea that Matthew, Jesus and others were somehow against Paul.

The Glasgow thread before I exposed you, you called yourself an honest reader. Luckily I saved your quote because I knew that day after you've been exposed, you'd wipe out everything. You called yourself this when I asked you if you read through the actual story rather that follow a video that spread misinformation. Not really when there is evidence. Your own response fits you however. Why would I when there is legitimate proof of which I had saved? Then perhaps next time, do not ask questions, get an answer, and go into an Alice in Wonderland laced warpath. How so? You want to know what else is shameful? Laughing at ideas conveyed by child services to better help and protect our children. Here is another one, stating the fact that God is okay with sex organ change. Here is another one, conveying the ideas and odd interpretations that has nothing to do with the Bible. As is with the Satanic lies professed by you in the other thread. That being said, despite both you and Witness being deluded and depraved concerning the Bible and other things, I have more pity for the latter than you because you are the type of fellow that are the oddballs of every Bible discussion be it a public domain, forum and or in person. Therefore, it is easy to deal with you if need be, especially regarding one who can't even give answer to his own claims. Aside from that I believe the last response regarding inspiration and Paul, there were some things addressed to you - please do not avoid them for a second time. Edit: I know you will react with a laugh. A sign of a man, because this is ALL you do when you get shut down easily. So laugh commencing in 3...2......1.....

Can you show me as to which false teachings I am grouping them with? Last I checked, you defiled the core teachings of the New Covenant and you put emphasis on a false view of religious church office. Even outside of anything regarding JWs, you yourself fail concerning the Bible, let alone understand prophecy. What what to expect from someone who calls themselves among the chosen ones, but lacks and twist God's word and even resort to cherry picking. You are not fooling anyone. According to me? I speak against falsehood, always, but what you are conveying is your view and opinion of a group you left. Falsehood is teachings of the mainstream that so called Christians will push, we can see this clearly in your Whitewash thread and your other thread regarding women. You speak of falsehood, yet you are the one to reduce Jesus' kingship to Disney Level proportions, and continue to give proclaim a message that is err. This is 100% evident because outside of this forum, people call your information to question, it isn't just me. Show me as to which lies I accept - I asked you this before but you said nothing. Then tell me if this is a lie. Did God save King Hezekiah, and did Jesus death enabled a Covenant for mankind? Or anything for that mater. If you actually went out to preach the gospel instead of spouting senseless things on this forum, you'd realize what people want to know regarding God, his Son and the Kingdom. That being said, the fact that I not only used the Bible, but constantly paraphrased even scholars and theologians from time to time will show how much this claim of yours stand in error. You do not know what it means to be Christian because if you had, you would not have shown the such a circus of a show in your Whitewash thread. Dare I quote something from Barnes unknowingly, you would claim it is a WT teachings, and I had done so before when using 1 John 4:1 to put you to the test, as I had done here now. That being said, it is funny how you make this claim, granted, you do not recognize any stone of the spiritual house and ignore all verses pretending to such, and only focus on the chosen ones and claim that only the chosen ones are of Jesus' Covenant. You are not fooling everyone, granted not one of your threads stands on grounds of solely explanation of Scripture. You sure? You agreed with Srecko here that Chloe and Deborah led a church when the Bible says otherwise. If the Bible does not convey such and you teach it as a truth, that in of itself makes you a hypocrite. This also goes for all such pertaining to the New Covenant concerning God's people. Aside from that, you attested that God had used Satan to help his people, when the Bible says otherwise, for God would not seek Satan's help to rescue his people, the very people of whom Jesus would come from in regards for God's Promise to be set in motion. If you proclaim such, by definition, you are a hypocrite. The fact that you call yourself a chosen one and spew such horrendous silliness, from time to time, blusters the fact that you are one, and it is not me or anyone on this forum who sees this, even outside of the form this is seen, to the point others have branded you as a fool, to which I did quote some who had said this in one of the threads regarding inspiration. Then show me. Am I a hypocrite for accepting what the Bible says concerning the Covenant? Am I one for believing when Hezekiah prayed to God, that God saved not just him, but the people out of the hands of vile enemies? I invite you show me and everyone else of how I am a hypocrite - which I will doubt, because you are extremely deluded and depraved and will evidently remain in silence when asked such things. As in sensitive, for I recall you made the claim of me being misogynistic, simply for using a quote that had the "W" in women lower cased..... If you get riled up from stuff like that, you cannot possibly be a preacher in the house of Christ. That being said, I even told you before, you can do better, so much better, but you continue to play with the silly puddy of falsehood and conspiracy. No one is knocking the fact that you do not agree with JWs on some things, but to speak falsehood is another story. And I always see Screko is always fond of you despite the fact both of you dwell in error, perhaps you agree with him regarding many things that do not make sense and the fact he himself defile Bible context, like you.

All the while the DNC is very quite own their own errors concerning the whole Russia thing after the Muller report. But people are saying despite all this Donald "Orange Man" Trump somehow was given a win.

And as a young boy I always thought glue was useless. I was way too quick to underestimate.

@James Thomas Rook Jr. @Indiana Excommunication was strong, firm and strict concerning the early church - a cut off from the church community. There were notable figures who had been kicked out of the church until the day falsehood evidently bombarded the church later on (beyond first century). More so, even in the days of Israel, people were cut off from the camp. Also I suggest you two take a read of this: http://shamelesspopery.com/biblical-excommunication/ There are several forms of Excommunication, however only ONE is true, and only ONE is practiced by those who understand it.

@TrueTomHarley Majority of Christians already know that God's Day, Armageddon will be the day that God will bring ruin to the wicked, and that both the meek and the righteous will be the only ones to survive the day of God's anger. Witness should know this because there was an image and a few verses that was conveyed by Witness that further proves such point. Such as Revelation 19:15 - From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 2 Thessalonians 2:8 - And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth and bring to nothing by the appearance of his coming. Some people ignore the fact of what God can do even limit him, as is with his Son, Jesus, watering down his role as a King and what Kings will do to defend their people. But the Bible tells us the truth in the matter, and the 2 above are simply just 2 verses as examples, with references and context of certain passages giving further information. That being said, Witness liked using Albert Barnes before, perhaps he is among the favorites, but I now doubt Barnes own words in which I agree with, does not sit well with Witness (Look at comm. for verse 8 - https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/bnb/2-thessalonians-2.html), hence the claim that concerning God's Day is something that JWs only believe, when the reality this is a core believe of True Christianity. But it baffles me that people think otherwise of God's Day. The slander against God in regards to afterlife/immortal souls and hellfire is one thing, hiding the fact of what God is actually going to do, is another thing. Granted this thread is in regards to Lawlessness, those of such are the ones who will witness God's anger, unless they work towards repentance, seeking truth, seeking God and his Son. Despite their wickedness, by means of Jesus' sacrifice, people actually have a GOLDEN CHANCE to change their ways before Jesus returns, and God allow them time to change. For man cannot forgive another man for great sin even if he or she repents, but God recognizes those who repents granted imperfect man, forgiveness takes time. King Manasseh is an example, as is with King David.

It isn't about support. It is about not taking slander as a truth, and I told you many times, I take issues with lies, slander and conspiracy, and as a truther, I speak against such. This also goes concerning of the Bible of which you commit to slander in majority of your claims. And this goes for everything. To paraphrase my own professor, there are many denominations, there are many beliefs. People can agree on some things and disagree on other things, and majority of those who disagree are the ones who speak lies without understanding of the other group is coming from. There are those who do not have to agree with faith groups, this includes JWs, but they will not accept lies about such groups and profess it as a truth, for not too long ago, hence my only issue concerning you is you start at a base and sparkle lies, and you also twist and mix Scripture either to push the lie and or push an untruth about the Bible itself. Not to mention even due to typo errors you even make ill claims of which you cannot prove. Actually the believe of God passing Judgment is of core Christian beliefs, even before the days of the JWs, this was the core, this is what Christians believed before the false teachings ended up entering the church with the teachings of immortal soul, new agism, hellfire, etc, for such believes are the core beliefs of mainstream Christianity and not True Christianity. God, according to the Bible, as wiped out the wicked, examples such as the bad ones of Noah's Day, what happened at Sodom and Gomorrah, Korah and his Household, the cursed people, Ba'al worshipers, The Egyptians, etc. In every instance, God done so to protect HIS people, of which is only begotten Son would come from, eventually grow older, preach the gospel, serving God's Purpose and Will to the day of his death and resurrection, and evidently to the day he will return to deal with God's enemies, for Jesus is the one to take up the sword. God's original promise is and always will be a strong one, in his dealings with mankind on earth, and his original promise continues through Jesus and it will continue to the point when Jesus returns, to the end of Jesus' millennial reign and to the end of Judgement itself. That being said, other than that you still mix verses even now. Also it is jarring to the eyes for you to use the term "Firstfruits" granted of what you conveyed in your other thread.

There is no problem in this regard, granted that the early church congregation members heeded Jesus’ command, and they were preachers of the gospel and spoke of what God’s Kingdom will provide and that Jesus will soon return. Also if you bothered to check the link the term “Spirit Led’ is explained, as I had addressed this to you 5 times before, so to say what it is or what it means when more than 5 times this has been addressed shows the you ignore a lot of what is said. You called yourself an honest reader, so there, we know this was all a lie engineered by your own hands. What are you trying to prove by means of this? Check 1 Corinthians 14:18 and 2 Corinthians 12:1-7. I even quoted this to you before, which proves you do not bother to read. I can even quote myself from this same thread: and I suggest you read, there is a link to Biblegateway, that could not have been easily amissed, but you choose to miss it purposely. Biblehub also conveys such. But non of this draws any information of what you conveyed concerning class and or group in regards to both the inspired and or not inspired. This is God's Order all over again in which you do not agree with Apostle Paul. Ok let's see it then. Because you did used Satanic lies. You even went as far as to say you did not say something and I linked your own words, after this you kept quite about it. You also made claims that were proven to be untrue, granted literal stones and a donkey (animal) cannot preach the gospel about the Christ, more so, you instated that silly claim when my answer was to Rook, not you, but then when you were put to the test, you cannot answer what you said. That being said, next time you say "According to the Bible" make sure the message actually conveys it, otherwise you are in direct violation of God's own Law found in Deut. 4:2 and your spirit has been tested to be quite a foul one. Slander is ALWAYS the tool of the loser. Because that statement is true concerning you. And it is not about donkeys, it goes back to what you addressed about people changing their sex, what you called God's servants, pushing a story as slander, making claim that a Prophetess owns a church and that a peacekeeper also own a church (in which both you and Witness has been proven wrong), the lack of knowing what a 501 is, and the list goes on. And every time you were called to question, you keep silent and or attempt to shift the focus elsewhere. Therefore, you do speak Satanic lies, and granted that 1 John 4:1 has been used, it can be said you are a Satanic Hypocrite. Therefore, all that can be said to you in this regard, is for you to repent. That being said, you can't defend Witness' "Satanic Influence" Claim because there was no evidence to that claim at all, as is with saying God literally gave order and or had help from his Adversary - which in of itself is also a Satanic lie. Then by all means - prove it. I can easily link to what I can address as lies concerning you, and how it can be pointed out you are a Satanic Hypocrite who believes stone walls and or stones on the ground can somehow convey gospel truth about Jesus.

Although we are not inspired and or infallible, even while old we can still maintain our wisdom and can spread our knowledge to others as is with the young. The passing on of wisdom if you will. There is some education that the parents teach which is done at the home, something of which the schools and or clubs cannot teach. That is why while one is young, do what they just now before they get older. That being said, there is a selected who knows what to do in terms of longevity of life concerning the body, therefore, as they age and get older, they are less effected compared to those in common society. But that is in the domain of health and eating, for right now the focus here is concerning Paul, the early church, lawlessness and inspiration.

@TrueTomHarley The problem with both Witness and Srecko is such has been pointed out to them before with biblical evidence as shown in the link to 2 threads I commented on a while ago. The both of them do not fully understand Apostle Paul either as evidence shown in another thread concerning Religious Office and God's Order of things as linked below: That being said, granted of what the Bible says in regards to miraculous gifts concerning those who are both inspired and infallible, that information is basic and elementary and for anyone to had missed that and or completely ignored it prompts a call into question if they actually read their Bible, more so, take in context (for Srecko stressed context before) and conveying the message. If context is given, they both will flip their lips. If context is paraphrased with a brief response, they say there is no back up to said response despite the fact it had been addressed well over 5 times to both of them. But back to the topic at hand, what is mentioned about Apostle Paul is true, as is with all prophets of God who had the gifts, which included abilities such as visions, whereas those after them, after the Apostles do not have such gifts, instead convey the good news gospel and the Messianic Age of the Christ whereas the spirit allows such ones to take up the commission to spread the gospel truths. As is done in the 1st century and onward to now.

Yes. Because it is a direct and yet brief response to what you asked. Perhaps due to gifts, the ability to go into trance induced visions, the ability to speak in tongues, etc. lol what? Paul did not come down from heaven... Paul became an Apostle, and he became a Christian. We clearly see that in the Bible that Paul was indeed both inspired and infallible due to the fact of what we read in for instance 2 Corinthians 12 and elsewhere concerning evidence of miraculous gifts expressed by those who are both inspired and infallible, more so, Paul wrote more an anyone else as well. I had, several times to you (hence both linked threads addressing you and addressing Witness), I merely paraphrased what I had said, and linked where I had addressed and explained such to you. But you do not care about verses because we can see what happen after I spoke in regards to those inspired and those who are not. Yes he was. Yes indeed - which is correct. Have you read into the miraculous gifts of what Paul conveyed? An example would be him having visions, and or speaking in tongues. Apostle Paul was given visions by means of the Lord (read 2 Corinthians 12, specifically the first 7 verses), both you and Witness should know this because you have both quoted from this chapter before, I do not see how you missed that - evidently purposely as both of you not uttered such here. More so, the outline title even reads Visions and revelations of the Lord [Paul's Visions and His Thorn] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Corinthians+12%3A1-7&version=ESV and aside from that it is said to be the history of the Book of Acts is full of such visions (other examples concerning visions - Acts 9:4-6; Acts 16:9; Acts 18:9; Acts 22:18; Acts 23:11; Acts 27:23). That is because the Bible holds truth to such elementary knowledge and it had been addressed to you well over 4 times, only this time I choose to link my response in full. Especially in regards to Apostle Paul, of which a whole lot of people seem to get wrong in what he says, even both you and Witness felt short of this... Remember, Biblical Facts. You said 2 classes and you tagged on the addition of roles. The line between the inspired and the not inspired is evident, in short, one can have visions, the other cannot. So either groups and or classes..... Make up your mind. Academic? I am not speaking of religious studies at all only the Bible's message in regards to the inspired and not inspired, so what was the point of bringing this up? The focus here is Elementary Knowledge in regards to basic hermenutics of what the Bible conveys, nothing more; nothing less. But that is quite the joke, granted you think education of religion has something to do with what is proclaimed from God's Word. That because I mentioned this to you several times already, and I simply linked my older response with verses to back up what I had said. You and Witness also made response before only for both of you to be corrected, nonetheless. Also the statement I made is actually true. The ability to have visions and the like died with the last of the Apostles, which is evident because students of the Apostles had no such ability and no one has up until now. And what is the reasoning behind this? Obviously I am not, neither you, or anyone here (Tom, Billy, JWI, Rook, etc). None of us, that is - if you were alive around Paul and John's time, clearly not. No one is inspired and or infallible, this goes for all persons granted that after the apostles died, no other person had ever been inspired and or infallible. The irony is you completely shot out the window of Christians, spirit led ones, who proclaim the message about the news and the Christ. Although they are not inspired/infallible, they still kept the churches in union and continued to convey the truth - back then to present day. That being said, any who makes the claim of inspiration and or being infallible in this day and age, 100% can have their spirit put to the test, and can easily be exposed to be a false prophet and or teacher, an example would be such as those who believe they see Hell and people there, that is a dead giveaway of a false teacher, one who claimed to be inspired when we know by means of the Bible, such abilities were for and only expressed by earlier prophets and Apostles of God. Clearly I do not, therefore unlike you, I do not call a people with the accusation of being under demonic influence despite the fact they are deemed strangers, more so, granted that no one is inspired or infallible. A nice try, but weak false accusation at most. I always use Scripture and always will. that is why I linked my full response, that is, if you bothered to check. Because if I repeat myself not, people will end up dwelling in their foolishness and come to claim that it is too much for them to take in. That being said, I suggest you check the link because the response of inspiration was directed to both of you in past discussions. Other than that, in regards to Inspiration, that is pure elementary knowledge, therefore, I, unknown to the both of you, paraphrased and or alluded to a verse and or passage. For Paul's inspiration should have been seen by the both of you, but we already know that not everything regarding Paul both of you agree with. Anyways, both links in regards to inspiration had been addressed, perhaps take the time to look at what is conveyed with biblical evidence that support what is said. You of ALL people should know that no man or woman since the days of the Apostle can have visions, clearly - this small shred of information had been amissed by you as well despite the fact you and Srecko alluded to such a while ago. The irony. I care for more factual information rather than feelings in this regards to the subject of inspiration as is with lawlessness. And you show us anywhere of which I some how made a Revelation? This is the donkey all over again - for you make a claim, but do not attest to and or give answer or evidence to said claim. Regarding Paul 1 Corinthians 14:18 and 2 Corinthians 12:1-7 - check all marginal references to. Also check the links to the other 2 threads whereas such had already been addressed to you, to Witness and to Butler. And yet both threads addressed such. The real question is have you taken the time to actually look at my response, of which had been addressed literally over 6 times concerning you and the other two. We can clearly see in the Bible and make the distinction of who had such gifts in regards to prophesying by means of trance filled visions. That alone is an indicator of who is actually inspired and infallible. That being said, you stressed context before, I ask again as to how you missed this?

Probably those who follow celebrities. I do have adversaries, who are up there when it comes to the world of independent media and other things. One of them being this woman, Yvette Felarca. I do not follow such ones, but I do speak against them. In short, I do not like those who influence violence and or commit to it to others, let alone inciting and infighting, preying and or making victims of unexpected ones of whom they deem opponents or enemies of an ill ridden cause.

Or that lol. But then you will be putting yourself in an extreme catabolic state.

After the whole Muller Report situation, no one seems to set their eyes on the DNC itself. But there are always those in play who wanted to push forth anything regarding Hilary and put Bernie at the edge. All in all, political theater, and nothing more. Also it seems way too many people still run Windows 7 OS.... The question is why? The teenager up the street can easily exploit Windows 7, therefore, not being up to date puts you at fault and at the same time one simply engineered their own demise by becoming victim in this sense.

For a second, I thought you were praising the death of someone. Then I looked further. Among all things, regardless of what anyone says, the Bible holds true to word of what will happen to the wicked. And it is going to be far worse of what we read of things in the Hebrew Old Testament.

My original response was in no connection with Equifax, more so, of her history and how convoluted she can be and or confusing with what action she takes, granted she is a Statist. As for Equifax however in regards to the topic just hours after her tweet she took back what she said. The tweet in question is the one above in regards to those who had fallen victim with the whole Equifax ordeal due to the 2017 data leak, and she rode that claim of which she brought up only to apologize later on. Only $31 mil has been set for payment, the more people who moves in to claim, the less others will get until there is nothing left, so essentially it isn't free money for all. In addition to that, her update in regards to credit is odd as well. That bar for $125 is not static either That being said, it is extremely difficult to trust Ms.Cortez or a Statist for that matter, granted of what we had seen so far.

Practically regarding what the Bible says, which is the proof right there. In regard to what I had addressed about prophets who are inspired, and prophets not inspired. Apostle Paul was inspired and infallible, just as Agabus, Jesus, John, etc. Paul, like the rest, was one through whom divine will as well as purpose was made known, for Paul, had the rest were proclaimers and or messengers who were inspired. Paul had the gift of prophesying all while being inspired and infallible, proving he had the holy spirit whereas others, also inspired and infallible, at the ability to commit to miraculous and powerful works, i.e. Moses, Elijah and or Elisha. As is shown in the Bible, we know that Paul was both inspired and infallible based on what we can pull from his history and what we read about him in the Greek New Testament. All of them are faithful servants of God, and were good Christians, but they were not inspired, and they were not infallible. Evident to this is due to unfounded information of such in the Bible whereas Chole was mentioned only once in the Bible, she was a peacekeeper, and was among her families household, as is being a member of the church of Corinth (as pointed out last time, in regards to you and Witness, she did not lead the church of Corinth, but sought the aid of Paul concerning the church, hence 1 Corinthians being written by Paul and sent to the Church of Corinth). Epaphras, is a friend of Paul and a fellow believer in the Christ, and he resides and or does his work in the Church of Colossae as is with preaching the gospel to them, he too received Paul's help and by means of this help, it pushed him to give aid to those in Laodicea and Hierapolis. Epaphras was also the one to have Epaphras went to Rome in order to bring forth words of up-build and encourage to the Church of the Colossians and he remained there for a time while Paul wrote his Epistle (Letter) to the Colossae Church. Clement of Rome, similar situation, but his focus was Philippi - both Clement and Epaphras were mentioned by Paul in the Bible [Clement 1 time, Epaphras 3 times, as mentioned already, Chloe was mentioned 1 time]. Christians are not inspired and are not infallible. Despite this, they are like prophets, although they do not have the ability to have visions and or have some divine action like some inspired prophets of old, they proclaim the message of the good new gospel (just like Clement and Epaphras) and they are spirit led ones in regards to preaching the good news gospel, as is with the Messianic Age. There is no Christian who is inspired today, something of which I told you several times in the past discussions. No. There are no two classes of Christians, and such a notion is absurd. There is only one church and her teachings are one, of which all in union with the Christ adhere to. Also, the last Apostle to die was possibly John, who was said to have lived to the near end of the 1st Century. He received the visions as read in Revelations while on Patmos, which he transcribed in the Greek New Testament. Moreover, Hebrews 1:1-2 indicates that the principal way in which God our Father communicates with people present day is through the Christ by means of the written Word itself, that is inspired by God, not through visions or dreams (hence Christians not being inspired and or infallible). Additionally, the Scripture advises Christians to be on guard against fallen ones, otherwise known as demons, for they are the ones who seek out and that attempt to mislead. That being said, such abilities that the inspired ones have has been done away with for such gifts were unique to the Apostles. It is even more evident granted going on into the 2nd Century, we do not see anyone inspired nor read of them, more so, even the students and or disciples of them are not even inspired.

Never thought I'd see the day Battle Royal is in Esports. Never a fan of BR genres, nor am I a fan of Fortnite, do not see the hype, but a lot of kids, even the ones I speak to, some of them like this game apparently. Next thing you know, this kid might face those such as Dr.Disrespect, Pokimane and or Ninja. That being said, good on him.

There is a whole lot I do not like what she has to say, especially when we live in a world where a message can be molded into something to commit acts that pin people against each other and or victim. What @TrueTomHarley mentioned is one of said things. Among all things, AoC is a Statist, among the fold that her and such ones want to help society by means of security and safety by prying off the freedoms people have, as some would say, the giving away of liberties by means of promises that never come and the continuous siphoning of said liberties continues and it never ending and it continues to take and never gives. Once power takes something, it does not give back what is taken. This is concerning the Green New Deal that not a whole lot of people agree with, more so, evening stating that the world would end in 12 years due to climate change with no evidence to back up this claim of hers, which was a willful one and not out of pure mistake. To add on to what Tom said regarding Amazon, it costed 25,000 people employment and such ones affected paint her as the villain.

I not only disagree, but I dislike this woman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and for good and many reasons as is with members of the Squad.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States of America (which is, as I say myself, unbelievable granted of how much people joked about this guy and laughed at his chances... They gave him the house) But that's political Theater for you.

The early Christian Church consist of inspired and uninspired men. Yes Paul was inspired, however, Clement, Chloe, and Epaphras were not, as is with others, regardless, all of them were faithful servants of the Christ and worship Jesus' God, and wanting to do right in their church of which they reside. More so, men and women of the church congregations, not all of them were inspired either, as imperfect ones, they fall short to sin and falsehood, example would be the whole situation with idols, The Temple of Artemis, those who became apostates within the church and were eventually kicked out. After the Apostles died, there is only uninspired men, however, such ones are still faithful spirit led Christians of God and followers of Christ, wanting to do right in the church.

@Equivocation @BillyTheKid46 The thing is, the Bible, even Isaiah, makes this clear. I see no reason for someone to ignore what the Bible has written. Jesus himself tells us the Scripture cannot be broken, John 10 and his God has stated to not take or add from the Word, Deut. 4:2. I do not see the reason to alter and or change what can clearly be read by any honest reader. There are those who think the New Covenant is only and soley for those of Israel, others have twisted it into something that only the Tribe of Israel will make up this covenant, i.e. only black people, concerning one group, who considers themselves as Spiritual Israel and that everyone else will be done away with, not to mention the total ignorance on God being impartial with men. Some thing that the New Covenant does not exist and that we all end up going to heaven, while those left on the earth will be left to their own turmoil, they also believe that demons would run rampant and sin will be all over, it gets a little bit to the extreme whereas some, a belief that one person who I had refuted time and time again, a Conspiracy Theorist who says she is Christian, claims that those who are wicked will also gain eternal life, but remain in, as she calls it a zombified state and or simply a zombie; putting emphasis that earth itself would be turned into a living hell, more so, God abandoning something he worked hard on creating. The further down the rabbit hole one goes, the more twisting and changing of what the New Covenant actually is all about. Others, simply present that Jesus' death never brought forth the New Covenant. In short, the insanity and confusion and the utter ignorance by means of someone being misguided in this sense is tragic, and sad, but what brings forth the action to refute is in regards of those who teach their falsehood to the unwary, those who do not know, and those who seek God and Jesus being easily duped by this teaching. One of the reasons I do not like interfaith, the Trinity, Mainstream Christendom, Kairos, etc. and I do not like those who brush over or twist all things concerning the holy spirit, Shema Yisrael, the Commission, the New Covenant, and who God is and what he will do, as is with the Christ.