Srecko Sostar

As i understand you Frida, you are young JW member. I am little surprised with your way of participation here. :)) You, as Witness in JWorg congregation have been taught to defend WT doctrines, not to defend religious beliefs of people who not belong to JW religion. :)) Also, if you have some doctrinal/religious questions your congregational elders would be glad to help you Frida. :)))) Of course, i said this just for fun. You are free to do what ever you want.

You never know what can be from "blurring". Maybe they prepare terrain for introducing "new light" how 144000 will stay on Earth and rule above Earthly class from much closer distance. Of course, this idea would be acceptable too. Because New Government Administration is better to be seen with literal eyes of Subjects, than with spiritual imagination. :))

:))))

our BOTH STATEMENTS ARE the TRUTH, IN SEPARATE CONTEXT ! :))))))))

Balaam's Donkey did, and Stones can preach too, according to Bible You mean this? :))))) Again, please go to https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/preach ... dictionary said what are the meanings of word PREACH.

preach verb UK /priːtʃ/ US /priːtʃ/ preach verb (IN CHURCH) [ I or T ] (especially of a priest or minister in a church) to give a religious speech to try to persuade other people to believe in a particular belief or follow a particular way of life: to give unwanted advice, especially about moral matters, in way: preach US verb [ I/T ] /pritʃ/ preach verb [ I/T ] (SPEAK IN CHURCH) to give a religious speech: to try to persuade other people to do or accept something To preach is also to try to persuade other people to have particular beliefs or behave in particular ways: Well, preach is not always about Gospel :)))

Find where and when i made this explicit quotes, word by word. :))))) You adding, doing this all the time, in every new sentence you made, a new "element" of my supposedly claiming this and that. You are comedian :)) and want to prove something that NOT EXISTING :)))

@Space Merchant Bible verses defending or destroying Own statements, and Ideas in Interpretations made by Readers, too. Accept that if you like. If you don't want, what I have with You :)) Your's and other people comments are free to be read by other people because all that comments are Open to Public. So, if i "jump" in it by my cleverness or stupidity why you are upset so much? Because you want to defend so called "truth"? What "truth" .. in final conclusion? Opinions more likely. :)))

... ears area too :)))

I was not being ironic, this badges with names will be helpful for sure :))

When we find differences and similarity of this two laws (God's and GB's) and to be able to make distinction about what authority supports and stand behind each "laws", and to be able to give resistance to human "laws", but on other hand to respect Higher Law, examples will be visible to us. :))

"Light get Brighter" only for WT Society Leaders in Bethel, and stopped at Bethel Place. Congregations was left to be in "Darkness Light" of previous doctrinal standpoint. :))))) Question is: Why would God want for minority of His people to know "The Truth" and to be able and in position to offer "unspoiled sacrifice, sacrifice without blame", ...... but for majority of His Flock He don't care and left them to be "unclean" spiritually and physically?? Irrational and illogical God? Or people can not understand His strange instructions ....from human standpoint of view ? Or, all is about Human Leadership who playing games/experiments with life of people/members/followers.

I need this in every day life :))) Memorized is hard task for me.

Oh, but i think how this reasoning can be problematic. Because, many past Servants of God received "direct revelations" of every sort and in various shapes and forms, but was/were still living in own errors daily, and their errors has been reflected many times on other people life.

policía federales :))))

I said this too, with other wording :)) Of course not. Imagination and associatively connecting this two sort of "badges" in your mind is not what i mean. :))) Purple triangle is forced by "Enemies" who made segregation by their normative. Convention Badge is voluntary identification of belonging to some group (religious in this case).

We are on Forum that caries this name: Jehovah’s Witnesses Open Club · 365 members well, it is quite ok that we steer into direction of WT an JWs :)))) Open Club · 365 members

Ok, Ok .... just calm down, i wished to upset you ...but not so much :))))

1 Pet 2:5 - As you come to him, a living stone rejected by men+ but chosen, precious to God,+ 5 you yourselves as living stones are being built up into a spiritual house+ to be a holy priesthood, in order to offer up spiritual sacrifices+ acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. this two sort of stones preaching too (offer up) :))))

Of course, it depends on listeners at convention how seriously they will take what was said From Platform! All what was said from Platform should be, need to be taken very seriously, and as such it have some sound, some sort Of Obligation to JW Members. In this Context @Jack Ryan have good point. I don't now how "seriously" elders want and have to empowered this thing about badges after convention program. But every "good" JW will take that very seriously and wearing his badge all days in purpose of Witnessing. I think how that is main point about badges, to promote JW religion. Of course, we have various perception on how that can look sometimes in some circumstances as @Anna mentioned. I remember International Convention in Nuremberg in 1998 i think. I saw a large group of delegates (think Germans, but not sure any more) who returned from restaurant. It is normal condition, after whole day of sitting, summer temperatures, big evening meal, beverages (wine or beer) slowly walked through road, a little sloppy because of the tiredness of each and every type, the clothes were no longer so neat, somehow looked under power of drink or tired or both :)) ,.... but they had badges.

SM, I gave you Bible verses. What you will do with them is your free will and choice. But you will not command other people here what to accept and what to not accept about it. You will not mastering over people here to play "debate games" by your rules or by "debating rules". If you feel yourself as "a winner" in "a debate" and as "a winner" over other people comments, and if such Idea in You gives you Permission to Insult.... ........i will not spoil your personal happiness about that :)))

Not really. It has been a issue only for the last 30 years, 30 years? ...this is funny i think. Issue was from Judge Rutherford era who was against Russell influence on Society. After Russell dead and after he prevailed in taking Presidency, he introducing changes (good or bad .. it is for Historians to describe) One of them is - NO beard! :)) Thanks for such deep, contemplative inspection of other people spirit and soul :)))) In just two sentences you done amazing job. Investigative Journalism?

Yes, they giving such advice, recommendation for delegates.

GB is run by Witnesses ? This is exclusive new information! Shall we wait Official Announcement from JWTV? or to believe You? :))

This time? I find it funny coming from a depraved fool Thanks a lot for this. You made strong arguments against my opinions :))))) according to SM link:https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-common-signs-of-a-person-that-is-losing-an-argument #6: Ad Hominem (Abusive) - resorting to abusing someone and calling them names because at this point you are running on fumes #7: Poisoning the well - The deux ex machina of logical fallacies. When everything else fails, go on a tirade to tarnish the image of your opponent.