Space Merchant

In thee end, the Devil has gambled for the last time, and like his demons, he will ultimately be wiped off from the plain of existence by means of everlasting destruction.

@Kosonen Unfortunately, it isn't only the JWs who believe the King of the North to be the latter. There is a lot of people who, in this regard, who say the same thing the WT is saying. I believe I either posted this information to someone here before a long time ago. Plus it should be evident in terms of who is with and sides with the US, vice versa for Russia, the secondaries, and those who play for both sides - this I posted also.

I do not see why people take issue to a young one being baptized. As long as the young one has learnt about God, understand Scripture and a list of other things, he or she can be baptized should they seek it. This goes hand in hand with everything pertaining to the origin of baptism as a whole, and what John did in regards to what it represented other than forgiveness of sin, etc. There is a historical factor played into all of this.

@Shiwiii @JOHN BUTLER Poor choice of words. That, my ignorance friend, is race mocking. Psalm 1:1 - Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; Proverbs 15:12 - A scoffer does not like to be reproved; he will not go to the wise. That being said, what the boy says is indeed true, but you wouldn't not have known that because of the sheer ignorance of the situation that is and has taken place in the West. In the examples below, it shows how people are and can become violent for the political theater going on in the US as we speak, the situation the boy mention was not him being, quote on quote "racist", in fact, this situation actually took place, therefore, your claim is at a level of idiocy and ignorance. These are not PG, letting you know this now. Hate is what imperfect men embrace, and we can see it in full display in men, in women, and even children who haven't even hit their teens yet. NOTE: Regarding the students, there were people, grown people, calling for the death and killing of these teenagers. Lastly, surely you are better than that, Mr. Butler... The boy made no mention of the Hood, yet your comment shows one of your true colors on this platform for all to bear witness to, and it shows you are in total subjection to misconceptions which can easily be refuted by even that of a child. The next time you do such mockery to anyone, man, woman or child, an engrave portrait of what you have uttered will be in full display. Other than that, what you professed before the closing of 2018, I saw no information, so it is a lack of care from you, or abandon. As for his claim about one being inferior, he was referring to what you said of me (mind you, you didn't even mention me, so I had looked at my name), hence the response I had, strongly, given you. One does not feel inferior because of his or her color and or race, Mr. Butler, and at the time, that remark from you was out of the blue. And I find it very odd you are now doing this, in conjunction with making a mockery of those who live somewhere, playing into the misconceptions and the like. A shame on you and woe to you too. @Equivocation We are living in an age where people do not want to here a word from the Bible. They paint God as something else. It is no surprise that people of this nature will react to what the Bible really says and those who will threaten you to attack you. Fear no man, but rather, be God fearing, always, and know what you are doing is what Jesus has been doing, for the message has been passed on, it is up to the individual to make that change. That being said, I had run into folks who used the Bible to defend Polygamy, Pedophilia, Homosexuality, using weapons to murder (some want to kill atheists, be it man woman or child) and a list of other things, some believe only black people are of God and everyone is an Edomite or a child of Esau, but they are hypocrites who carry a Bible that was crafted by an Englishmen and fail to realize that God is impartial, and the list goes on. During my time out, I had been preaching the Word and did so in the birthplaces of my family, and when I came back, I had to deal with those who saw God as Molech, which is NOT okay with me, so the truth had been spoken.

@Equivocation @Srecko Sostar @James Thomas Rook Jr. And since December, not a word from the 3 of you about this sole word when it comes to the realm of self defense and the like. I will say it here for you since this answer will not cometh from either of you: Compliance. It is an action commit by those when they are in such a situation, mainly in the example I professed. It is not the best one, but in terms of self defense, it is a second nature type of tactic unknowingly or unknowing committed depending on the situation and or events that lead up to such things. And child, when and how did this happen? In my head, I am thinking of when the car starts to smoke, and then ignite into flames and fire, and eventually explode. One of the common things that causes such, overheating. Aside from that, the situations have worsen, our children are not protected even on the social plain, such as YouTube and other forms of chat and communication that they use today. Know what your child are doing, speak with them because anyone can talk to them or lure them by means of these forms of media. We live in a day and age whereas people seek to cause harm and prey on children, such ones by going into schools, churches, and clubs, what have you. Education enables a child to react before an attack is made or an attack made by someone else, and this is vital, an example of an uneducated child, as of recent, is what is taking place in the realm of homosexuality and the trans community, and apparently, those who seek to prevent ill action are at a loss here vs. those who educate. Again, better solutions at work.

@TrueTomHarley One thing for certain. If the faith group in question having recreational time at a beach only to be stalked and taken by FSB affiliates to be held and interrogated, that is persecution. If a Russian professor is telling his students to target a girl because of her faith, sending underlings to speak of her even slander her, that is persecution. If religious folk is being targeted using the same tech the FSB used for Alexei Navalny Heroes, with the focus of reporting, calling, and confronting, that in of itself is persecution. The irony of it all, some Russians have been vocal about the twisting of Yarovaya law, but must of that was swept under the rug, or in this case, tossed out of the 10th floor of an apartment building, down into the bushes whereas no one would think to find it.

Your statement does not make any sense in this regard. I am of no group. But my field of study had required me to know the basics in this stuff, as is with other forms of technology. Therefore, basic to intermediate knowledge of this stuff is vital. My own culture forbids me to be as such. Then what is stopping you from knowing these basics? You had attempted to use false information whens aid basic information is enough truth to refute your claim and Witness' claim. And I know the links send that holds 5 minutes read time of information you ignored - twice. Yes. However this does not pertain to the actions of an owner of a legitimate trust and or stocks/bonds, what have you. Their actions does isn't a copy and paste on to an receiver and or a benefactor, the latter in this sense does not even have a care in the world for what an owner of said entity does for they're simply the receiver. And who are you addressing in this sense? The Owner/Investor of a trust, stock and or bond? A donor? An Investor? A Benefactor/Receiver? A Banker? A Broker? You can at least be more specific otherwise you will end up what you and Witness have done before by confusing all of them as one. The fact you are not specifying of whom you are referring to, an attempt to once again equate, your last statement does not make sense, nor any point of yours is revealed. If you want a focus, let's talk about An Owner of a Trust, a Stock(s) and or Bond(s). To which owner are you referring to and or other?

United The Right Rally Aug 11, 2017 – Aug 12, 2017 Location: Charlottesville, VA It was organized by: Jason Kessler (American white supremacist, neo-Nazi, and far-right political activist) Richard Spencer (A well known American white supremacist - the most hated one to the general public) Reasons why The protest was mostly notable for the death of Heather Danielle Heyer, whereas the left and the right attempt to use her tragic passing as a means to an end in regards to their goals, other, using her death to justify action. You must have skipped the papers if you have not heard this, and I am pretty sure I brought this into attention before: Look below, the first video present is by Brittany Hughes of MRCTV. NOTE: Regarding the 1st amendment the UN tried to dig their hands into it pertaining to the situation at the Unite the Right protest in Virginia, they took another shot, but this time, the 2nd amendment after the Las Vegas shooting, which is another situation on it's own. As for others, mind you, some of them are angry as is the first one regarding Brittany Hughes, so there is a bit of language, knowing you, it is not much of a problem. Below we see an example of someone who actually contributes to the United Nations Also, that being said, I am not a fan of Richard Spencer, not even by the slightest.

@Srecko Sostar Well he is very lucky those guys are not armed. As of recent, a thief entered a guy's home, long story short, he got the upper hand on the guy with the home owner's own gun. That being said, what I am asking you and Rook about of what is of high importance connections to some situations like this. Your example is like that of several cases in Brazil.

To some degree we still have such ones in the US - taking the law in their own hands, on the other side of the spectrum, such ones go at it with those they do not agree with. Outside of that you have those guys who are in their Batman and Superman costumes buying food to help out the homeless and say to themselves they are committing vigilante justice. That being said, it is groups like BAMN, Antifa, and the like that are a problem, one person in question whom I see as an adversary is among said groups. Other than that, with how things are going, it is likely such things will be revived at a grander scale.

No. In this regard, they are not the owner of the Trust and or Mutual Fund(s) whatsoever. A benefactor in this case does not even have that ability to even own said stocks and bonds if the owner of the stocks and bonds is the donor. Again - it shows how unaware and ignorant you are of what a Benefactor is, needless to say, you not understanding the position of an investor, pertaining to what I said to you before and even linked said information. Plus you are contradicting yourself in your last attempt to prove a business entity when in reality it is nothing more than a registry. A benefactor does not work for the owner who holds said stocks and bonds, in the same sense a person who received any donation of any kind from a charity that donates to a person and or group in question it does not automatically make the receiver an instant owner. That being said, children who are into economics and investments can tell the difference, apparently you and your friend do not. That's funny, your last few comments said otherwise, as is your claim with Jesus and Peter sometime ago. Hypocrisy is within you, Srecko. But I encourage you to continue to amuse me. Because when the proof of evidence is laid bear for all to see, it cannot be proven wrong. Your claims as is with Witness' claims do not merit the truth of information pertaining to money and finance, even outside of the realm of the Watchtower, legitimate information from investors, bankers, and or anyone in that field of study, even business, is able to say the same thing about the position of a stocks owner, a benefactor, a donor, etc. Yes, but not all persons. Some people use money to further advance goals, such as to raise a family, to take care of a person and or persons, their community, to give back, etc. In this sense, the money is primarily being used by the donor to advance their gospel teachings and expanding places of worship, covering the costs of said places and their community, and so forth. And you are one to talk whereas you assume such a thing is a sin, but you call back over your heels when Jesus himself used money from a fish to help one of his own and or the likes of him praising and attesting to example of a widow who gave money to the early church in support of the gospel. In your eyes, as is what you said of Issac's Father, you see Peter and the woman as though they have done something terrible of great sin - whereas in all instances I defended these people we read about in the Bible - you however, did not. And your point? How many silver coins helped out Peter? And why state this when there is no one being picky? The evidence we see is an owner of said stocks and bonds has donated to several benefactorial entities of their choosing. As I see it, said owner can do what he or she pleases with his or her money, moreover, any person and or group who received said money donation, the owner has no control over, the receiver can do what they wish with the money to benefit themselves, their community and or any other goal of theirs they have in mind. That being said, nothing you or Witness say can break unshakable facts about money and finance in the realm of funds and the like. Dare I ask if you guys know what crypto-currency is, I can predict already the nonsense that will follow when the truth can be found in basic, elementary information in the realm of crypto-currency, to which the both of you may be lacking in this domain.

That's not good. After what happen in Virginia, the common folk are not too pleased with the UN and their affairs, let alone even want them to police their streets.

Peace in these End Time and Tribulations is just a placebo effect.

Granted if one is aware of Russia and their allies, some people will consider it as such. After all, that one incident when men dressed as women showed up packing hit to provoke RU allies, only to be in a trap, giving Israel, a US ally, some form of confirmation to attest to an attack. There is indeed 2 factions of superpowers, and secondary allies, and dual binding force that is trying to take some minor control in both factions. Us Truthers know this.

And yet it does not negate what is being asked to you and Srecko. Not all the time because in some circumstances, it is an invitation to a gun fight for some people, and or an invitation to the person in question to be a target, as is with one female which in her case, it did not end well for her; since I am unfazed by graphic material, I will leave to your imagination as to why had occurred. The problem with this is it is not only places like this, you have soft targets as well and or minor targets. That being said, the question still stands, and as for the Krav Maga teacher, I am beginning to think he is non-existent if you can't even profess his or her belt class. I can name a few if need be, even for BJJ, Judo, etc. for in a respectful sense and credibility, one can simply bring up belt class and the latter can find and or loop up the person with or without a name.

But you agreed to every bit before of the claim of them owning stocks and bonds. You yourself even took the time to attempt to bring up a registry forum, making the claim that it is an up and legal business - hence engineering your own demise in this sense. That being said, now you post a contradiction, now to which information you say this, yet your past responses on this thread and agreement says otherwise, as is the lacking of trust funds as seen by you and Witness.

@Witness I have no goals in this regard, for if it is of anyone's concern, you were the one who continued off of something that has been concluded. Moreover, if you knew what a Benefactor is and or does, you'd realize the the contradiction you posted several times in this thread. And why the sudden change? Before you said they owned stocks and bonds when in reality, they are a benefactor, therefore they do not own anything. Scripture will not help your contradiction take off, let alone the failed exegesis in this domain regarding finance and money, therefore, I encourage you to learn the basics, of which you are evidently lacking in.

@BillyTheKid46 Yes. It also goes off on into the extreme when when you have legitimate apostates of a faith giving threats and even wishing death to JWs and ExJWs who are not apostates of the faith, like Mr. Gardener's action in Orange County, they ran a former student of JWs off the internet, so to speak, twice, when he proclaimed better options in dealing with problems, and on the other side of the spectrum, you have those who seek death and or destruction of others, attacking people of a faith when they had nothing to do with said issues and or problems, the list goes on. Although this happens for all religious ones, the ones, it is far worse to some than most.

Well you can't be somewhere else if the conflict is nearby and or in your actual location. Unless you somehow found a way for instant teleportation - that is understandable, but in all seriousness of active protection, this key component that is being asked of from the both of you is vital, and it is necessary. After all, something of this sort should be of seriousness to you also, Rook, for it is to me, and those who have said awareness and a bit of experience in this regard.

@Srecko Sostar But it should not stop you from knowing the difference between trust funds and a benefactor. If I had to ask you what trust funds are, would you be able to answer? If I were to ask you want kinds of trust funds exist, could you answer? As is with the other things, no evidence of the latter owning stocks and or bonds, if that was the case, Nintendo just hit records with a game selling on a game console. ExJWs professed the Watchtower has stocks in Nintendo, so I ask, how much money did the Watchtower make, if we are to advocate for the claims of ExJWs? The sales and numbers regarding Nintendo is down here as of recent: https://www.polygon.com/2018/12/18/18146266/super-smash-bros-ultimate-sales-nintendo-switch https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/11/putting-nintendo-switchs-8-2-million-us-switch-sales-in-context/ Nintendo Stocks https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ntdoy Now if we are to agree with Witness' claims, can you give me some information to the ExJW claim of the Watchtower owning stocks in companies like Nintendo? And although the information is here, the claim is unfounded, hence thoroughly debunked when the both of you confused things. Learn what a benefactor is, this time I will provide a small video for you because the both of you know that going to an investor's side to learn this stuff and or other defeats your claims:

And yet the ignorance you show in regards to stocks and bonds vs. trust/mutual present for all to see on this forum, in this thread. Nothing you say here negates the truth about trust funds, in which they are not to be confused with what stocks and bonds are, as is with what and who are the benefactors. That being said, being unaware of even the basics in finance befits the errors you profess - time and time again, Witness. Perhaps, at least the children I speak to and build up has the mentality to understand right from wrong, truth from untruth. They can explain to me the basics various things, and some who have went on their own path to dwell in finance and economics, they can explain to me what a trust fund is and what a mutual fund is, as is what an investor and what a benefactor is - and needless to say, they will not push falsehood by confusing what is what, to which what you are doing. It would be a pain to be a child of yours for, my own culture would be rooted out of me and if you were to say there is a pink gorilla was hiding in someone's basement, you'd push me to believe it, which this example can be applied in this sense. The irony of it all, it is not the truth about money and finance toppling your claims, but also, it is the blind hatred. You can agree with the latter or not, but the bottom-line is you cannot be this unaware of even the elementary basics in this domain, that is, money, finance, economics and all pertaining to it. Also as I told you over a dozen times - stop mixing verses, and even so, it will not help you when facts regarding what has already concluded cannot save you here, Witness, so you are pretty much beating a dead horse and throwing rocks at a titanium wall. The horse is no more and the wall cannot be broken down by stones. Therefore my statement still stands. If you do not know what a Benefactor is If you do not know the difference between a trust and or mutual fund is If you have no idea of who actually owns said stocks and or bonds If you do not know the role of an investor in regards to funds The the below response I stated That being said, educate yourself in this domain or do not say anything at all regarding this domain. Unless you have some knowledge in this regard, you should have shown that previously, but instead, you dwell on error, and once again information that came from the very person I spoke against before.

And yet your reaction before when you were corrected. The truth about finance does not care about your feelings or your misinformation, Srecko. For if you actually had something substantial to say, you would have said it, but again, I say, you wasted that chance, more so, anything in this domain cannot be countered and or refuted because when it comes to money and trust funds, the truth will be made known. That being said, even the basic knowledge of such is enough to refute false claims and those confusing and or attempt to connect stocks being the same as trust funds, vice versa. Then why in God's name were you trying to justify 2 falsehoods before if now to you proclaim such? The saying the facts does not care about feelings still stands, which lines up with being unaware and or ignorance of what a trust fund actually is. That being said, I find that last remark hard to believe when you didn't understand what an investor is and or does, I even went as far as to post said information from an investor source - which you ignored, twice. You can start by learning the basics in money, finance, investors, trust funds, etc. I provided links for you to read on this thread, the same ones you ignored twice. Perhaps this time you will make an effort to teach yourself the basics. And what about them? You are not poor, nor are you starving and this ability yo take in knowledge is being asked to you, not them. If that is the case, they my ISP comment to you a while back holds to truth. Therefore, you are re-directing, as I said earlier in this thread, and the other, you won't be running that card again. That being said, even a poor man can understand what a trust fund is, and from experience, I had run into poor persons who briefly lived on the streets who knew such things, as is with other domains of education. They should not negate your ability to learn something, and they are not you. Other than that, I have been helping the poor and the homeless for years, even posted a friend and a source here twice before who dedicated his life to such. Understand what stocks and bonds are. Understand what a trust/mutual fund is, understand that a registry cannot be used to justify stocks when that has already failed on your part. Learn what is a Benefactor, an Investor and anything pertaining to them.

No, I am not confusing you for someone else. Because it is worse. You have people walking around that you do not know if they are a man or a woman due to mental and physical changes and altercations they've done to themselves, and if you say a false pronoun you can get into big trouble. I told you before, I do not care if you care for something or not - a response can and will always be made, be it you like it or not, something will be said, Rook. It should have occurred to you by now in this regard. That being said, the same ones who remain unaware ends up being the same ones who are indirectly spoken of by those who embrace the ill-mentality pushed out by today's world.

@Srecko Sostar He isn't an apostate because he does not hold any connection to disgruntled Jehovah's Witnesses. His response and his knowledge in money & finance was to correct apostates. Other than that, I don't think you realize or even know what an Apostate even is. I suggest you read about those of a depraved mind as I will quote myself here: That being said, surely you could use said something that holds value, but you wasted the opportunity. Moreover, this one was able to pin point what a trust fund actuality was whereas both you and Witnesses tried to proclaim the latter had stocks and bonds - to which that information was false. Both of you also lack in knowledge of what an investor is and or does, as is with a benefactor, which can be seen in this thread with your attempt to use a Registry and Gasglow as evidence only to engineer your own failure. I rather you be serious than make weak responses, Srecko. Because the facts about money and finance in the realm of trust funds does not care for your feelings, for the facts in this matter is legitimate truth.

This still does not answer the question. Yes one can stay humble (although it sounds like something plastered in parts of a gym and or weight room) but when it comes to self-defense, there is one key component that is applied to those trained and untrained. This also leads to a step as to where what I am asking you for begets action done by person and or victim and or bystander should things escalate and or in the conflict in question (be it minor or major, to the most extreme). I will ask you again, Srecko, for you were adamant of defense, so such a elementary question should not be this difficult to answer. This is self-protection 101, why is it still you cannot answer when such a thing is of high importance? To give you a hint, it is simply ONE word. It isn't this hard. That being said, do you even know Krav Maga? And out of curiosity, the name of the teacher who said that and his current belt class.