Space Merchant

The Trinity is indeed a paganism concept. I hope you know what Attis this, Deserter, because it is not of the Church. And our early brothers and sisters never believed in the Trinity concept and the Terminology at all. It is not too difficult to read into how the church of that age operated, however, it ignored when it comes to concerning the new doctrines that is beyond the church.

@BillyTheKid46 When it comes to such things, people tend to ignore it, mainly when it comes to child abuse. Child and Neglect Services even profess information, but many, who are throwing rocks as glass houses do not want to heed a word they say. It creates problem now because they want to be the crusaders to the cause, not realizing that they are only making the monstrous beast that is child abuse and pedophilia even bigger. Aside from that a lot of people tend to play favorites despite true or false information.

There is also big news of victims forced to marry pedophiles and children dancing in homosexualized bars in the US, and should we say something about it, we are attacked for it. You have the society of this day and age promoting this, which will only fuel pedophilia even more. Clearly the child in question, his parents are not educated in this sense of child abuse. Aside from that, schools, even for you folk in the UK are teaching the young ones something that is not okay. As I had told you before, if you want to make change to a problem, teach the people. Negate attack, give aid. Clearly the lack of effort isn't going to do much, but only cause more and more abusers to enter and plague institutions, and with what is going about in today's society, expect things on a level that is catastrophe. No one is immune to pedophilia, as I address to you, not even the Jehovah's Witnesses are immune to that madness, not even the Americans, not even the British, no one. As with what went down in recent days, whose to say pedophilia are victims? When groups begin to proclaim and profess such, it will only create more problems for everyone.

When more of these things get out, it is going to spark rage and tension from those who had people suffer in those prisons and had to endure such vile treatment. As of late, Russian torture claims with evidence by form of media from months/years ago have been surfacing up recently by those who took ear to this situation regarding JWs.

@Srecko Sostar Ramzan Kadyrov has nothing to do with the ban of JWs. He is part of the Kremlin however his dealings with homosexuals is focused on Chechnya. That being said, there is a complete timeline of the events and thanks to sources and those who brought down the jesuismadian website, it is evident of what actually took place for the public eye to see. Lastly, most letters from the faith in question, as is all proclaimed message from anti-corruption folks, Russian folks who lost their homes was pushed to Mevedev, rather than Putin, I would speak of the State Duma, but that is a whole other beast on its own. Evidently, protest erupted in Russia during this, and ironically enough all of this unfolded after Cyrill got his spiritual energy from the south, and the Kremlin was paving the path for Putin to win an election. If you do not know who this is, it is this guy below: Ramzan Kadyrov The middle guy with the and assault rifle and the radio in hand

@Witness You never pointed out as to what exactly it is that is wrong here. You do realize how the church of the Christ harmoniously connects with the Christian people - right? Reasons why I did ask you a question: Why is it that John the Baptism baptized his people in the Jordan River? As a hint, this isn't concerning repentance in this regard, but pertains to baptism origin, in this sense.

For starters, the passage as a whole, Philip and the Eunuch is verses 26-40, excluding verse 37 because it is not an authentic verse. And no, what was said isn’t unbiblical. When a person has been studying the word diligently, becoming hearers of the word and embraces it, they will most likely seek baptism on their own accord, and as stated before, in doing so, they accept the teachings of the teacher, Lord Christ Jesus (Acts 2:38, 41). Moreover, it is already known that God sees such ones, even those of a household as holy. Now what you just posted was the part of the passage, Philip and the Eunuch (The Ethiopian Eunuch), and I take it you didn’t care to even explain yourself in this regard, in which I can see why. Acts 8:26-40 (excluding 37) A Eunuch was someone is tasked to take charge of beds in lodging room areas of secluded princesses, also refers to a man who has been castrated, as well as an ineffectual person. According to Deuteronomy 23:1, a Eunuch was not allowed to be part among the congregates of God’s people, however regarding the passage in the book of Acts, not a literal Eunuch, but rather someone who serves in some royal court regarding the person in the passage and he was likely a circumcised proselyte (not a Jew) who had mostly likely heard and embrace the teachings of God and having gone to the city to profess religious worship, only later on he learns of the message Phillip gave to him. In the passage this person, the Eunuch, was in under the Queen of Ethiopia, in charge of the treasury and in the passage, we know that Phillip crossed paths with this person and preached the gospel to him. Regarding the baptism, Christians attain knowledge and a precise understanding of God’s Word, again, those who hear and accept, capable ones, which is indeed biblical, and such ones soon accept the teachings of the Christ. Learning from Acts 2 regarding Pentecost, the people in the city at the time, were together in worship and in faith, already having knowledge of God, what is spoken of in the Hebrew Text, and the teaching of the Messianic Age whereas this was professed clearly, to all, regarding the Messiah, that is Jesus Christ, even by Simon Peter who proclaimed this strongly and the end result of such, those who came forth and took ear, listened, they heard, and they embraced, and obviously enough, they were baptized, taking up the teachings of the teacher, again, Jesus, hence the preaching of the good news gospel and the Messianic Age. Back to Phillip, when he proclaimed the word, the people believed and they embraced it after hearing it, and earlier on we see the people, such as those in Samaria, ended up being baptized (Acts 8:4-8, 12-14), and this in of itself is quite evident and clear because it is evident that after Jesus preached to a Samaritan woman, at the Well of Jacob, at the base of Mount Gerizim, and soon, the message that Jesus professed came on to the Samaritan people, they ended up putting faith in the teacher himself put faith in him and accepting what he taught (John 4:27-42), for the Messiah, the one that the Samaritans had waited for, paved a way for people such as Phillip to spread this message. Now, the Ethiopian Eunuch, had knowledge of God as well as knowing fully well of the Hebrew Text. Phillip proclaim the word, the message and fulfillment of the text regarding the Messiah, to which the Ethiopian Eunuch embraced this message, and evidently, he was (wanted to be) baptized, prior, he even asked to be baptized when they sought for a body of water, stopped the chariot, to commence the baptism (Ritual Washing as it was called) once a source was found, rejoicing afterwards. This but one of several examples, i.e. what we read about a guard who was about to commit suicide, but was given the message of the Christ, Jesus, and he was baptized, and eventually his household was baptized (Acts 16:16-24, 25-39). That being said, as you can see, a person from another nation, who was a proselyte, evidently sought baptism, and evidently, he received it, and it isn’t unknown here that he embraced the teachings pretianing to the Christ (good news gospel, Messianic Age, fulfillment of Scripture, etc.), even with what he knew and what more he heard from Phillip in this regard. Therefore, it is not unbiblical should any person from any nation, who embraces the word, attains wisdom in this sense and seeks baptism, etc. In the end, such ones are hearers of the word, most importantly, in regards to baptism and how it translates to Christian baptism, we become alive in the Will of God as well.

In layman's terms, certain pieces of clothing that is revealing and or professes a message can and will trigger someone, i.e. swastika attire triggers a reaction and or response, which can go from minor to violent in the slightest of escalation. And what was mentioned above is a red maga hat that sends people into a mental state of blood boiling rage, even the MSM gets into it sometimes, but you know what they say about the powers that be in all this of such nature and various things pushed out to the people. It is no wonder a good 20% of people in the US tends to stay away from such things. That being said, even despite such, I was never a fan of graphic tees, I keep it plain, always, even during the island days. Words can give off shots stronger than bullets, the same can be said of inappropriateness and immodesty, ammo of immorality.

@Shiwiii And your point? One who claims to be a mouthpiece must prove it by their word,i.e. are they following the or striving to follow the early church, as in, the church documents that is highly valued and so forth.Testimonies of Hell, do they profess this also or you are implying adding on here? Muslims also believe that they are the mouthpiece of Allah. New Agers believe they can attain a higher power. Ritualist believe they can become like gods and goodness. Mainstream Christian claims that a Triune God speaks to them and that they are the mouthpiece, should you not vote for Trump, then you are on the side of Satan. It isn't painstakenly out of the blue for someone to say that they are a mouthpiece of God. In the end, it comes down to who is actually professing the teachings of the early church, mirroring the church documents, applying Bible teachings and principles and making adaptable changes to profess and progress in the Christian faith. That being said, people who claim they have the holy spirit and say they witness Satan giving the punishment to men, women and children in a fiery place of torment, are in the wrong here, for God would never give Satan or his demons the satisfaction of such, as the mainstream pushes to believe, the end result pushes on to the people that God is the bad guy, the villain, when this is not the case, and regarding fire torment, God himself reacted to it, emotionally, even speaking on the matter that such would never cross his mind, cross his heard. And such ones are not even prophets inspired, so why such testimonies such as these spread throughout Christendom when the truth itself speaks for itself in the Bible? An honest man can see this for himself, and I assume you are an honest man if you actually contributed to what was asked. In short, no one should be profess El Shaddai as the one of badness here and this is the case with these individuals, and we have examples, Mario Martinez and those who are aligned with the Karios Movement.

Reasons why I alluded to the origins of Baptism, if you do not mind me asking, do you realize what took place after Jesus' ascension regarding baptism, and in regards to what I said before, you are aware of the very symbolic reason as to why John baptized his people in the Jordan River, right? That being said, if that was the case, you wouldn't be this focused on the term "Truther" alone when my response had more to say on baptism, this also goes into my older response regarding infant baptism, which is legitimately unbiblical. Then speak truth. Mixing spoiled milk with good milk is not good for anyone, and clearly, if someone takes a sip of such, they will speak up about it. One thing for certain, if you understood what is known about baptism in the Jordan River, you'd realize the joy of the people in regards to what this means, especially for John, it was not about repentance alone - it is far more than that, and the Bible speaks of this. You'd be wise to not speak of degrading, for last I checked, you shifted a spiritual structure so greatly, even the latter was against you. That being said, since the discussion is about baptism in of itself, why is it that John baptized his people in the Jordan River? And if I am to make the assumption, are you among the fold who halts one who seeks baptism and willingness to profess the teachings of the teacher, Christ Jesus who is Lord? Secondly I am sure you are aware of those who hears God's Word pretianing to baptism, yes? Speak your peace regarding baptism and if need be, it's origin. Hopefully no outlandish claims, and this time, direct. That being said, if the young ones seek, and they are ready and worked hard for it, why should we withhold them from progressing, they and their household? Withhold them from glorifying God even more alongside brothers and sisters who follow the teachings of the teacher as well? Unless, you are purposely forgetting Apostle Paul, who, in this sense, was not doing things or saying things out of opinion.

The problem with the US is when they create and or make problems that end up blowing up into something that is hard to contain, they commit to chaos to see if they can resolve the problem, which can and has put bystanders at risk. It will end up being the same when they commit to hunting down this person, and with that kind of money they bring forth, there is sure to be blood to pay before they could catch him. It is both tragic and a shame regarding the state of condition and all things we are in now.

@BillyTheKid46 Russian torture is something that not many Russians talk about. Those who commit these acts would claim it is not true until information and or proof of it surfaces, and then suddenly after it surfaces, it as if it does not exist, but the scars it left on the victims and their family persists. Things such as this example: https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-makarov-prison-torture-claim-walks-free-serving-term/29521051.html

I love that book. With each chapter, with each situation, you start to realize how things of today mirrors that of the book of George Orwell. That being said, it is very tragic as to how no one sees the timeline, and or the truth of the matter with all things Russia, you'd think people vanishing off the streets in some parts of Russia was a red flag, but no. The irony is, such ones would applaud Russia and side with them on their actions, but in the end, they would be overwhelmed by the one they called and saw as an ally. Reminds me of the Harlot and the beast, and how the beast turned on her.

@James Thomas Rook Jr. The crazy thing is I spoke of a dark age regarding Russia in the comes days. Ever so slightly from that response I made a while back, things are coming to a fruition. The Russians who are not for the Kremlin/ROC see it, the West, and other parts of the world. Whatever the Kremlin does, their allies is for them, which you can see a contrast regarding 2 superpowers with powerful allies under their belt.

This. This is one of the things I have seen time and time again. There are those of the former faith that will speak up against disgruntled ones who have gone off unhinged in action, and their conquest to be aggressive increasingly i.e. anywhere there is a person of that faith community they purposely go after them relentlessly, even if said person is doing personal things. It tends to go off the rails even further when former ones actually side with their former faith to speak against apostasy, and in doing so, these persons are shamed and or hunted down in the social space, even in public. Apparently, they care not for who you are or your background because of whom you follow and or what you represent, they feel that attacking is an obligation, they seek to provoke and when or should the provoked do something, the provoker will use that as means to take action and so forth, which is also another problem. Indeed. The UK also has grooming gangs whereas some know of it's existence, but does not speak of it nor care of it. For me, I to not agree with a lot of what Tommy Robinson has said and or stand for, however, he made this known and the UK government arrested him for it some months back. It would seem that child pedophilia, when it comes to disgruntled ones, they, the way I see it sometimes, using it as a front to go after those that do not like. The focus should be on abuse taking place everywhere, but not a sole group alone. Another problem is that such sparks vigilantism whereas at some cases, the one who seeks the abuser, or the abuser, or victim succumb to further harm and or problems. That being said, it is a mixed bag altogether, reasons why many tend to educate, for it is a great tool and or, in this sense, weapon, to use in this mater, be it to prevent a form of abuse and or to deal with a situation if someone is abused, so one wouldn't be left in the dark on what actions to take. But alas, it is a very very cruel world out there, I would say you think wildfire that is pedophilia, let the people bear witness of what is coming very soon in regards to a specific community.

A combination especially to a number of occasions I told you to stop mixing Scripture. And it was more on that, one discussion regarding God's order whereas you made the claim I am misogyny when I am not, you used typos against me 2 times whereas the latter information rebukes you. No Scripture? If I recall, these can easily be looked up, so it is best you not assume out of the blue in this regard. If that was the case, why assume it was a title? Plus I had stated this, even alluded to this in the past whereas I told you time and time again regarding you pressing conspiracy and or a falsehood as a truth, i.e. assuming Satan was the one who took it upon himself to go after the Egyptians, and or twice where you twisted strongs, assuming a metaphorical use was literal, only in these situations, you have been refuted with absolute undeniable truth. You said it yourself, you do not go that deep into things, but quick to jump on the caravan when something that is correct is professed. Then take up the advise I told you last time, to stop scraping your scraping and bruising yourself, when it comes to seeking truth, but you continue to do so time and time again. And since the discussion is about baptism, it should not be alien to you as to all things pretianing to such. Actually no. I gave you a legitimate definition of the word. a Truther does not align or identify him or herself with anything pretiaining to conspiracy, or cults that profess conspiracy. That being said, you just said the term was unknown to you, need I post an actual link of the word itself which is, in common use, of those who profess what is truth in the sea of lies? And yet before you made a response to them a number of times. In fact, you made a couple of responses, i.e. inspired and not inspired prophets. You're not too bad yourself with your pear novels, but that being said, we should not be diving deep into conspiracy and or falsehood and profess it as truth at all. Now pretianing to all things regarding baptism, it should not be unknown to you of the eagerness of those who seek to be baptize, to follow the teachings of the teacher and so forth, and in the end, wanting to show a total and great service to God the Father. There is a reason I alluded to the origins of baptism, but if you want to speak truth, I allow you to go first in this regard, since it seems people want to alienate the context of Jesus' words and to plight over claims of twisting. That being said, a bit of humor, if you mix verses again or give conspiracy as a truth, I will give you an Encyclopedia, signed off by the Trinitarian, cos.

I did not see your response til afterwards. Regardless, noted.

@JOHN BUTLER Just next time never use speech mockery, in this sense, Ebonics. The type of speech isn't the best to express and or explore, when in some situations, be it of a person of said community and or knows such ones of said community, rich or poor, can easily trigger, provoke strong, and often negative responses - this is not an just fact, it is absolute and certain lines can nearly be crossed. As for you @Equivocation, when it comes to linguistic mockery, especially the use of mock speech, in this case, the use of Ebonics, sometimes people do not know any better, in Mr. Butler's case, he believes misconceptions, so that alone shows. Other than that, assuming leads to conflict of such things, hence the outcome of the off-topic discussion. Unfortunately, things tend to go on like this when things get a bit too off-topic, ironically enough it began with "uncle". That being said, picking up with what was addressed earlier on, pertaining to what you said, child, mini skirts and very tight clothing is immodest, plus in some cases people wear such to cause a scene, be it in the common church and or workplace, draw attention and to trigger, such wants see to increase their value or attractiveness, in this sense, the wrong way. Since you are a teenager, some of us who are raised in the 90s can relate, there are, even in my days, young ones who dress up in such a way that is inappropriate, reasons why in some cases, schools had to regulate things, in some cases, enforce, and treated a ruling of a strict dress code. An example would be cross-dressing, and in some cases, for girls, shirts and or tees that are bra straps or exposed shoulders, very short low cut shorts and or jeans, anything that exposed the body way too much and so forth. Since race is being discussed here to some degree, sometimes due to the hair style it can trigger people, even a teacher. Regarding immodest clothing, such in this case would cause schools, those in authority, to react, as stated before regarding all things pretianing to teaching children, some teachers are not always there to teach and have something else in mind, such as these recent events regarding female teacher(s), example. Now when it comes to Christians, we shouldn't be going on about the things of this world when it comes to dressing up, this goes for anyone, anywhere, for like us, they know the difference between modest and immodest, and would not go about their own understand of this sort vs. that of God. And someone brought up something regarding suits and ties being traditions of men, the answer is NO. A suit and tie is just clothing, it would only pretian to traditions of men if said suit and tie is sporting something that is very unpractical to Christians and or the church. But it seems the sense of style that derives from the world, actual works of men who tend to shift things from modest to over the top immodest, this has indeed become a problem. To quote a Christian woman who spoke about this matter "We shouldn't be deliberately causing anyone to stumble. Would you wear a muscle shirt and tight jeans to church." That being said, this modest vs. immodest stems not just from Christians, but to others as well, and even in public places. And it has gone to, in a sense, to the extreme, over sexualization of clothing as well, welcoming it to the public eye as if it is no issue to the people of the nation, which results in a Red vs. Blue situation whereas there are those for it and those against it. But of course, their fruit becomes the problems of many. Th're shall beest people, those f'r 'r 'gainst. In the endeth t cometh thy burden at which hour t cometh to thy doth'r.

A Truther is someone who, in this sense, seeks truth to an event and or situation, someone who does not play into the MSM narrative and or conspiracy, let alone government schemes and so forth that is being pushed on to the people on a TV set, phones, etc. what have you. This should be very evident to you, Witness, when time and time again I uttered what I have been saying about accepting conspiracy and or falsehood, which goes back to our very first discussion, and even before that, regarding the very man who debated with me regarding Church Fathers. It is not much of a title, per-say, one is usually called this in regards to what was stated in this response you are reading, and or correlates with the many times I addressed to you about falsehood and conspiracy, unless you've forgotten that? You once said to me you do not delve too deep into certain things, but I do, to separate truth from lies, and speak truth and refute lies. That being said, it is a surprise how you missed I brought this up a couple of times when I responded to you on a number of occasions, both directly and indirectly in a sense. one who believes that the truth about an important subject or event is being concealed from the public by a powerful conspiracy.

@Equivocation Not every child such as you are fortunate. I can tell you this, some have it greater than you, some have it vastly worse than you. Children, if not taught, if not discipline, they can get into some crazy things, which brings me to when it comes to protecting out children, what today's day and age is mentally feeding our kids. Bullying is always a problem, a good friend of mind took her life over it due to the embarrassment of something immoral, which she was seduced into doing. The one who is the aggressor, in this case, tends to be, at some point the victim. We can teach and educate in this regard, but we cannot prevent it, just as we cannot 100% stop, abuse, gun violence, war and other things, for people think there is a miracle plan to causing all such things to perish, but they need to open their eyes to the reality of the situation. Some situations can be prevented, others cannot, some can be halted, some blow up into some bigger and difficult to control, etc. Complying, in this regard, is used on default by many, even among the trained. They, if they have an opportunity, can act, if they know what they are doing, the latter would be someone taking action and failing whereas it could lead into problems and someone losing their life. So regarding this, some people would have to play ti safe and smart.

Endure and press on in any situation. There is always a way to profess and progress, even in the hands and eyes of those who wish to destroy you. Fearing man, you cannot, but fear God you must, for God is greater than all men.

Everyone loves/hates CGI in this day and age. Back in the 90s, even in the 80s you have special effects with puppet costumes, now you got 3D and green screens doing more of the work for you.

@James Thomas Rook Jr. You wouldn't believe it if I told you, I rarely watch television or watch movies. More of a book person, however at rare times I am usually invited to watch something, that is, if it is acceptable. That being said, if I had to watch anything, it would be independent sources in related to current and or recent events, past, and or upcoming; breaking, etc. Now, if we step back in time, in my younger days, I spent no more than an hour and 30 minutes watching television, mostly cartoons, and at rare cases, documentaries, dramas. One drama in particular I can't remember clearly, but it lasted like 6-8 hours, had to watch parts of it, and even during my teenager years, that same drama was an assignment. There's also a black and white movie, can't remember the name, about a man about to be hanged for a crime he did not commit, and suddenly he escaped, only to realize that it was all a dream, other things pertaining to history, etc. That being said, I keep such to a minimum, for nowadays, time can be spent doing other things, that sitting in a theater or a couch.

This alone is unbiblical. A Child, in this sense, an infant, and or baby, shouldn't be baptized at all, and the guilty of sins narrative is absurd. Only those who are capable of hearing the word and the like, seeking God and his Kingdom, and the teachings of his Son, Jesus; such ones can be baptized, regardless, for they seek it, and they shall have, and benefit in their trek of spiritual growth. That being said, I did talk about this before: Of course. Pretty much the jest of what I have been professing throughout since the other Bible discussions elsewhere on here. Yes, ritual washing concerning the Israelites, as is with why John the Baptist baptized his people in the Jordan River itself. Find the river on a map, and look to the left, and look to the right. The image shown to Mr. Butler, the location in question is Jacmel, Haiti. Baptized in 1997-1998. So I was quite young, but even before baptism I pressed forth in everything pertaining to Scripture and of God. In my case, I am just as eager as the next guy in wanting to be close to the True God and seeing his great Kingdom, and awaiting for the one of whom he installed to sit at the throne to rid all badness from the earth. Those who I known, who had perished, I wish to see them also. Reasons why since the day I opened a Bible, I continued on ever since, and growing up, some young ones whom I came across, even to this day, even among the homeless, I share the Word and give example. It also plays into the fact that I am a Truther, to some degree.

@James Thomas Rook Jr. Although I do not fancy graphic shirts such as these, but aren't you a bit too old for such things? Also speaking about graphic shirts, sometimes an image or a word, on said shirt, can trigger someone and or a group of people, perhaps trigger either of the sexes or both. And we already know the situation with an example professed above. @Equivocation The haste of such situation's escalation is indeed fast. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/02/27/massachusetts-woman-who-knocked-off-mans-maga-hat-faces-deportation/3002085002/ That being said, you do realize how events such as these play out in the global mafia of things, right? Then again, I would save you the Truther Banter, I profess from time to time, for I had said such regarding the compact already.