Jump to content
The World News Media

Malawi and MCP Cards?


Many Miles

Recommended Posts

  • Member
19 minutes ago, JW Insider said:

Blood made it taboo, and therefore blood WAS considered a sacred substance by decree of God himself.

If that were true then God was definitely acting contrary to His own sacred standard for specifically providing unbled flesh of carcasses found dead of natural cause to be eaten by descendants of Noah. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 13.3k
  • Replies 476
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It took a while for me to realize that, among some branches of Christians, there is virtue in ‘moving beyond’ the Bible. Most Witnesses will assume that if they can demonstrate they are adhering to th

I think it would seem to be quite presumptuous to say that we are the only spokesperson that God is using. Not my words. But I agree with the sentiment. The early Christian church found it diffic

I think that some brothers feel they can do a lot more good for both the organization and the congregations overall by not declaring themselves apostates, even if they hold beliefs different from the

Posted Images

  • Member
1 hour ago, TrueTomHarley said:

I have never heard this before? Where did you?

”Where did this pooch get his wisdom? Is this not Pudgy, who we used to walk every day?”

I developed this understanding when I started integrating information from all sources, and STOPPED ignoring hard evidence.

It explains who Cain was afraid of and why they would want to kill him on sight, even if he wandered a thousand miles away.

It even explains who Cain “married” in exile.

It even explains the Aborigines in Australia, whose culture is 60,000 years old.

Genesis 4 even explains how God considered the blood and lives of his direct created “Homo Theocraticus”  in Eden his personal property as a special possession.

Learn all you can about “Punctuated Evolution”, then substitute the term “Punctuated Creation”

Then TEST your conclusions against the Bible. They should be consistent.

It’s like the Genesis account of Creation. It makes no sense from a Space based reference point, but from an observer standing on the Earth, it does.

(  … assuming you already understand the last 4 billion or so years of Earth’s geological and atmospheric development …)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.