Jump to content
The World News Media

Genesis 6:21 and pre-flood food?


Many Miles

Recommended Posts

  • Member
6 minutes ago, John Houston said:

Nothing in my comments ruled out that Eve would breastfeed her children...

Speak plainly. Does your comment above yield that it was permitted for humans to eat milk though, as you said, there was nothing said about milk?

8 minutes ago, John Houston said:

...but animals died, their decaying bodies were removed as we see such bodies removed today; flying carrion birds, scavenger mammals, maggots and underground bugs and worms that dispose of the bone, also. Returning it all to the dust!

Birds, scavenger mammal, maggots, bugs and worms are all part of the animal kingdom, yet as you suggested earlier, there was nothing said about animals eating meat. Yet carrion is meat.

Hence, despite nothing be said explicitly about eating things other than vegetation, other foods were eaten other than vegetation and eating these was neither contrary to creation nor was doing so sin.

It sounds like you agree that meat was a food eaten prior to the flood. According to you, carrion birds, scavenger mammals, maggots, bugs and worms (all these are animals) were eating meat long before the flood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 2.6k
  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

That is the most insane conclusion I have read since last week’s Babylon Bee! Although some scripture may be twisted into a pretzel to suggest a Snickers Candy Bar is nature’s most perfect food!

What motivated you to shift the topic from spoiled meat to breast milk?

Do you mean to imply that you are closer to perfection than those who initiated humanity? This proposition seems preposterous. Although sin continues to be a part of our lives, it is crucial to acknow

Posted Images

  • Member

In the Garden of Eden, meat was not considered as part of the approved edible options, as it did not grow on trees. God, who holds the sacredness of blood due to its association with life, had another reason to prohibit the consumption of meat in this "perfect" paradise. It is important to note that in the rare event of an animal dying within the Garden, it would be respectfully buried. No doubt how Abel was buried after the soul (blood) of Abel screamed out to God.

Adam and Eve were commanded by God to multiply, and this instruction also extended to the animal kingdom. The question arises: in a perfect world, would animals die? While we know that "man" would not, what about animals? This assumption as humans we get from dinosaurs, but would it have been the same thing in a perfect setting?
The question remains pertinent even after the millennial reign, as mankind will return to perfection. At present, the notion of carrion, deceased animals, carcasses, and rotten meat is purely speculative and may stem from a person's hunger.
I've previously mentioned my support for breastfeeding in this forum. Nonetheless, would it have been the sole option for feeding babies in a utopian setting?

The key word here is perfection, which none of the things man has thought of after the expulsion would have been thought of inside the garden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.