Jump to content
The World News Media

Η Ανάσταση του Ιησού—Τι Σημαίνει ;;


ARchiv@L

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

jw-archive.org.jpg

 

16 Η ανάσταση του Ιησού επικυρώνει όλα όσα δίδαξε. Ο Παύλος έγραψε ότι, αν ο Χριστός δεν είχε εγερθεί από τους νεκρούς, η Χριστιανική πίστη και το κήρυγμα θα ήταν μάταια. Ένας Βιβλικός λόγιος έγραψε: «Αν ο Χριστός δεν έχει εγερθεί, . . . τότε οι Χριστιανοί δεν είναι παρά τα αξιοθρήνητα θύματα μιας τεράστιας απάτης». Χωρίς την ανάσταση του Ιησού, οι αφηγήσεις των Ευαγγελίων είναι απλώς μια θλιβερή ιστορία για έναν καλό και σοφό άνθρωπο που θανατώθηκε από τους εχθρούς του. Αλλά ο Χριστός πράγματι εγέρθηκε, επιβεβαιώνοντας πόσο αληθινά ήταν όλα όσα δίδαξε, περιλαμβανομένων και όσων είπε για το μέλλον.Διαβάστε 1 Κορινθίους 15:14, 15, 20.

17 Ο Ιησούς είπε: «Εγώ είμαι η ανάσταση και η ζωή. Αυτός που ασκεί πίστη σε εμένα, ακόμη και αν πεθάνει, θα έρθει στη ζωή». (Ιωάν. 11:25) Αυτή η συγκλονιστική δήλωση θα εκπληρωθεί οπωσδήποτε. Ο Ιεχωβά έχει δώσει στον Ιησού τη δύναμη να επαναφέρει στη ζωή, όχι μόνο όσους ανασταίνονται σε πνευματική ζωή στον ουρανό, αλλά και τα δισεκατομμύρια άτομα που θα εγερθούν με την προοπτική της αιώνιας ζωής στη γη. Η εξιλαστήρια θυσία του Ιησού και η ανάστασή του σημαίνουν ότι ο θάνατος θα πάψει να υπάρχει. Δεν σας ενισχύει αυτό να υπομείνετε οποιαδήποτε δοκιμασία, αντιμετωπίζοντας με θάρρος ακόμη και το θάνατο;

18. Τι εγγυάται η ανάσταση του Ιησού;

18 Η ανάσταση του Ιησού μάς δίνει τη διαβεβαίωση ότι οι κάτοικοι της γης θα κριθούν σύμφωνα με τους στοργικούς κανόνες του Ιεχωβά. Μιλώντας σε μια ομάδα αντρών και γυναικών στην αρχαία Αθήνα, ο  Παύλος είπε: «[Ο Θεός] έχει προσδιορίσει ημέρα κατά την οποία σκοπεύει να κρίνει την κατοικημένη γη με δικαιοσύνη μέσω ενός άντρα τον οποίο διόρισε, και έδωσε εγγύηση σε όλους τους ανθρώπους ανασταίνοντάς τον από τους νεκρούς». (Πράξ. 17:31) Ναι, ο Ιησούς είναι ο Κριτής που έχει διορίσει ο Θεός, και μπορούμε να είμαστε σίγουροι ότι η κρίση του θα είναι δίκαιη και στοργική.Διαβάστε Ησαΐας 11:2-4.

19. Πώς μας επηρεάζει η πίστη μας στην ανάσταση του Χριστού;

19 Η πίστη στην ανάσταση του Ιησού μάς υποκινεί να κάνουμε το θέλημα του Θεού. Χωρίς το θυσιαστικό θάνατο και την επακόλουθη ανάστασή του, θα παραμέναμε υπό την καταδίκη της αμαρτίας και του θανάτου. (Ρωμ. 5:12· 6:23) Αν ο Ιησούς δεν είχε αναστηθεί, θα μπορούσαμε κάλλιστα να λέμε: «Ας φάμε και ας πιούμε, γιατί αύριο θα πεθάνουμε». (1 Κορ. 15:32) Αλλά εμείς δεν επικεντρωνόμαστε στις απολαύσεις της ζωής. Αντ’ αυτού, θεωρούμε πολύτιμη την ελπίδα της ανάστασης και έχουμε κάθε λόγο να ακολουθούμε την κατεύθυνση του Ιεχωβά σε όλα τα πράγματα.

 


 

Η ΣΚΟΠΙΑ (ΕΚΔΟΣΗ ΜΕΛΕΤΗΣ) ΝΟΕΜΒΡΙΟΣ 2014
https://www.jw.org/el/εκδόσεις/περιοδικά/w20141115/


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 539
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
    • In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some.
    • Would it be too much to ask what was the bible students starting point of creation?
    • @JW Insider Your summary is irrelevant, as I do not make any assertions regarding BC/AD other than their usage by scholars and in history, as you yourself have also acknowledged on numerous occasions, thus rendering your point invalid and evasive. The Watchtower leverages external viewpoints, including secular evidence, to substantiate the accuracy of their chronological interpretations. There are numerous approaches to dating events. Personally, I explore various alternative methods that lead to the same conclusion as the Watchtower. However, the most captivating approach is to utilize secular chronology to arrive at the same outcome. By relying solely on secular chronology, the pattern still aligns, albeit with a distinct interpretation of the available data. Nevertheless, the ultimate result remains unchanged. This is why when you get upset, when you are proven wrong, you, Tom, and those with the authority to ban take action, because you like others cannot handle the truth. In this case, your infamous tablet VAT 4956 has become useless in this situation. I do agree with you on one thing: you are not an expert, just like COJ. However, I must admit that this foolish individual was not the first to debate the chronology with the Watchtower and abandon it based on personal beliefs. He simply happened to be the most recent one that's on record.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.