Space Merchant

@Kosonen The news clip is of the MSM. ISIS has and always will be bothering the Syrians regardless of what the Americans are doing. It should be a clue to you and many as to the reason why they do not give you the number of US soldiers in Syria. The Americans did little themselves because they were helping, so to speak, a terrorist front who were among the rebels. That being said, no one will be forgetting that this is just another repeat of history, as it was in Bush's day and in Obama's day, moreover, US allies, Kurds, care nothing more than to take up land for themselves, reasons why they allow people, even Christians to be defiled by ISIS militants. The biggest problem right now is Israel, for they do not like the idea of Iranians being in Syria, and this pull out will only anger them. Do not always believe what the MSM is telling you, otherwise you will end up as speaking of it as though it is the truth.

Can you prove that I am of the world when it is already evident how I have been professing against the world, it's governments, agendas, ideologies, and lack of knowing who the True God is? For last I checked, I recall defending God's Order, just as Paul has rather than negate it to nothing more than an opinion to not be taken serious, moreover, I defended Christ's Kingship to which you watered down, and only people who take up the religious ideologies of the world, in this sense, waters down Christ's Kingship and the Church he has built. In regards to what I have been saying, it would be hypocrisy on their part if they were an ECOSOC, but all information expressed DPI status, whereas a DPI has no hand or say in UN affairs whatsoever - if you got prove of this, DPI NGOs having the role of a ECOSOC NGO, I invite you to share - which is rather unlikely. There are about 5,083 NGOs with an ECOSOC status, a large number of them benefit from the United Nations by means of partaking in UN affairs. That being said, if I am vocal against Agenda 21, Population Control, the New World Order, The One World Educational/Religious System, and lastly, The Global Mafia, why in God's name would I accept anything ECOSOC? I invite you to prove your case. Then prove to us here and now what United Nation Affairs have the Jehovah's Witnesses partook it. Perhaps since in the 1990s they became an NGO, did they partake in anything in relation to Agenda 21 before the new era of NGOs took effect? Stuff like this I find unlikely because you title of ignorance befits you if you do not realize the difference between a DPI and a ECOSOC, moreover, you ultimately ignored what the Resolutions have stated, which paints a bigger paint of ignorance on your behalf. You said it because, even admitted, you do not know these things, but you are quick to jump unto the boat of conspiracy in regards to a man who has taught the masses that a DPI and ECOSOC are one in the same, when legitimate information proves otherwise. It should have occurred to you as to why Mr. Zelda didn't explain the differences. I've already named an ECOSOC NGO, here is an example The name of the NGO is Advocates Abroad, it's founder is named Ariel Ricker. The NGO Status 501(c)3 non-profit organization founded in 2016 and it holds an ECOSOC status, thus enabling them to have United Nations affiliated affairs, as there is an abundance of evidence of them and UN tasks; the connection. This ECOSOC NGO has 10 Sponsored and several extership programs, in addition, this ECOSOC NGO has the backing of the International Bar Association, with the combine united of Universities that are enablers of the UN cause in regards to migrants. Because of this NGO, be it causes legal and illegal, it will ruin civilization as we know it, and this NGO in question has been going about illegal means due to it's founder, although the damage is already done, the UN still benefited because it only thickens the plot for their agenda regarding migrants. And this is just one NGO, to which them having sponsors to begin with is already obvious they have met the criteria, allowing them to complete the requirements in order to have a hand in UN affairs. You have to have been living under a rock if even the basics of such information is that alien to you. That being said, read the Resolutions again because although you admit you no knowing of such things, I suggest you start now, regardless This is a list of all ECOSOC NGOs: http://undocs.org/E/2016/INF/5 So why is it they didn't it included the UN agenda regarding religion into all JW churches? Ted Turner was very vocal about it in the early 2000s for he said all of us believe in one God and we view God differently, that it should not prevent us from getting together. All the religious NGOs there were ECOSOC affiliated. That being said, you claim UN affairs yet cannot bring forth to claim said affairs that is exclusive to ECOSOC NGOs. It is not a matter of slicing it, it is a matter of ignorance to information - of which you are expressing, granted, you cannot name a single UN agenda expressed by this faith community - at all. So now you are switching to politics? You do realize what the United Nations is, right?

@Kosonen How much trust do you put into Fox News regarding the situation of Syria? For today most of the MSM has given a bit of misinformation, not shedding the whole truth about Syria to the general public.

Such an act is not something to be professed by those of any Christendom faith and or Islamic faith and or other. That being said, I provided a scenario to you, Equivo and Rook - how would you 3 go about the situation? what would you do? Since something of the like has been brought up by you, stuff like this one must be serious about. An example I can being up today is a young man died today even though he complied (though in this rare situation, this guy was seeking blood), I will leave it at that, and since the killer is at large, the community of which I am speaking about is at an edge as police seeks the murderer. A close friend of mine knew the person, and was nearly victim only due to the fact he fell a slept at work for a mere 15 minutes, should he have chosen to go out to that area that was targeted, about 15 minutes a day, he would be in a morgue as we speak. Things like this we have to be serious about.

You were not being ironical. Being ironical means to pertain to, of the nature of, exhibiting, or characterized by irony or mockery: I only made a response because the lack of context in regarding Scriptural Law and the borderline. You were not being ironical about women either. Macho attitude, the act of showing aggressive pride in one's masculinity. Truly I saith thee, as to which moment in time didth I profess such? You of all people should know, Srecko, you kind of asked for that one.

@TrueTomHarley The 777 Crew was on this recently, so was Radio Europe. Ironically enough, some who brought this news up were using WoA's video from May 2. @James Thomas Rook Jr. It's persecuted. Also I remember showing you that Russian Hit List Website that was targeting political heroes (to keep people at bay before Putin's election), hackers, and religious folk that includes JWs. I am confirming today that as of recently 5-6 days ago that website had been taken down. As we speak, Cyrill must be fuming mad right now, he is already uneasy with Ukrainian Christians as of recent also.

It is crazy to me how people do not understand the difference. This is the same case with how some Christians feel about Ted Turner's comments regarding God back in the day whereas the United Nations had been slowly working on gathering religious leaders and on the other side of the spectrum, you have the Agendas. And speaking of Agendas, I have a lot to say about recent events of Syria, but that will be for another thread.

A DPI NGO has access to these resources: Books/publications film and audio libraries photo libraries access to meetings language courses briefings seminars conferences film screenings commemorations concerts the DPI NGO Resource Center In order to have access to these sources, the JWs and or Watchtower, the person whom them who is a researcher, had to register in order to gain access, he/she was even told that to gain access to said material, they must be a DPI NGO, this resulted in them getting accepted about a year later. The world of NGOs took a huge change, and or in the progress of a new change - a new era, as said by them in the mid 1990s, moreover, onward 1998 into the 2000s the changes took effect, and there was going to be some changes with the NGOs, both DPI and ECOSOC alike. Clearly the JWs didn't want to be controlled by UN officials when the changes were finalist, hence they prepared their registration. But then the centre-left (technically the Guardian to this day is pretty much a left-wing newspaper comp) came to their doorstep, The Guardian, who most likely did their story prior to the registration being finalized, granted becoming an NGO and leaving an NGO takes some time - literally. So technically - it is like a library card. In a sense, if I wanted to borrow Rook's Historical Account Series, I have no chance to take said material because in order to do so, I must be a member of said library facility, more so, to even gain access to said area to retrieve the books I need to make research for, be it self-research, school and or other. Now a member, I also see Rook's Historical Account Series (Gold Edition), which has more detailed and structured information in said series than the latter, in order to get that, I'd have to extend my membership in the Library and pay out some cash - that this, I can choose to refuse and or decline. This isn't the best example, but hey, I am thinking libraries right now. All in all regarding NGOs, there is some power the ECOSOC NGOs have over the DPI NGOs, and ECOSOC is more United Nations affiliated than DPI. Since the changes in the late 90s and onward to present day, DPIs and ECOSOCs can merge with each other, a good example of this is the Family that is of a Catholic Religious Order I mentioned the other day here. ECOSOC tagged NGOs also get sponsors and or from other ECOSOC, hence the usage ECOSO sponsors, which provides them with the money to do things to build up their NGO and do the works of the United Nations.

Ironically enough - nothing here states the Watchtower has met the criteria requirements to even allow them to have a hand in UN affairs. To add more fuel to the fire, nothing here even states they are an ECOSOC. Your dance has ended before you hit the main stage, Witness. Re-Read the UN charter and Resolutions presented of which you had ignored.

@Witness https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/70781-if-armageddon-happened-how-would-we-all-be-killed/?do=findComment&comment=1105930 So the question would be, which of these represents the League of Nations, in regards to you, if you do not mind me asking? I ask to see if you will contradict yourself here in contrast to your last response in a past discussion. JWs are taught again and again that it is a blasphemous image….to stay away from. And they continue to do so even to this day, as we are seeing with this recent thread. To find out that WT leaders dappled in ‘blasphesmy’ led to many people leaving their hypocritical teachings behind. Do you have a statistics of a great multitude of them leaving their faith community within the 1999-2003 range, Witness? Time and time again I have brought up statistics regarding Religions of Christendom and the number of adherents they have, even the source I profess do not make things up. That being said, it would only be blasphemous and a complete distrust to the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ faith community if the Watchtower did renew, if the Watchtower was not just a DPI, but also, an ECOSOC. What was “Jehovah’s organization” doing, by cavorting with the Beast, and the world? Nope. Because they haven’t given in to the United Nations agenda regarding Religion. If that was the case, the Jehovah’s Witnesses would have been long gone away from Restorationist roots, they would try to focus on their practices and beliefs, while being open and acceptive of Interfaith ideologies as professed by the United Nations in terms of Religion. Moreover, Jehovah’s Witnesses would be the religious types to accept things such as Gay Marriages into their churches because the United Nations will have a control over those who have shown support, more so, their view on same sex marriages and other things would be altered greatly so they do not displease the ones they support, the UN – should that be a reality, which it is not. Again, I ask you, do you know which Wild Beast you are talking about when you confused them before? To a JW who sincerely thought he was “safe” in “Jehovah’s spirit-directed organization”, such news can be devastating and nauseating, physically and emotionally. Not really, that is, if you understand NGOs, how they operate, what they can and or cannot do, what they can apply for, what they cannot apply for, which status allows support of the United Nations should they meet the requirements for a criteria. The Resolutions are out there, even the documents. I do not see why one such as yourself must ignore them in such a manner. Those that taught others to be "no part of the world" are fully immersed in its activity. Because they, Restorationist as a whole, be it a lone individual and or organized are not part of the world at all. Lone Restorationist are on a whole other level, but it is what it is. Thank you for linking the Six Screens "Healing River" program. . No problem, but the irony here is even though that argument was lost on your part, that former JW who knows quite a bit of trust funds and benefactors has been immortalized here for all to see. Therefore his response makes your claims in that discussion- false, perhaps more false than the idea of JWs having weapon bunkers and poisons under their churches to commit some Jim Jones-like of an attack on themselves and others, or perhaps more false than the belief JWs having stocks in women’s lingerie and a Japanese Gaming company. All of which you have been refuted on, Witness. It reminds me to post Pearl’s latest soundcloud which was very good. Sow as it Pearl that caused you to mix verses time and time again, contradict things even going as far as to twist the context of things in the Bible i.e. you calling God’s angel in Egypt Satan. Was it her that caused you to do this? If that is the case, I can see why many as refuted some of her claims and also point out the ideas of minor hate-preaching rather than preaching the gospel. Which befits you because, all your posts does not come in terms of explaining Scripture, you only use Scripture to defame a single group only, time and time again, you do not even dwell on using Scriptures against false doctrines that was never of the Church – not once. About this, you just don’t get it, SM. Actually I do – JWs do not own weapons in their churches. JWs are benafentrines as mentioned in my repost link, which lines up with what that former JW has said. Furthermore, if you have forgotten, I had provided proof of people seeing Mr. Fearon as madman, let alone his connection to a known figure that enabled Mr. Fearon to have a bit of a gain. Not only that, Fearon followers have been exposed, and whom Fearon has sided with in order to have a monetary gain, as with a gain of converts – not even the most disgruntled JWs side with Fearon – which is, on your part, quite hysterical. This forum is an avenue to air opinions and facts. Then why ignore the what an DPI is and an ECOSOC is regarding NGOs? Should that be considered as facts rather than ignoring it, and or using Mr. Zelda who does not utter such, in as much using pockets of information to equate the two as the same when in reality it is not? I am surrounded here by the majority who disagree with me and I don’t agree with them. It is not about disagreement, it is about understanding, in this case, what an NGO is, what allows an NGO to support the United Nations in terms of meeting a requirement to do such. A DPI alone cannot support the United Nations at all, and the only way a DPI can do that is if they meet the requirements for the Criteria, a DPI can have a say or not if they wish to do support and or do the bidding of the United Nations – read the Resolutions properly and the history of NGOs. In the case of the Watchtower, they were a DPI NGO, without an ECOSOC status they are and never were in any position to support the United Nations, examples would be, as I mentioned here and another thread population, local/global thinking in terms of UN ideologies, agenda 21, even 2030, both of which are in some form of motion to this day. Now the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Watchtower, as stated before would look like major hypocrites if they were ECOSOC, for an ECOSOC are the types to show total support and being under submission of the UN, more so, JW church leaders would not truly be the leaders of their faith, but rather, the UN, which is currently the head of all things religion regarding world religious leaders of this day and age. They knew if they remained and succumb to this new change in the era of NGOs, mid to late 1990s, they’d putting themselves in a bad spot, thus they see the mistake and dodge a couple of bullets. As for agreeing, even the UN website sources shed some light on the differences and changes in the world of NGOs. You do not have to take my word from it, granted most of my information from UN sources from the 1960s to present day whereas the majority of the focus was the 1990s-2003s. Should I leave because I personally feel JWs have been misled by lies? If you think they are lying, then the information they profess would be false. You’d have to prove that the Watchtower was an ECOSOC, therefore, the claim of UN support would stick. So far, you have not brought this up, so your claim remains unfounded. Until I’m told to leave, I’ll stay, You do not have to go anywhere. The bottom-line is understanding not to twist things, understanding to not profess conspiracy as truth. If Mr. Zelda does not tell his audience the difference between an ECOSOC and a DPI, let alone the information that stems from both, bur rather, he counts the both of them as the same, and you accept it and tell people here to go to the video and see for themselves – how can you not say you adhere to and accept conspiracy? This isn’t the first time either, for you do this, over and over again, and conspiracy to a truther will only cause them to make a response. It is the same argument I make with those who considers false flags and some comments from conspiracy theorist as legitimate proof. People can make mistakes by taking up facts that at times isn’t verified properly – I make some mistakes sometimes when I do not have access to my information and own up to it, but never would I, or anyone else will continue to go about something over and over again as a truth when it is really false, for such isn’t even a half-truth, which makes said conspiracy the downfall of the one who professes it. I believe there are truths that need to be aired to those that were once my “brothers and sisters”. Then when one of your own speaks the truth about something, why ignore him? There is a good reason as to why I linked that information. Should Pearl stop using Six Screens because the majority there hold a different view? She is not endorsing the programs of others. If an another choice is easier for her, she will change. You should take the time to research and learn things, even re-learn things on your own. Holding the hands of Pearl time and time again attest to you mixing things up, as evident in all the discussions I had with you. Even outside of this forum, there are those who speak of Pearl in the same way, for some of what she says confuses them, more so, some information process is more targeting of a another faith rather than a legitimate church falsehood. Witness, people like this never change. For the meantime, it is an avenue that draws many listeners – JWs who have been harmed or disgusted by two-faced doctrine and want to know spiritual truth. But it didn’t stop you from accepting ideologies that are accursed. One thing Solider of God made clear is regarding Jehovah’s Witnesses is that some people agree with and disagree with them, but former members of the faith who leave, some, end up taking in ideas and practices that are not Christian, and yet considers their actions as Christian. He pointed to some very critical facts on how people can be Lukewarm as well. An example would be with the holiday that is coming up, Christmas, for most former JWs who leave profess, even preach out wrong JWs were about Christmas and attest that Christmas is a Christian holiday, to which there will be those for and against this notion – things of that nature. Kel, another Christian pointed out that disgruntled ones end up losing themselves after leaving the faith and that they can pose a danger to themselves and others. It provides a similar outlet just as this forum has provided. I don’t agree with all that Jason Zelda believes, but I do appreciate what he has exposed as hard facts about the WT. If you do not agree with Mr. Zelda, why use him again? You used him sometime before to bring forth your claim, both times, it was a failure on your part. If Mr. Zelda professed hard facts Why did he equate both NGO statuses as the same without making mention of the vast difference between the two? Why not point out that only one of these statuses actually supports the UN, the other does not? This goes for the other discussion, if Mr. Zelda was in the right in terms of trust funds, why did a former JW exposed Mr. Zelda by commenting legitimate facts on how the trust funds actually work and goes on to speak on stocks and other items? This former JW has actual experience in that field, hence why I engraved his message on your other thread, which can be seen from the repost. You have fallen in the same trap that Jason spoke of, when he addressed shunning. And what trap is that? Excommunication is also of Church Discipline. You have snubbed your nose and lumped Pearl together with all others on Six Screen. If that was the case, with I made some responses before, why did it take several discussions later for you to even say that? Fearon didn’t teach Pearl to mix Bible verses. Pearl didn’t teach Fearon about Poisons JWs use on themselves and others. This is a view the Pharisees were good at - narrow-minded accusations that Jesus was a sinner because he spoke and ate with tax collectors and harlots. The interesting thing is, they listened; But you are playing the role of the Pharisees regarding them. You made the accusation that they support the United Nations, you also make no utterance of them being a DPI and or give proof of them being an ECOSOC. As for OSCE, all DPI are supposed to represent, none of them attest to United Nations’ agenda at all. Saying speaking about one’s persecution, speaking about one’s ability to deal with having their church burned down and or their Bibles, speaking about one’s in ability to successfully worship due to opposition – those are not UN agendas regarding Religion. A UN Agenda regarding Religion is unifying all faiths, which goes in direct contact with Ted Turner’s words back in the early 2000s. The UN seeks Peace and Security, and in terms of Religion, it seeks Peace, reasons why religious leaders are being gathered, even to this day, the process to some seems slow, but this action is ongoing and it is rapid, and they have dozens of partners, dozens of sponsors, dozens of donors, etc. Clearly if a DPI NGO saw this coming, mainly the one in question, they would not want to be part of that when the changes were actually taking effect in the world of NGOs. while the Pharisees who needed to listen as well, labeled him as a demon. Then why are you in a position to accuse, even hiding behind Mr. Zelda in order to do so? If someone is labeled as a DPI, why go about labeling them as an ECOSOC? This is what the WT does continually to those who refuse their doctrinal lies. But the Watchtower never had an ECOSOC status when opposers of their faith claims they are. They are labeled “human apostates”, “mentally diseased”, as Jason brought out in the video. That is because anyone who is formerly of the faith, ends up being excommunicated and or expelled, then said person goes about to slander and or disgruntled, hence why the term Apostate can be applied to such ones. Not all former JWs are like the apostates and or even branded as Apostates (For as I said, there are former Jehovah’s Witnesses who do defend current/active Jehovah’s Witnesses, some former Jehovah’s Witnesses who take up and apply life lessons and values they adopted from their former faith, the Jehovah’s Witnesses and current/active Jehovah’s Witnesses know that – even their leaders), hence why, these ExJWs are attacked by disgruntled ExJWs we have an example of this in November as of last year. Moreover, the non disgruntled former JWs actually defend current, active JWs, of which we have many examples of this also, one of which took it upon himself to stop a small army of disgruntled JWs with just a phone call in Orange County Warwick. Moreover, these former Jehovah’s Witnesses themselves at some part end up visiting the main headquarters of the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ community, welcomed even, some still go to church meetings, some still communicate with family members because although they are not pf the faith, they are not Apostates (reasons why when these former JWs defend the faith, disgruntled ones are quick to attack them, and more so, you and disgruntled ExJWs when speaking against and or about your opponent completely ignore these bunch who are in the masses – why is that?) That being said, let’s go for that “mentally diseased” remark. It should already be known to you that the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ leader directed this remark, not to all persons who agree or disagree with them, but rather, this response is directed to apostates. Ironically enough the Bible itself makes mention of such ones as it says below. They based this “mentally diseased” comment on this passage False Teachers and True Contentment 1 Timothy 6:3-5 - [3] If anyone teaches a different doctrine and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching that accords with godliness, [4] he is puffed up with conceit and understands nothing. He has an unhealthy craving for controversy and for quarrels about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, evil suspicions, [5] and constant friction among people who are depraved in mind and deprived of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain. Noticed this [depraved in mind; which also means corrupted minds, diseased about questionings, which also equates to mentally diseased – hence their use of the term; “mentally corrupted” regarding Apostasy is used by some Christians] Jehovah’s Witnesses only pin this term on to the apostates, for this passages technically describes the actions of Apostates, for example, no, the examples of an onslaught from Apostates that continue to bombard them, even to us Christians who do what is necessary to follow the Christ, we deem such ones just as the same in regards to apostasy – and ironically enough, former Jehovah’s Witnesses who are not even deemed an apostate are never identified as this term, more so, these same former JWs even use this term in regards to apostasy on to disgruntled JWs. Therefore, it is hypocrisy to go after them for the use of the term when God’s Word speaks of such people who speak ill of others to the point they are branded as such – you should have known that if you read the First of Timothy. Those verses pretty much describes the attitude some have against these people and their community, it also equates to the fact you have been pinning them with a conspiracy that you yourself cannot even prove as true, and attempted to use Mr. Zelda, a second time, to justify something that you can’t even prove as a truth. I remember that you stated you like Barnes, I suggest you take into account what he has said regarding those depraved in the minds, or as the JWs call it, Mentally Diseased: But doting. Marg., sick. The Greek word-- \~nosew\~ --means properly to be sick; then to languish, to pine after. The meaning here is, that such persons had a sickly or morbid desire for debates of this kind. They had not a sound and healthy state of mind on the subject of religion. They were like a sickly man, who has no desire for solid and healthful food, but for that which will gratify a diseased appetite. They desired no sound doctrine, but controversies about unimportant and unsubstantial matters--things that bore the same relation to important doctrines which the things that a sick man pines after do to substantial food. Source: http://classic.studylight.org/com/bnn/view.cgi?book=1ti&chapter=006 Other Source: https://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/noseo.html https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/depraved https://biblehub.com/1_timothy/6-5.htm nosew in Greek is νοσέω [noseō], the Strong's number is 3552 Orig: from 3554; to be sick, i.e. (by implication, of a diseased appetite) to hanker after (figuratively, to harp upon):--dote. G3554 to be sick [II] metaph. of any ailment of the mind [A] to be taken with such an interest in a thing as amounts to a disease, to have a morbid fondness for Look at the cross-references 2 Corinthians 11:3 - But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ. 2 Timothy 3:8 - Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men corrupted in mind and disqualified regarding the faith. Jude 10 - But these people blaspheme all that they do not understand, and they are destroyed by all that they, like unreasoning animals, understand instinctively. As for the JWs themselves, they even pointed this out That being said, Mr. Zelda, whom you are using once again, did not bring up the fact that they only deem apostates who continue to bother them this term, former JWs who are not on the level of disgruntled ones are not identified as such. In a doctor’s office that my very sick husband visits, the receptionist is JW from another congregation that I was in. But, she knows who I am. He had to step out when paying for the visit so I stepped in to finished the transaction. She couldn’t look me in the eye, keeping her head down; since my name far and wide carries the label, “apostate” Well if you are going to talk ill and or bash someone’s faith, that is Apostasy. It is one thing to speak of biblical heresies and falsehood, it is another stone blocking a tomb of things when it comes to a faith that is not too far off from the early church, more so, you even attest to your own words by calling these people as evil and or having been influence by a demonic spirit. As for that person’s case, him ignoring you is not of his own accord, him ignoring you is due to the Bible’s stance on excommunication and those who are deemed apostates. ”, of the very worst. Maybe because you have shown yourself to not be formerly of the faith and constantly speak of them negatively, even applying conspiracy to your words? Aside from that, you have shown yourself to take up interfaith practices and ideologies as with the teachings of mainstream Christendom practices, doing so out of emotion and feelings when Biblical facts cares not for any of that. Or perhaps you are preaching another doctrine as to, even watering down Jesus Christ’ role as a King, more so, another whereas you used a spurious Bible verse. You can agree with and or disagree with them, but clearly you have been throwing up some red flags, hence why, people make such a response to you. If you did this at CSE, everyone correct you. I thanked her at the end of the transaction but she was so afraid, she couldn’t utter “you’re welcome”, imparting a slight grumble instead. It isn’t about being afraid, it is about not going against what the church of God had practiced for centuries. If Apostle Paul gave example, as with others, not to speak to those who dwell on Apostasy, how is this person afraid and or shameful? If you show yourself to be of Apostasy, acta s such, profess as such and proclaiming ideologies that never originated with the Church, then you are branded as such, as God speaks the same in regards to those who’s minds are deprived. In this sense, they are in the right to do as such. This is so different than how I approached disfellowshipped ones when I was in the organization. You haven’t met all of them because some information I posted from them before, you show yourself to be against. And among them you pull information from the majority of the disgruntled ones, some such as the Fearon followers who were quite nasty to a former Orthodoxy. I wanted to assure them of my love and wasn’t afraid to sit by them during a meeting, making eye contact and smiling at them. So how is it love if you speak of them having a demonic influence and or spirit? Do you know what Love entails in regards to us being in the likeness of God? I wasn’t afraid to speak to them in public and ask how they were. Regardless, if you are seen as an Apostate, there is a reason as to why this is. There is a big difference in a JW who is of the former faith being an apostate or not. They received no other love when visiting the congregation. And would you know if you were excommunicated from the church for a period of time? Just now you were ignorant on the differences of NGOs, be it DPI and or EOCOSC which are technically common in the 1900s to present day, hence the Resolution information. And a reminder, you speak of these people as though they are demonic, and you were easily swayed by conspiracy and yet now you speak of Love. Their faces were deadpan, they were completely ignored when attending meetings. Again, how would you know? For many, the only reason they strive to regain their place in the congregation is because they want to be loved by those whom they thought would loved them until the end. Once again, how would you know? On a personal level, do you know the majority? To the woman in the office, I am her enemy, but it won’t stop me from following Jesus’ teachings as closely as possible, and speaking to as many JWs and anointed “Israel”, as I possibly can. Matt 10:6,23 If that is the case, why did you water down Jesus’ role as king, not knowing what a inspired prophet is compared to a spiritual led one, and if you truly follow Jesus’ teachings, why did you show yourself to be open and accepting of ideologies that never originated with Jesus’ church? In a way, you yourself is a lost sheep. I care not if you are a former JW, what makes me come forth to make a response is the number of times you mix even the Scriptures in your favor, as with the teachings of Jesus’ Church. “You have heard that it was said, Love your neighbor and hate your enemy. 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be children of your Father in heaven. For he causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward will you have? Don’t even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers and sisters, what are you doing out of the ordinary? Don’t even the Gentiles do the same?48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” Matt 5:43-48 No one has persecuted you, in a sense, you are the one persecuting. You are, regarding this topic, insisted the JWs had a role in United Nations plans, since they registration as a DPI NGO in the 1990s, during the years of Agenda 21 slowly growing, you asserted that the JWs had a hand in United Nation affairs, yet you cannot back anything up in this sense, hence why I said it was debunked, granted that only NGOs who are ECOSOC and or equal to that has their hands in the same jar the United Nations’ hands are in. Is it not persecution to call someone in error when they have never even had such a status to remotely enable them to have a hand in the United Nations? The whole OSCE was kind of a weak claim, granted it is known that OSCE has literally no hand in United Nations affairs. Last I checked, OSCE and any who are representatives, either DPI or ECOSOC, in this domain, do not have a role in United Nation affairs, if anything, their concern is in regards to discrimination and or persecution due to one or more of the representatives. As for the JWs, it is not unknown that they too are persecuted, after all – you even posted that document that gives insight on JW persecution in Egypt, and it is known of how Egypt is and who their allies are. That being said, is it not persecution with any and every post – made by you, to the latter group? Some of them whom you do not even know by face and or personally and yet profess claims and or conspiracy to belittle and or defame them? What of it even outside of JWs in your attempt to disrupt the church itself when you speak of things that never originated from it to which you had been corrected in another discussion? “If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. 33 If you do what is good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. 34 And if you lend to those from whom you expect to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners to be repaid in full. 35 But love your enemies, do what is good, and lend, expecting nothing in return. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High. For he is gracious to the ungrateful and evil. 36 Be merciful, just as your Father also is merciful.” Luke 6:32-36 But what love are you showing to anyone if you cannot attest to the truth about NGOs? Why go as far as to go for Mr.Zelda yet again and proclaim his teachings when Zelda himself has no idea the difference between a DPI and ECOSOC, he, Zelda, going as far as to equate the two when the Resolutions say otherwise? Why then, Witness? Is the truth about NGOs this great in which you must be ignorant, willfully, in this sense? I write this to JWs, who know exactly what I'm talking about. Then tell the Jehovah’s Witnesses the difference between a DPI and an ECOSOC. Explain to them, even correct Mr. Zelda on which of these 2 truly support the United Nations in their affairs. Like I said, there is no Agenda of the United Nations the Jehovah’s Witnesses had a hand and or say in that relates to the local/global level of UN based plans. You are an outsider, fully immersed in the activities of the world; so, to you, whatever WT does, appears to be okay; as they cleverly speak out both sides of the mouth. They convince its members they are "no part of the world" by saying, It’s not about being okay, it is about the truth. No one is denying the JWs were a DPI NGO, they are still an NGO regardless of how they see it. The problem is, you using information to confuse the masses that the JWs are an ECOSOC NGO, to which you shed no light on the difference. Only an NGO that is tied to ECOSOC can have a hand in UN affairs, a lone DPI NGO with no criteria met for UN requirements can’t do anything in regards to UN affairs. If you truly knew what you are talking about in regards to NGOs, you’d explain to the JWs what an NGO is and what an NGO must do to quality in terms of requirements for the criteria in order to actually partake and contribute to United Nations affairs. - Stay away from politics. Be neutral. (but, for the org., it's okay to accept gifts from members that includes military stock) They do not have stocks in the military, the information provided by the former JW pretty much destroys your claim, more so, his strong response shows that you do not know what a trust or mutual fund is. That being said, although correct and the truth has been exposed to you, you still dwell on conspiracy. You only show yourself to be befitting of the title – Apostate in the eyes of Jehovah’s Witnesses if you still are willfully accepting conspiracy. You were not able to proof they own stocks when the former JW pointed out information about beneficiaries. Be really honest with yourself. If the information is false, why still act as though it is a truth when it has already been exposed to be a falsehood? Don't smoke, (but its okay for the org. to have stock in cigarette companies if it is a gift) They do not own stocks, you have already been corrected on this, and the facts to face is a former Jehovah’s Witness exposed this truth, of which I professed in our last discussion. Stop attesting to conspiracy otherwise it does not make you ignorant of the truth, it makes you look foolish. But train the JW eye to... You should be more concerned about training yourself. As I have told you before, Witness. You stumbled and have fallen on your knees, scraping and bruising yourself. Examine yourself – stand back up. That being said, Spiritually there is a real battle going on, it is a shame that you are still in some asylumic state regarding JWs and eat from the hands of anyone who professes a conspiracy as truth. - Pay attention to the signs in Satan's world. Look closely at politics and the wars at hand. Examine all activities occurring in Satan's realm and be prepared for disaster. "About the times and the seasons (this is the season of worldly unrest): Brothers and sisters, you do not need anything to be written to you. For you yourselves know very well that the day of the Lord will come just like a thief in the night. When they say, "Peace and security" then sudden destruction will come upon them, like labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape" 1 Thess 5:1-3 Ask yourself if you understand these verses because if you do not know the differences in NGOs, the United Nations Religious Leaders will easily subdue you, and put you on their corner. You can say they won’t take you, but I have seen and heard from many, who end up being swept away, and Washing DC was the biggest example we have with a recent example in 2016. Continue down the path you dwell in Witness, because if you do not examine yourself and understand the Scriptures properly, you will not be God fearing, but rather a fear of something alien, to which leads you to oblivion, resulting in madness taking you forever. And when the Christ returns, he will know who is for his Father, and who isn’t. That being said, the Watchtower was never an ECOSOC, therefore, had no role in UN affairs. They were and always will be known as a DPI NGO who didn’t even pass the test to be accepted into the charter.

The mistake many by a lot of people. Mainly those who attempt to fight back with 0% chance of winning the confrontation. At that point it is a one way ticket to sleeping in Sheol, only to way up some unknown years later during the Resurrection and say to yourself. "Wow! I really messed up that time" That being said, one has to be thinking, clearly and quickly, and not be lollygagging.

But even those who live in such conditions can deal with aggressors without the means of violence. Not always a scream and or loud shouts can prevent an attack. In most cases it only encourages the attacker to continue, should the aggressor intent is to inflict harm out of hate, to rob, to rape, to send a message, in regards to gangs, affiliation should a kill is needed, thus people whoa re unaware ends up making themselves a target, otherwise they are just targeted. In terms of what @Equivocation had said, you can defend yourself by blocking, and or preventing a blow from coming your way, therefore, self-defense in this sense can be used, grappling and or subduing. Self-Defense in regarding to striking a deadly blow and or to cripple is something you would not be doing at all, more so, you having the intent do commit heavy injury, even kill, it only put blood on your hands, mainly when you give in to some form of emotion in the moment and adrenaline rush. In you want my experience, most aggressors will not go after people who are seen as intimidating, hence why I do not have this problem, however to someone who is not in my position, the aggressor would try to go after them, even if the person and or victim is unaware of ignorant of his or her surroundings. Vengeance is not in your hands, it is in God's hands, for God is a God of Justice. However you can defend yourself without inflict harm, injury and or death to the aggressor. This attest to the practice of combat in terms of sharp vigilance, being aware of your surroundings, the people around you, who you are near and or with, and so forth, and the focus, as picked up from the examples is in regards to being in places whereas there are people around, although most people tend to suffer the Bystander Effect, but there will be some, if in some cases, who will take action in your behalf should you be in trouble. This allows you to call the police and or seek help and or go to a safe place. Active Self Protection promotes to get out of the danger zone and always be compliant. You need an attitude, you need the skills and a plan. You cannot build a house without a plan and the skills to do it, likewise, when it comes to your safety. Pretty much the point that was discus. You can defend yourself, even having the know how to self defense without inflicting harm to someone, should they attempt to harm you, with self defense skills you can block, you can kick and so forth. However, you will also have provokers, who will attempt to get you to fight, having the right attitude you can spot this to evade problems because this type of aggressor wants to get something out of you - a show, in order to slander you. They only tell their members they cannot inflict pain, harm, injury and or death. They can defense themselves without commit to any form of violence. In fact, there are those who in this domain who teaches this time of self-defense. Now in an example, @Equivocation is a teenager, you are an adult, and let's add Rook in this for the fun of learning, which of the two are you are most likely to be targeted? Another question I would pose the both of you is if you were both in a situation, let's say a Gas Station in Florida, a conflict rose up on one side of the Gas Station and a guy pulls out a crowbar and threatens to swing it at another man, the other guy pulls out a gun whereas you guys are nearby.What would be your attitude? Your Skill? And your Plan? Among all 3 that unifies all of them, what is the most important thing that one must do? Obvious screaming and shouting in this scenario will only make you a victim in this semi-public place.... And it's Florida. Off the bat, one thing I will tell you about Knife Attacks is that it is very, very, VERY HIGH in the United Kingdom, such as London, and Knife Attacks are very common. The same can be said for Asian countries. It is not as common in Russia however there was one knife attack, one of which I had seen whereas a lone woman was stab over and over and over again even though she had died - in a case like this the killer knew the person and how these attacks are fashioned, such things is evident. An Aggressor with a Knife will draw you in, with gripping the knife in his or her other hand whereas someone with a guy will push you away with his or her free arm vs. the knife wielder. Most of the time knife attacks will happen should the aggressor want to rob you, it is a different story if it is racism and or hating one's religion, examples would be Muslim woman for example in the UK, be it adult and or teen, knife wielders have not just their religion, but their race and or background and will spare no second in an attack, even while in a public place because they know they can commit the action before anyone reacts. That being said, it all comes down to knowing things. Such as a disarm, you can disarm a knife from someone by means of wrestling it out of a person's hands without commit harm and or injury, and if you are that skilled, you can do the same with a gun. But compliance in most cases is key, other items you will need a plan or two, a couple, in place. Self-Defense without commit harm, injury and or killing. And you are right, you should not take the life of and or seriously arm the aggressor.

One thing for certain, those who gain access to the dark web do so by means where their ISP cannot track them. Some tech savvy tech users, video gamers, even some hackers who are well aware of this can get access to such, however, some of them tend not to dwell too far off on the not so happy part of the internet.

@BillyTheKid46 Agenda 21 is in regards to the 21st Century and it entails the worldwide United Nations program for sustainable development that is put in a a local based level, something of which we see today that is taking place, with the idea of global thinking while at a local level (think globally, act locally). The other one, Agenda 2030, similar to Agenda 21, however, it entails the worldwide United Nations program for sustainable development that is put in a nation state level. Both of them are progressing right now at the same time, more so, in the United Sates right now, so far we are only seeing Agenda 21 at play here. Some would say that the Agenda 2030 of the UN will ruin Western Civilization. A population easy to control, easy to manipulate, easily move the people into smaller homes, to be monitored watched, smart homes as some would say, hence why since the aftermath of California, people are watching what is going on and what will happen, we already got smart devices that can hear us say something and do things as we command, like a butler and or some genie in a bottle type of nonsense, in a degree, our lives being intertwined with such technology in which the government can use to easily take the people without notice. As for Education, Money, Religion, Government, all of this equates to the Global Mafia, and or the Establishment who seeks to unify all these things - hence the term New World Order, to which Truthers refer to such as a totalitarian Orwellian Future (pretty much what can be read from the book called 1984 by George Orwell). The powers that be are doing what is necessary to keep true to their goals and agendas. Those who are unaware are usually the ones that are easily swept away, engulfed by the words coming from the Establishment, in this sense, brainwashing. As for the year, you referring to the population increases/decreases? I would not say there is a difference, more like binding it's time, continuing to grow in power and resources so when they have to unleash all that stored up power, they would want to make sure that it's effect can be felt. Another thing is those who marry and have children with those of a selected group who are of this fold, so the children can grow up in this circle and when they grow up and are capable of having children, their children would also repeat the cycle. As for population control, that is a large chunk of the pie of it's own, however, this is also included, as is within making a shift and or change to a populace, such as immigration in the US and other parts of the world such as the EU.

I do not recall the Old Law simply focusing on women alone when it comes to blasphemy. Regarding blasphemy in the face of God punishment in this regard applies to a man and or a woman, not a single sex alone. As for the last statement, a bit hypocritical much, granted women in the Bible, even you gave praise to two women before, despite you mistaking one for a man.

I sent you a link regarding every known NGO in Africa, for as I made it clear to the ignorance of the one in question, this one still needs to see what is going on. The list contains Name NGO Status Sponsors Area of Focus An example: The list was listed for me by a close friend of mine who has also been looking into things regarding the UN, although he has been in this longer than me since he had more years ahead of him than me. I will post, if need be the Migration information also, but that will be for another thread of which focuses on such things. Other than that I mentioned the International Bar Association. In short, you have every reason to condemn the United Nations just as is said by your religious leader of your faith - as is what others have said regarding the UN, be it religious and or non-religious, and the whole DPI thing should not be of any problem for you, in a what if scenario, if it was ECOSOC, than that, would be an even bigger and yet different story present day, but that is not the case.

Or in simple terms - Dense minded. Orange Man Bad. All jokes aside, regarding OSCE, it is in relation to religious human rights, no under the table world domination craziness that the global mafia is doing. Anyone can become a an NGO, to our JW counterparts here, their history as an NGO is as visible as the grey hairs we end up getting on our faces and hair (I have never reached that point yet). However they wanted access to resources in 1991 and were told they had to become an NGO to gain said resources, to which they did and they became an NGO with a DPI status in 1992. Any NGO that has a say in UN decisions and affairs are the latter, ECOSOC status. So for instance, you apply for as an NGO in the early 1990s, quick run through of paperwork and you are good to go, and you needed an NGO status to gain resources to let's say, usage of vegetation flora and any statistics in relation to vegetation and flora, now if it was the other status, you'd be the errand boy of the United Nations, technically signing yourself over to them and in this scenario, you can be just an ECOSOC and or both ECOSOC and DPI, and with this status, and being an errand boy, you are able to support and gain support of the UN and even gain ECOSOC affiliated sponsors, partnerships, and a list of other things, and the dark thing about it, you would not know what ungodly thing the UN wants to do regarding vegetation and flora. Perhaps halve the food supply or something to force a shift and or change a a group of people or something. Not the best example, but I am trying to be brief right now and quick.

And yet you find it fitting to accuse those who, as some claim to take part in things such as agenda 21 and a list of other things? Reasons why when it comes to such things, the term befits you well because this isn't the first time I had stated this to you. I am willing and able to share, as is with the history of things in regqards to the World of NGOs, and as an added benefit, for others to see. And yet you haven't read the final portions of the very pdf you linked regarding religious human rights? This is the same article I brought up to so and so here in regards to Religious Rights - ironic I see it here again and like before, key points have been ignored by you, likewise, with the very person I linked this information to months ago here. @Equivocation For starters, the video Witness linked this same man confused his audience on trust fund information, and in order to sway the masses on his side. A former JW who has dwelled in trust fund and financial information, of which I posted before, thoroughly exposed Mr. Zelda by bringing forth truth to claim on what a trust fund actually is, as can be read here so it will give you some enlightenment of who Mr. Zelda is and how one-sided it tends to be - even going as far as people bringing this up to him via comment only to be ignored. What Mr. Zelda did not touch base further on in this regards is that not only the Jehovah's Witnesses/The Watchtower was an NGO (registered without signature in the 1991 after being informed to gain access to library resources, having registered as a DPI NGO in 1992) with a DPI status only, let alone go into detail of the DPI NGO documents regarding any one registering as an DPI NGO. A DPI means Department of Public Information. There is also another meaning regarding other things, UNDPI which stands for United Nations Department of Public Information. It is a department of the Secretariat of the United Nations that is tasked with raising public awareness and support of the work of the United Nations through strategic communications campaigns, media and relationships with civil society groups, as it stands today, the information on this matter can be found on their own website: http://www.un.org/en/sections/departments/department-public-information/index.html In the United Nations' system, there are NGOs who are associated with ECOSOC which stands for and or means Economic and Social Council, and there are NGOs affiliated with, as already mentioned, the DPI, again, meaning Department of Public Information (DPI). In the history of the Jehovah's Witnesses affiliation with being an NGO, to which they were verified as to registering without a signature, for in the early 1990s, no signature was ever require in those days for the form that they used, for such was a simply fill in what is being asked of you. Furthermore, most people, even those who buy into conspiracy tend to quote and confuse what a DPI is to an ECOSOC, vice versa confuse the two when in reality, both of such are different - ECOSOC I will go over shortly in my other response. To be brief and simple - They do not know the difference in NGOs affiliated with DPI status and a ECOSOC status, which is [this status] in fact quite common with NGOs nowadays. This is an example of how such forms, well in template form, looks like nowadays, and in other cases, it mirrors as such electronically: https://outreach.un.org/sites/outreach.un.org/files/ngorelations_legacy/2016/10/Instructions.pdf The other ones can easily be googled by both for you and those whoa re against you, however only one side sees the difference while the other equates both statuses as the same. The opponents of your faith will bear claim that an outline from the letter shows that the Watchtower was an associated NGO (they haven't touched based on the DPI status) and to become associated required the Watchtower to accept the following as read below I also advise you to take the time to look at this http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/13/ares13.htm Religious Rights and practice of religion, Witness? I have already touched base on this a number of times here, as is with others who have been defending the Bible, beaten for it, some even having to confront Satanist in public places and cemeteries. Even your own links show us clearly that the right to practice their faith and religious practices was under fire and what tactic was used by Egypt to remove their, in this sense, competition, which is a similar case with Christians who were formerly Coptic in Egypt, but these were not JWs and since they were not, they get threats instead, and how are you so sure they didn’t communicate with God regarding actions taken to prevent the cease of worship? It did not stop our church fathers or anyone in connection to the disciples in ancient times who were on the same boat, now did it? Mainly when it came to real Christian teachings that were under fire. Surely if I came to you and tried to nullified, even destroy your right to worship, you’d be on the defense as well, granted of how grave things can turn out in the long run. That being said, regarding JWs and their issues in Egypt, the man in this image, on the far right side is named Pope Tawadros II, the leader of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria. He had a role to play in the banning of Jehovah's Witnesses, which includes the claim of them being Zionist in Egypt. The Article you linked has given key points on this matter, it is no surprise that you haven't not read it from start to finish. The article you provided points out that Beginning in the mid-1950’s, a defamatory campaign was launched against Jehovah’s Witnesses, accusing them of being Zionists. The sources show that these accusations came from some ecclesiastical authorities who claimed that as many as 5,000 Zionists under the cover of the name Jehovah’s Witnesses represented a threat to State security. Those accusations were false. Egyptian Witnesses were then a very small group and absolutely not Zionists. Onward, Tawadros himself was in on this and clearly does not like JWs, not only calling them a Sect, he also refers to them as Zionist, again, defamatory, and a false accusation. http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/101035/Egypt/Politics-/Pope-Tawadros-II-Jehovahs-Witnesses-is-unchristian.aspx https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pope-tawadros-ii-jehovahs-witnesses-unchristian-illegal-sect-092046732.html?guccounter=1 Yet Tawadros is a hypocrite because he affiliates himself with those in support of Zionism in the conquest for peace, examples like Pope Francis on the far left, who around the time was swaying religious leaders to side with him. https://www.timesofisrael.com/meeting-zionist-union-chair-pope-vows-to-help-bring-hamas-held-captives-home/ And your point? We were all not born yesterday. The Jehovah's Witnesses are not perfect persons, either am I, you, Rook and everyone else here as is the world. The imperfections of sin is in men, and such men can go into schools, churches, and other institutions, even clubs and sports and their taint effects people, especially those that are ill-equipped to handle such matters. God our Father helps those who are for him, I do not see how something as such is what irks you. Correction. The timeline of the ban it began with an NGO who in connection with Aleksander Dvorkin has a hand in this, granted Aleksander Dvorkin was not favor JWs and sees them as a Sect whereas his following has complained about JWs, yet they never touched the elusive man who claims he is the Christ - Vissarion. Dvorkin's connection aligns with Putin's Kremlin and the Russian Orthodox Church to label non-Orthodox religions in Russia as extremist groups and eliminate them, this also goes for anyone caught in the cross-fires. The RoC however, was well aware of who the JWs are and does not like them, as well as see them as competition, hence why as soon as the JWs finally got banned, for a time the RoC sent out their own to take their place and they did so with forces, which isn't to far away from who they treated Russian citizens in the past, be it man or woman. For no mercy is shown to anyone whom the Kremlin and or church has called extremist or a Navanly Hero or the fact that so and so's action is against Russia when it is not, this goes for a Librarian, this goes for a gamer, this goes for a little boy who quotes Shakespeare, all of which ends up reaping consequence. That being said, if you think the Kremlin, the Duma, and the RoC has done justify, then it not only makes you ignorant of what was going on all this time in Russia, to some degree it makes you heartless for all of these Russians as a whole were the punching bag of this triad. There has been Russian Christians who were not of the RoC who tried to help JWs, some of them were in fear because websites like this they were afraid of ending up on, to which, since prior to the ban to now, 777 Crew and many others won a nice victory over by taking down that website, but the main ones regarding religion that the FSB has is still unknown. According to the 777 Crew, non-Orthodox Christians and several others, JWs are underground now but are continually hunted by the FSB and Kremlin, tampered JW material had been used to discredit them, more so, even in the Russian Schools, professors targeted JW students because said students were not of and or did not partake in the glorification of war, the event known as the Moscow Victory Day Parade in Russia. The irony before all this took place, prior to the French NGO, prior to the historic meeting between Cyrill and the Pope, Cyrill went to the south of the earth and has been said to have drawn spiritual energy from the earth itself or from some source, and as soon as he got back, before the Russian elections and the protesting, they had been targeting JWs at full force by means of twisting the Yarovaya law (Закон Яровой), even some Russians pointed this out months before. Those who are with the 777 Crew and FREU are on the side of freedom, and are not fans of what the Russians have done to the JWs, as a result nor any non-Orthodox wish that on their own worse enemy because the ban has affected them also, you have people being arrested in the thousands (1,600+), you have the Bible being prohibited in Russia, you have the Duma making laws, some of them being of the most extreme, one in particular being broadcasting information. Like I said, there is a large amount of Christians even going as far as to defending JWs because they also see that what is being done isn’t right, and people being kicked out of their homes by means of demolish projects; and for a brief amount of time, the RoC has taken the place of JWs by going door to door to halt people by force. All the while why Russian Media has been slandering JWs left and right to provoke people. So you tell me Witness, do JWs roll on the ground and slap each other on the backside with sticks, as proclaimed by the Russian media, Russian controlled media in fact? Do they heal people by using their hands, as mentioned by Russian media? This is a strong example of how the MSM and the Triads of Power sees them, I had posted before the recent 2017 ones and I will gladly post them if need be. Should they been targeted day in and day out even when they are not practicing their faith, for even recreational activities lands them in jail? As the Russians have stated, a dark time will come over Russia. And you clearly have no idea of the very time-frame of the ban itself, not realizing various events taking place prior, therefore, your ignorance befits you well. All in all, the pieces of the puzzle falls with Aleksander Dvorkin, and you not knowing him, only proves to me you know very little of all that came to pass in Russia up until Putin's election and his victory. Again. You do not know the course taken by the RoC, the Duma and the Kremlin and the chaos that was going on 2017 to early 2018 in Russia. No one could win against the Kremlin nor stop them from taking up a victory in the election. Granted with what happen to that JW student, another reasons for the ban was that JW's neutrality poses as a threat to the Russian election, and makes them an even bigger target due to proclaiming said neutrality. And it was not a surprise to them either because of the history itself in that country. This is excluding people vanishing off the streets in Chechnya. God knows who is form him hence why he has not abandon anyone. I also know those of my sources who are Russian and live there, know for a fact what entails of what it means to be Christian, after all, they were formerly RoC until a certain band, which I rather not name here, did something that was uncalled for that opened a can of beans. There is still a good junk of JWs in Russia, according to them, and they still continue their faith as the looming dark days of Russia is slowly approaching. On the contrary, they have not just now made this claim. This has been stated by them for quite some time, perhaps for a long while now. In fact, they are not the only ones who believe Russia to be the King of the North, granted with what we are seeing today in the End Times and people believe things regarding the modern day Kingdoms. People like Ewiak Ryszard and Hal Lindsey, Christians Scholars made that same claim about Russia being the King of the North – as is with others (granted with everything that took place after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union), it is not only the JWs who have said that. Moreover, if you knew Russia’s allies, what they can and will do as time processes and their affairs in parts of the world you would not even know they were in, people will come to that conclusion. Russia is the direct opposite of the US, and their allies. When there is an establishment of power who seeks more power, there will always be another faction who is not on the same said as this establishment, but does their own ill deeds in contrast to the latter, who is doing ill deeds of their own. Actually - no. Because the groups mention, and the non-Orthodoxy ones and others have brought to claim of what JWs are actually doing in Russia as we speak. Despite their ban, they are still practicing their faith, as they put it, in critical times hard to deal with. If you dwell on all things Russia and have sources there, you'd realize that. More so, you be well aware of all the events that took place in Russia but the fact you make no mention to that and the key things that led to the ban and a list of other things, proves ignorance. Reasons why I an relate to the 777 Crew, whereas one of them has stated Westerners do not know what they are dealing with, for in their case, they have been affected by the State Duma once those 2017 laws kicked in that effected their broadcasting outside of Russia. Totally unrelated to what has been going on and how things are now and onward if you fail to realize events that took place in Russia. Majority of Christendom has been watching Russia since early 2016 - we were right. They haven’t been decreasing according to Christian adherent statics, they have been going up, as I had mention this time and time again. Only Mainstream, Christianity has been declining whereas minorities are untouched, evidence of this in regards to everything in regards to mid-2015 and onward whereas there has been more talk in the Trinity vs. Anti-Trinity space. Therefore, there is no evidence of a huge decline regarding them. It isn't another example, it merely pertains to the previous link. It states: Only registered representatives of participating States, Partners for Co-operation, OSCE Institutions, NGOs, think tanks or others can submit documents to the ODIHR Documents Distribution System for distribution during the Human Dimension Implementation Meeting. ODIHR bears no responsibility for the content of such documents received for distribution, and circulates them without altering their content. The distribution by the ODIHR Documents Distribution System of documents received does not imply any endorsement by ODIHR and is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. DPI NGO have representatives and they are able to send those who represent them to OSCE meetings. And regarding their history, it is in regards to Religious Rights, the freedom to practice faith and to profess it in the face of religious persecution and or discrimination. To quote myself because I did speak on this before: My older quote which is in relation to OSCE, as is due to my nature of typing fast back then there is typos, and I know how much you love my typos. From Jehovah's standpoint, is it alright for a worshiper of his to attend conferences of a worldly political organization, such as the OSCE, and address its delegates? Regarding Eusebius (Well known Church Father, best imho), who is highly regarded by many as "The Father of Church History," and who attended the Council of Nicaea in the year 325 C.E., convened by Roman Emperor Constantine, a A Watchtower article (2003, 7/15 , pg. 29-31) states the following: The article, quoting from James 4:4, rightly notes that the friendship with the world is enmity with God, and if this applied to Eusebius back in 325 C.E. then it certainly applies also to Christians today, including the Jehovah's Witnesses. As the scripture goes on to tell us, "Whoever, therefore, wants to be a friend of the world is constituting himself an enemy of God." There is good reason why God has told his people not to put their trust 100% in the nobles among them, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs." - Psalms 146:3-5; compare to Jeremiah 17:5-8, 13. The leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses know full well that one cannot be partaking of the table of God and the table of demons, without inciting Jehovah to jealousy -1 Corinthians. 10:20-22. We personally do not know or aware of the things being done behind closed doors by the ones we look at to as our leaders, but we do know that everything is seen and heard by God, him with whom we have an accounting. Examples of this is Moses Sister Miriam and Aaron, even though Moses wasn't with them as they spoke, but God knows, God's eyes is on all who walk the earth, on the creatures that roam the lands and in the sea, in addition, this reflects Isaiah's prophecy rings for God's people today based on Isaiah 9:15-17. Information on the Reformation: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41817418 Note: I will not go into detail of what it signifies, but this has caused mass concern for those within Christianity, well those who hasn't submitted themselves to side with the world religious leaders whereas for it's intentions and goals with aid from the UN. This event has put most Christians and Jehovah's Witnesses to have a common opponent, even some who are neutral with JWs share this common enemy. What can be said is the Reformation is something that is not a good thing, to the world leaders and religious leaders of false teachings, yes, but never to those who know the bible, those who know God and Jesus, they won't fall to tactics like that so easily. As for World Leaders, they are all join together, thanks to the UN, they were able to start their conquest for Peace. Be careful of whom you cast your stones at. Source: http://perimeno.ca/Letters_1107_OSCE.htm And that is exactly? You were not very knowing of Russia, or the situation in Egypt, or perhaps Religious Rights and so forth. And you let Mr. Zelda get to you once again regarding NGO status. There is a saying for that, Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Then what is stopping you from proving that they have a status of ECOSOC whereas it enables any NGO to actually contribute to the plans, ideals and decision making of the United Nations? Why isn't the Watchtower Interfaith if they are but of the One World Religion of the United Nations as with ALL Religious NGOs who are with the UN past, present and onward? Any information as to how and why the JWs are somehow contributors of Agenda 21? You can prove deception if you answer at least the very first one, otherwise you are casting stones into an empty sky, Witness. Really? Was this the same power you had when you professed God sent Satan to do his bidding? Open your eyes Witness. Even Beasts in the field is able to tell when the sun is up and when it is down, we should be aware in this sense as they are, and be realistic. You do not have to agree with the Watchtower or the Jehovah's Witnesses at all, but to continue dwelling on conspiracy time and time again, you did not even utter a word of NGO status, and you expect people to fall in line with you? At least be open to mistakes, something of which I am capable of doing, in your case, you own up to error and continue to walk in circles time and time again. I recall telling you, strongly, you keep on stumbling upon yourself, and here we see you have. Be honest with yourself. Should your ability tow worship, pray and obverse, read and the like is in danger of ceasing, what would you do? Know this, there will be those who crack under pressure of persecution, strong persecution, and surely in my experience, despite this odds I still continue, I still maintain because my faith is my food, my water, and my sweat, in this sense, should you walk my shoes it would be burdensome for you, likewise, there are Christians out there who, like me, have suffered to only press forward. That being said, stand up, and this will be the last time I will confront you on conspiracy because the next time, it will very direct. As pertaining to the United Nations I will simply put it in this quote, whatever needs to be changed by me I will do it another time because I have also been working on a response for the other person, @Equivocation: As for the topic at hand, they have every right to condemn the United Nations, as is all persons who know the Agenda that is in the process.

I assume then that you have the research?Some of the claims have been brought up before regarding OSCE and the claims of the faith community being in total subjection to UN agendas and affairs, even going as far as some making claims that the faith community in question has some crazy thing to gain out of the UN, as is their other counterparts who have long since sold themselves by upping their status and affiliation. Because it is. An NGO, all who register can take up a DPI status, mainly if it is to gain access to something and or some resource, moreover, DPI NGOs are suppose to have representatives to represent said NGO in some instances, i.e. OSCE whereas in this case, the whole OSCE isn't some meet up for pushing the UN agenda, in religious cases, it is in regards to religious rights if a faith and or community is a target of persecution and or anti-semitic and or discriminative situations. An NGO can have a role and or say in United Nation affairs, even decision making of things if they have an affiliation other than a DPI, sometimes, some NGOs have both. An example would be ECOSOC whereas that status lands you in the spotlight of the United Nations whereas your actions actually means something. Most NGOs with this status tends to take up human rights work and so forth sponsored ECOSOC NGOs tend to also have partnerships, as well as extensive programs that increases their efforts and or actions which correlates to United Nations goals and or agendas. Everyone has attempted and such ones and there are some out there with legitimate information should they dwell on the world of NGOs and their history, mainly with the changes that took place in the 90s and onward. That being said, I find it hard to believe people can be one-sided and also believe that you community is for and supportive at the time for an agenda that those knowing of what it entails has a disdain for. I have, and I mention bits of it before regarding NGO status, and have talked about OSCE before, but as always, such things are usually brought up mid-discussion.

@Srecko Sostar So then regarding what yous said Are you willing to kill/inflict harm on to someone regarding an event or no? Regardless of the answer - as a Christian? Not a lot of us have such problems, let alone have the need to even consider such, in my case, I am already as intimidating as it is, but am a nice guy, other times, as mention before, I was compared to a WWE wrestler and a NFL player a few times, for in the US, people tend to not mess with you depending on appearance most of the time, sometimes be it of race or background as well. I have met with Christians who are not following the Bible all the way and are willing and ready to kill people with a firearm, a rifle and or other that puts you in Sheol before you can spell "God". One example is regarding what took place on a college some weeks ago regarding atheist, and to quote one Christian he says Deus Vult (meaning God Wills) these guys have been ruining Christianity for the longest time, they deserve death and should be killed on sight. Other commentor: Dude chill your corn rolls, Christians should not be in such position to say such things. The Bible says do not murder [or kill] [the two went back and forth about the word "kill" and bible strongs and the first guy sees the other guy as not a true Christian] You are not a True Christian, you Protestant scum, a Christian is not by word, but of action Other Commentor: Is it 420 already? I'm not a Protestant you idiot, you got prove to back that up? Regardless of what you say, we as Christians SHOULD NOT BE DOING THESE THINGS OR WISHING DEATH ON ANY MAN. These atheist should die or be killed, regardless if they are a man, a woman even a child Other commentor: You are crazy, God does not want us to be killers, we are under a new covenant. Let this sink in, demon, Jesus stopped his disciple from attacking someone with a sword, although he manage to cut his ear, take in the lesson of what Jesus said. [Onward from this discussion other Christians hopped in to expose this guy] I am paraphrasing from memory, but this discussion was a big one, it took place under an RT News video regarding religion some weeks ago. Clearly not a lot of Christians are for taking someone's life, mainly if you have not done it before, and there are those justifying the old law to partake in the killing when Jesus abolished such and clearly arguments like this will take place. You can defend yourself, but you cannot and should not kill, and as in defense, you should be able to defend without inflicting bodily harm because that is wrong and such can and will be used against you to make you appear as the villain, the bad guy. So if someone provokes you and you harm them, they will make a case that Srecko Sostar has hit them, should it be a woman who has provoked you, you will be, especially in America, in a world of hurt because she can claim physical and or sexual violence when in reality she was the aggressor who has provoked you. That being said, what is wrong with Prophet Isaiah? You do realize some of what he said is still intact regarding even Bible Principles, right? Or should we cherry pick and pretend what has been said to not have some sort of importance? Also violence begets more violence. Defending oneself in ignorance can and will put you and or your family, friends, even a bystander at risk where they end up injured and or dead themselves, most of these cases take place around the world, one of the common places are areas like Brazil. An example, taking action on someone may result in that person following you to your home, to your job, seeking you out and will spare no mercy or pity to anyone else hurt in the pursuit.

@James Thomas Rook Jr. But now you have to deal with the laws of the land in this sense regarding child abuse and reporting such, and the fact that some people tend to not get involved with such because it can put them at risk themselves and or their household. That being said, I have cut all electronic use for 2-3 weeks now and had gone off-grid, so to speak. I do not recall making a thread on this matter, but making a response to someone, even mentioning 2 videos of girls escaping their captors. Odd, true, but I guess information like this has to be reviewed thoroughly by others.

He's referring to something, a joke that derives from the Otaku Community (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otaku), to which most opponents of JWs refer to it as Bethel Pillows. NOTE: In the Otaku Community and it's Culture, a dakimakura (抱き枕) (from daki (抱き) "to embrace or cling" and makura (枕) "pillow"), is a type of large pillow from Japan. The word is often translated in English as a "body pillow". In Japan, dakimakura are similar to Western orthopedic body pillows, and are 'commonly' used by Japanese youth as "security objects". NOTE: During the 1990s, dakimakura began to intertwine with Otaku Culture, leading to the production of pillow covers featuring printed images of bishōjo and bishonen in laying poses from various anime or bishōjo games. Many of these early otaku dakimakura covers were released through Cospa, a character goods and apparel store which continues to release official dakimakura covers to this day. Although sometimes called a "Dutch wife", the original definition of this phrase is closer to the chikufujin, or "bamboo wife". 2015 saw some of the first talking body pillows with Ita-Supo and its mascot, Rina Makuraba. It was invented by former Kyushu Institute of Technology researcher, Koichi Uchimura. Examples: Legitimate Christian Communities who fight against porn and masturbation consider such jokes as an offense and they are offended by this. Reasons why when in another discussion, I copy/paste the comments of some people here who joked about this in which such persons had been, so to speak, grilled, by the Christian Community, some comments I rather not quote because the whole pillow joke thing was highly offensive. I rather not say the names of whom in question on this forum. In my case, having experience, speaking to children and teens about this matter, having a brother who had several years battling porn and masturbation hence being victim to it, even having a friend who was at the door step of the Adult Industry, ended up taking her own life in feeling guilty - such things I do not consider it as a joke as most people do. True Christians, in this matter, do not joke about these things, those that do, needs to self evaluate themselves and re-read some passages and parables in the Bible. That being said, I do not see why people tend to joke about a legitimate problem, not having a or lacking in a concern of helping such persons, but that is what separates a real Christian from a pretender, or a provocateur. But yes, Otaku Culture and it's community has a strong love for anime, some to the point they will take any sex appeal-sque character from said anime and put it on to a Body Pillow, in some cases, will lead to acts of viewing of pornography of said character, which is flooded all over the internet (reasons why parents need to filter their internet, mainly when there is brazen images of even young characters from said shows/anime produced) as with the urge of masturbation, which is common to single souls of that community. It is not too far off from the Bronies and the Furries. Otaku Culture is very strong in the US and the EU. Some of these guys who have gone to far are often made fun of, however what the people do not realize those in that community tend to cope because of depression and often stumble on to brazen acts, hence why good souls need to help such ones, to reason with them and so forth - one of the things I am for regarding helping these guys.

@Arauna Indeed. Guess where those (a few among many) affected by the fires in California will soon be going? Smart Homes. The UN agenda seems like a joke to some, we are even called crazy, but in the end they do not realize how grave these agendas from the UN actually is. We already have NGOs doing some of the most absurd in the EU regarding migrants. The people are gullible just as they were in Washington and Texas and elsewhere regarding the role the UN has regarding religion, just as they were when the UN also has their hands in the education system and how they are grooming out children, even in colleges and universities with utter subtly. The one world movement of such ones will harm the people greatly and it falls in line with an Orwellian Future as read in the 1984 book.

Vous pouvez dire aux gens encore et encore et ils ne veulent pas écouter. Ironiquement, avec le temps, les gens ont tendance à remarquer leurs propres erreurs à cet égard et à apporter des corrections positives.

@Kosonen Always prepared. Also next time, be very careful of posting information from the MSM, mainly when it comes to France for the MSM has been spreading misinformation about the Yellow Jackets, they speak of them in a bad light, not realizing that there are truthers out there who exposed their false information about what is going on in France. Moreover, the Yellow Jacket Movement has been spreading to areas outside of Paris, outside of France, furthermore, there are more Nationalist going into the group as with others who have ill intent, resulting in the original movement to look bad in the eyes of the MSM to exploit it.