Space Merchant

Making jokes regarding something in connection with the  Ukraine-Russia situation? Attribute common to some who are unaware.
Your example doesn't really even equate to what you brought up this time. Nor does it have anything to do with suspicious granted the term Propaganda was used and MSM - read carefully.
Not a good look. As stated before, I encourage you to do research further as is wait for further information instead of dwelling on speculation, you cannot just assume it came from one side or the other because BBC tagged a name on to it. Your link is only 2 days old...
Example of image:

 
I mean, after all, this was from you, of course...
You are saying it's Ukrainian but your source seems to point out otherwise.
Your comments - Mystery drone from Ukraine war crashes in Croatia.
Like I said, don't put too much trust in the MSM, even if it is in your country.
Just so you know unlike the Right, the Left Paradigm that is heavily leaning tends to add/remove things to events and or stories (like that of a literal Ghost shooting down Jets), even going as far as to be among the ones to promote war mongering and propagandize for it for Ukraine. As we speak they're continuing with information that is deemed questionable. Granted BBC News is Left-Wing, as mentioned, they'll do such things, for earlier on during the war, they used false videos and should something happen, they pin the latter to the event, hence Snake Island and now the situation with the Ukrainian Mayor. They're promoting Ukrainian s a victor but Russia abruptly takes ground. 
 
This is one of several examples.
I believe I stated people falling victim to Babylon and the Wild Beast, this is an example also granted of how useful of a tool the MSM can be for some, if one does not fully know the situation too well and simply accept what the MSM tells them.

You know that you mention it, America is suspect in a lot of things, even when it comes to killing their own to hide information.

Social media are destroying us, which you already know. Were zombie movies just priming us for the mass madness that is to come? Russia is planning to label Facebook/Instagram Meta an “extremist organization.” Well, if it’s any consolation, Facebook Meta’s stock price dropped about 50% in the last 6 months, dragging Mark Zuckerberg’s fortune down with it.

It's fine, a lot of what is said is in the beginning of the thread. At least they have an idea.
Usually things of this nature is sourced first, eventually gets to reddit and similar websites, some of them, prior to branching out elsewhere.
That being said, not sure if you have one, but just keep a malware scan in case. As mentioned before, main page, you are safe, but clicking anything outside of it, is risky. If you want to just move with caution on the main page, it doesn't hurt to right-click, check the link address before going any further.

Concerning 1975 they simply mentioned things of which some people speculated.
It is in relation hence your other comments, there no different. 
Unless you want to move on to another topic, you are free to do so.

There is PDF data stored. It seems that fellow might have copied a website (WebCopy) content with database for a quick response. I would say, just visiting that site is dangerous if you don't have proper safeguards in place.

One of the domains I was able to trace to San Francisco, unless the other 3 are located elsewhere, so that might be the case. The main page is evidently on the main domain, but the other stuff is outside of the page.
Yes, so it is safe to shut out the browser completely better to be safe then take a potential risk.
The source of where Witness may have gotten the link is possibly Reddit, the website in question is in connection with this person - 
 

 
Not only he has a strong disdain for JWs, but also God. Seeing his mannerism, he is most likely a younger person.

It's fine, a lot of what is said is in the beginning of the thread. At least they have an idea.
Usually things of this nature is sourced first, eventually gets to reddit and similar websites, some of them, prior to branching out elsewhere.
That being said, not sure if you have one, but just keep a malware scan in case. As mentioned before, main page, you are safe, but clicking anything outside of it, is risky. If you want to just move with caution on the main page, it doesn't hurt to right-click, check the link address before going any further.

One should definitely be very careful with such things.

Thank you for this info…I didn’t know this.

The problem with speculation is that those who understand context will be ad odds with those in their community, which was the situation in those days. If you have one JW debating another JW on what was read and heard in those days, that in of itself is a dead giveaway that speculation caused people to lean on their own understanding of things, granted the 60s and the 70s concerning Christianity for both factions tend to a thing, and regarding JWs, they themselves were caught in this too.
As for the Apostles, they are good comparisons as is those that came after them. Likewise with any Churches that existed in the 1st century where some small/minor understanding seems to get the best of people. For example, The Church of Corinth. Another, Apollos, in which in that situation, people had their own understanding in which Apostle Paul had to deal with that situation where the understanding caused different groups in the church, Paul himself was notified by members of the church, namely the household of Chloe (of whom Srecko and Witness tried to convince me she was a church leader when she isn't.)

Which is the norm to those who adhere to The Commission, from the day they start to their last breathe, they eventually go to sleep in death and those who God knows to be with him, will be called by the Christ (John 14:13, 5:28, 29, Acts 24:15 [parallels to Prophet Isaiah - Isa. 25:8, 26:19]), the situation is a bit different for those of the Firstfruits, God's chosen. 
Do what is right in God's eyes, as is the Commission commanded by the Christ for the end of the End Times is near.
Rests of their days - an Idiom to natural cause - death. [To spend the remaining portion of one's life (doing something or being some place).] You do realize that people do what they do until the remaining theirs of their life.
Granted it states days, it can equate to months and or years, no one knows when it is their time to expire, so in life they take action, as we can see here as already addressed, in the 60s and 70s there was zeal to minister for the Commission, in those days it wasn't only the JWs who had this zeal, but those of the other action.
This is also obvious because historically, the 1070s was the Fourth and Final Great Awakening in which Christian zeal was in abundance.
This has nothing to do with the article concerning 1975, and I haven't seen that in the archived article written anywhere. Remember what Deut. 4:2 says and apply it.
The 1974 archived article, a year and a few months shy from the 1975 narrative, was already addressed in the other page, although @Pudgy got the archived image of it, the focused quotes were pulled for context.
All in all, once again Matthew 24 and 25 as is 1 John 2:17 was ignored, hence why it was brought up once again.
 
Surely, you know how to read a Bible verse, Apostle John himself proclaimed until his exiled, until the end of his day.
Unfortunately, it comes down to understanding.
Half believed in what was said in context. The other Half assumed otherwise and took action. In both groups, the claim that this day/year would be it. Moreover them preaching the gospel would not be a thing due to Matthew 24 and 25 as is the verse in John. There was indeed arguments and debate based discussions with within the JW community due to these 2 views - hence speculation.
From what I am aware, their religious leaders at the time never made the claim, as did any of their works starting from 1966 (hence Witness' original post where her quoted stated they did - was wrong - I still have the links to the original threads). The End is Near, which is true, but the End being specifically 1975 whereas even a list of factors deem otherwise, speculation, hence why they addressed in later on down to human error and or understanding (the part you excluded from your source).
Jesus was pretty clear when he told Christians to gospel preach, be committed to the Commission, and the the End would come, hence Matthew 24 and 25. He made that clear to his Apostles and other followers of Christ, for they were aware that the End is near and they must proclaim the Messianic Message as is tell people about God's Kingdom, likewise, with that information, it is up to the people to either accept or not.
It is more logic and reading comprehension, the thing is, would you allow the knowledge read in full context, or speculate.
Sadly, to your behest, they never made the claim. No one knows, however speculation can be drawn compared to most in that day who assume it will happen by other means; which can cause a domino effect.
 

Mystery drone from Ukraine war crashes in Croatia.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60709952
Is this the rest of the days of our lives?

@Witness This is what I was talking about concerning spoofing:
The first image (image A) is from your link, if clicked in combination it intertwines with JW.org. The second image (image B) is the legitimate JW.org, for the image concerning Ukraine was there the other day and suddenly the link you provided already for spoofed images of a recently shown image. The third image (image C) is from your link that if you manage to find the re-directs, it mirrors exactly the same as JW.org, and there is a possible risk for anyone who clicks on a link or try to login. The 4th image (image D) is what JW.org was just a few days ago in which Image A was updated to match it soon after it was changed to Image B.
Both JW.org and your link also has a workable logon page so you don't know which one is true or false if you don't pay attention.
The Red Flag here is that once you go to the spoofed website, most, if not all re-directs to JW.org, which is a problem because if the website was to have archived all information collected by JWs and EXJWs, why is there a need to have a replicated site that re-directs on purpose?
Image A
Image B
 
Image C
 
Image D
 
Here are other examples, Image A.1 is JW.org and Image B.1 is the spoofed website
Image A.1
Image B.1
Identical if one isn't paying attention because they'll simply be confused, very confused and possibly think the website is hacked and or other serious scenarios. Image B.1 automatically re-directs to JW.org, in addition to that, the IP of JW.org is also semi-mirrored here, so in a sense, it does slowly lean into the copyright waters as @Dmitar mention. At the time time, it is woeful deception.
 
Lastly, granted this website assumes JWs to be a Cult, thus whomever made the website adopted the Cult Ideology concerning Christians, some of the things used in the replicated spoof website, he/she mocked God (Jehovah/Yahweh) and mocked Jesus, not to mention shown a lowkey racist remark towards Chinese people. He/She continued to mock God directly concerning COVID-19, and made fun of God to assume as if he was part of a drug cartel/drug growing duo from a drama series, I doubt you or anyone elsewhere here assumes God, Jehovah/Yahweh to be part of a Drug Trade type of thing. Granted the history of this website, despite it's infancy, there has been some remark changes to further mock Jehovah's Witnesses, The Watchtower, as is to mock Christ, the son of God, and His Father, due to this, it can be deduced that this person isn't an EXJW, but an Anti-JW, who is not only disgruntled, but also has a level of hatred for God himself. Hence in Apostasy, the notion of one being alienated from God.
The person in archived versions of this replica also mocked the Bible and the Holocaust... Considers Jesus a Fairytale, as is all written about him.
More mockery in the last image 

With the stuff I have seen, having to close my browser and open it constantly... I can't even said "That being said" for this response instead "What on God's Green Earth" is more appropriate here.
But really, you should have known what you are linking, this is way examine, even research is key, you can't post things without knowing. In this case, it is more than simply spoofing, but rather influences of an Anti-JW, more so, someone who is in the camp of the Atheistism community similar to Jack on this forum but more severe, granted, the notions are met to hit beyond JWs themselves.
It gets even more worse
[Because we witness, or never shut up about Jehovah: Jehovah this, Jehovah that, Jehovah God, our God Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah; we are known as Jehovah’s Witnesses. This is a parody homepage but you can explore our real life cult website by clicking on any of the links you see here. Read our own cult Bible online. Learn more about how we break apart families by practising an extreme form of shunning]
What I see that is ironic, he says that it is a parody website, but you cannot claim parody by spoof replication with assets, in most cases, that do not belong to you. Legal action can be taken should someone choose. He/She even go as far as to admit to the re-direct links which are potentially not safe.
NOTE: Unlike trademark law, copyright law does not presume commercial use. Under copyright law, “not all parody is protected; instead, parody, 'like any other use, has to work its way through the relevant factors.
None of them pertain to replication and spoofs.
The latter also admitted to spoofing....

 
This won't end well once people start to realize all of this...
People will obviously be upset, you should be too. People who mock God directly, equating, in this regard, Jehovah your God, to Drug dealers in a Drug trade or jokingly calling him a Spaghetti Monster is indeed a problem. A serious one.

Because I dwell in IT (I branch out in a few things in that domain), there are things, tools we use to scan websites, and that is in connection with the device I use which is passive, there are 3rd parties too.
Broken links appear as such below if you click on things outside of the main page itself:

It loops you in with every click. They're not only broken, but they're fillers; possibly just for show.
You can have fun with this one - https://accessjw.org/en/index_20211223.html
It does not take 15 minutes. Scan only took less than 2 minutes. That is how I got the Age of the Domain also, and IP. Scans normally take anywhere from a few seconds to 5 or so minutes. The website only had 4 domains also. 15 or more minutes is like trying to go through, for example JP Morgan, however, that is a well secured 443 and rarely are links broken they get terminated.
The site even suggested it is an affiliated Trademark, granted most replicated assets do not belong to them. even if it is a joke to say TM, it is serious when it comes to copyright.

 
Hence Laws
https://www.ny-trademark-lawyer.com/trademarks-that-falsely-suggest-a-connection-with-other-persons.html
https://500law.com/trademark-registration-fraud/
This in combination with TM remarks, potentially spoof/hacking, direct linking to JW.org via some links via redirection, is an extremely high possibility of a bad situation waiting to happen should an entity look at this. Nintendo levels of law is something no one wants if caught.
That is because you are on the Main Page of the domain. When you click outside of it, it brings you to the image as shown above, even blanks.
Main Pages are not so much effected with Domains in it's infancy stage.
No. However, a lot of this stuff was collected over the years, some of which JWs and EXJWs know about, as is the debates and discussions around them, that is why I brought up the Trust, the same documentation was brought up when the EXJW refuted Mr. Zelda's claims, which is ironic that I mention this now because I just told Dmitar about it not too long ago in a response.
Because no one wants to be unknowingly traced and or key logged, or worse, if they click out of the domain, especially the login which is sketchy, can easily get someone's email/username along with password, to net-packed back to the domain outside of JW.org, a data-breach.
The Gateway to JW.org may be compromised, hence the example given.
One is better off with the other known domain used by your community, you already have JWfacts, do you not? Even for them, they would NOT make such a move that puts them in the crosshairs of entities of whom one cannot truly comprehend their movements; uncommon, for these types are in line with The Alphabet Boys.
Spoofing is nothing to be joked about. If you do not warn people to be careful, you can inadvertently put JWs and EXJWs at risk if they don't know this stuff. And this can ensue ramifications of possibly entities that have nothing to do with the Watchtower, especially, if someone accidently got victimized by a spoof the other way around is to pin blame on the Watchtower for hacking people without them even know what happened prompting the Watchtower to figure out who did what, in this case, you'll have victims, the Watchtower, and Entities you do not want coming for you, to zero in on the cause.
That being said, whatever domains remain of the information on the main page, it would be best for anyone, even EXJWs to stick with that solely instead of the latter.
But really, a 443 with filler/broken links is not a good look. If you do not know what that is, 443 is an Internet Protocol (Port), in English, its HTTPS:\\ associated with the Secure Socket Layer.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spoofing.asp
Knowing this stuff is of my expertise. Stuff like this, the people should know.
Technology is a blessing and a curse.
The World Wide Web (Internet) is a blessing and a curse
It all comes down to how it is used, for some people have bad intent to use such things against someone.

The website is simply a collection of things from other domains and archived domains, etc. So any documentation, templates, and or the like that was gathered over the years, was simply moved here. Example would be the heavily refuted Henrietta Riley Trust documentation.
Half of the site is dead (Filler/Broken Links), which means the Age of the Domain is in it's infancy stage, it is 10 months old, a day shy of 25 days birth place San Francisco. Only the main page has items, most of which is simply stuff rehashed and gathered to put here (half of the things mentioned on this forum can be searched out here), meaning, one or a few domains have been labeled deceased, terminated, so to speak, which is a common thing.
There are links that goes straight to JW.org, which can be a potential land mine situation which can take effect for anyone who visits outside of specific spots of the website, so an example would be should a JW with a logon click on a link, goes to JW.org and login, they can potentially get hacked. A bit risky with the infancy Domain Age. So you could (if you want to) advise the people to close out their browser completely afterwards just to be safe. Just because it's a 443 and not an 80, does not mean there are risks.
Speaking about spoofing, it is made to look like a replica of the site used by JWs, which is a red flag. As to why a replica is used, possibly to draw attention; from the Watchtower itself outside of confusing people, to to get any EXJW who left the pack to return, etc.
Granted most of the stuff is archived, old stuff, it would have made sense to simply just make a stand-a-lone domain. Kind of a clue there hence broken links.
Website spoofing -  is the creation of a replica of a trusted site with the intention of misleading visitors to a phishing site. Legitimate logos, fonts, colors and functionality are used to make the spoofed site look realistic.
That being said be careful of what you click on. Also whomever started the site must be really obsessed with the Cult ideology and pinning it on an organized Restorationist. This also reminds me of the website from Russia used to ID/track people almost which my contact aided in shutting down.
In short - This is simply another domain with things transferred over, hence Domain Age.

Because I dwell in IT (I branch out in a few things in that domain), there are things, tools we use to scan websites, and that is in connection with the device I use which is passive, there are 3rd parties too.
Broken links appear as such below if you click on things outside of the main page itself:

It loops you in with every click. They're not only broken, but they're fillers; possibly just for show.
You can have fun with this one - https://accessjw.org/en/index_20211223.html
It does not take 15 minutes. Scan only took less than 2 minutes. That is how I got the Age of the Domain also, and IP. Scans normally take anywhere from a few seconds to 5 or so minutes. The website only had 4 domains also. 15 or more minutes is like trying to go through, for example JP Morgan, however, that is a well secured 443 and rarely are links broken they get terminated.
The site even suggested it is an affiliated Trademark, granted most replicated assets do not belong to them. even if it is a joke to say TM, it is serious when it comes to copyright.

 
Hence Laws
https://www.ny-trademark-lawyer.com/trademarks-that-falsely-suggest-a-connection-with-other-persons.html
https://500law.com/trademark-registration-fraud/
This in combination with TM remarks, potentially spoof/hacking, direct linking to JW.org via some links via redirection, is an extremely high possibility of a bad situation waiting to happen should an entity look at this. Nintendo levels of law is something no one wants if caught.
That is because you are on the Main Page of the domain. When you click outside of it, it brings you to the image as shown above, even blanks.
Main Pages are not so much effected with Domains in it's infancy stage.
No. However, a lot of this stuff was collected over the years, some of which JWs and EXJWs know about, as is the debates and discussions around them, that is why I brought up the Trust, the same documentation was brought up when the EXJW refuted Mr. Zelda's claims, which is ironic that I mention this now because I just told Dmitar about it not too long ago in a response.
Because no one wants to be unknowingly traced and or key logged, or worse, if they click out of the domain, especially the login which is sketchy, can easily get someone's email/username along with password, to net-packed back to the domain outside of JW.org, a data-breach.
The Gateway to JW.org may be compromised, hence the example given.
One is better off with the other known domain used by your community, you already have JWfacts, do you not? Even for them, they would NOT make such a move that puts them in the crosshairs of entities of whom one cannot truly comprehend their movements; uncommon, for these types are in line with The Alphabet Boys.
Spoofing is nothing to be joked about. If you do not warn people to be careful, you can inadvertently put JWs and EXJWs at risk if they don't know this stuff. And this can ensue ramifications of possibly entities that have nothing to do with the Watchtower, especially, if someone accidently got victimized by a spoof the other way around is to pin blame on the Watchtower for hacking people without them even know what happened prompting the Watchtower to figure out who did what, in this case, you'll have victims, the Watchtower, and Entities you do not want coming for you, to zero in on the cause.
That being said, whatever domains remain of the information on the main page, it would be best for anyone, even EXJWs to stick with that solely instead of the latter.
But really, a 443 with filler/broken links is not a good look. If you do not know what that is, 443 is an Internet Protocol (Port), in English, its HTTPS:\\ associated with the Secure Socket Layer.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spoofing.asp
Knowing this stuff is of my expertise. Stuff like this, the people should know.
Technology is a blessing and a curse.
The World Wide Web (Internet) is a blessing and a curse
It all comes down to how it is used, for some people have bad intent to use such things against someone.

I FOUND A SCAN OF THE 1974 KINGDOM MINISTRY MENTIONED ABOVE !
Here it is !
 

The AP reports that half of American adults were exposed to harmful lead levels as children. Lead poisoning never goes away—and it even gets passed down to one’s children. Is this one of the big roots of American psychosis?

@Matthew9969 From what I know, Grey Men/Women usually blend in with the crowd but move in a way to not be in the spotlight. My friend's Dad act in this way. Some of these guys also prepared for any kind of situation, even confrontation, women especially. In short, if there is danger, the crowd runs in one direction into the danger, the Grey Man/Woman does not. So no one would really steal from them because of their high situational awareness to their surroundings and time used wisely.

https://accessjw.org/rtk/

Well this should surprise you, they believe the Watchtower owns military assets, this is why I mentioned Mr. Zelda and missiles in which Witness was defending when she was refuted by an EXJW who has knowledgeable in Economics. Even when refuted they continue. Some also believe they have assets in Nintendo as is Victoria's Secret.
It makes no sense, a 2+2=5 situation.

The remark about Gun bunkers came forth from the debate (with multiple subjects for the latter loves to deviate) with Srecko and Witness, evidence to what is true/false is noted in the source presented in the pervious page. Witness made several claims in regards to JWs and the WT using sources such as Rick Fearon and Zelda and a list of ExJW information, however, what she did not realize is not all ExJWs are disgruntled, resulting in some being aware of any knowledge in Funds and other things to speak up against the people of their own community. This also brought forth the notation of the Watchtower somehow being owners of companies that are essentially into military weapons dealings (as is a gaming company and women's lingerie in which some believe they own)
Witness was challenged on this, and all her conspiratorial claims were proven false. In the same source, she attempted to allude the idea that JWs have connection to a Democratic party members, however, this was also false because it is alluded it was actually Fearon who probably held some Leftist backing, to which some believe this to be the case after doing some research. Then Srecko hopped in and made a fool of himself in the process.
In regards to @Dmitar who believes guests are not aware, in that same source, guests were interacting in that same discussion, and saw both Witness and Srecko's claims to not only be problematic, but false, mainly due to the fact the most powerful source in that thread was from an ExJW who challenged disgruntled ExJWs on Economics, money and bonds. Even much later, Witness attempted this again using a redittor associated with Smurf Girl, a conspiracy theorist, once again attempting to link JWs to a Democratic candidate for the Senate this time, Raphael Warnock (D) is an American pastor and politician serving as senior pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church. In Witness' claim, anything that had the term "Watchtower" she automatically assume it is associated with JWs, however, this is false, God forbid if she connects the WT to DC Comics who also uses the term. Then there is the situation with Newscorp, prior to the Redress Scheme, something I believe you are familiar with, whereas you, Witness, and Srecko were fooled by an Alt-Right media source with information that has nothing to do with the WT in order to draw in readers and clicks for the Redress situation in Australia, which as of recent, is a broken country where CSA is highly problematic now.
This is why I take issue with the MSM, they obscure things, even now, they beat the drums of war, of which was predicted by most for several years, hence the actions of the Guardian, NYT, Atlantic, CNN, MSNBC, etc. - The paradigm is a joke.
I already know Rook and James are one in the same, as is the other.
You seem to miss the plot. James does not house weapons under the churches of JWs, as mentioned earlier, this narrative was from Witness' source. These weapons, even poison, etc are alleged to be used for mass killings, and self harm. These Fearon types profess such these ideas and some made videos in the EXJW community. For instance, Anna, Arauna, and JWI are JWs, will they commit mass murder with weapons and poison because no one would accept the Bible's message? No. Do they side with the military in highly danger weapon grades? No. Would they commit to self harm as some ExJWs believe they would that equal to the level of the events of Jim Jones? No. Do the leaders of the JW faith attest to wiping themselves and or their enemies out on a Holy War-sque path? No.
Even the guests saw this is a great falsehood being professed from both Witness and Srecko, who tried to defend her.
James is very familiar with the notation of bearing arms, as is the 2nd amendment, so much so I remember talking to him about self defense, however, James isn't the type to go down an extremist/terrorist route, nor is this the intent of any JW present, no matter how most EXJWS fuel such an idea, which can be dangerous. In one thread not only we mentioned how to better protect children, but with the inclusion of self-defense, this was discussed.
This is why both Srecko and Witness were very wrong for attempting to protect a man/group (in Srecko's case, defend Witness on this) who advocate for such a nonsensical idea. What is ironic that even some disgruntled ones find Rick Fearon to be insane, more so of his actions.
The below is just a snippet of that, my response to Witness...
 
 
The issue is Guns, weapons, and poisons, bunkered inside and under JW churches, a claim proven to be false. Let alone the mass murder idea.
Firearms are legal in the United States, it is constitutional, the second amendment, right to bare arms, etc.
In James' case, in his own thread he mentioned good guys with guns.

James' discussion on the matter was a grounded one via example, in which everyone was engaged, both guests, even Admin, made remarks.
This was one of several.
 
Witness and Srecko were already debated on this, the source is in one of my responses in regards to JW and money on this thread. Sadly, Witness has turned herself into Lisa Haven, and Srecko, a White Knight of Haven.

Not to mention some people have started to become somewhat racist against Russians, namely Facebook/META.
Some people also noted that in Mariupol, Azov was also in the area prior to what the Russians did, then again, one has to really research these things. As for the Syrians, they are a known Russian ally so it was no surprise any of their allies would support them. China is in the books still, some speculate North Korea also.
It's going to get messy going forward, and everyone will pay indirectly unfortunately.

The Ukraine War got uglier this week. Heavier sanctions were imposed, Russia deliberately bombed a maternity hospital, Russia started recruiting “volunteer” “soldiers” from the Middle East Syria, and there are fears that Vladimir Putin, currently the world’s most hated man, may resort to chemical —or even nuclear— weapons as his situation grows more paranoid and desperate. Reports are emerging that Russia’s attack on a nuclear power plant was almost much, much worse. And it’s only like week three of this War. This is Collapse.