Jump to content
The World News Media

Jehovah's Witnesses sue the Netherlands state for discrimination


Srecko Sostar

Recommended Posts

  • Member

WTJWorg is a very strange creation. They preach that they will be "persecuted" by world authorities, institutions and other people who "hate" them because of Jesus and that this is one of the proofs that they are the true religion. On the other hand, they don't want to be "persecuted", so they constantly go to court and file lawsuits more and more frequently. They are absurd in their theology and in the way they try to solve their problems.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 1.1k
  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well, in order to get the straight story and an accurate explanation of what is going on, simply go to the JW. org website and read the current news about this. Let’s ALL of us curious about this

Do you think it would have benefited the victim and lawyer back then, as it does now? This is also a guess by former members who have argued it over the internet. How many governments allow you

WTJWorg is not government!   A marriage between Tamara and Amnon would be incest by today's moral standards. In the culture of the Jews of that time, it would have been normal. Rape is ano

Posted Images

  • Member

Understanding the perpetual struggle between good and evil is crucial for those who may mistakenly equate justice with divine will. For guidance on this matter, Ephesians 6:12 is recommended. While this concept may not resonate with everyone, it holds significant weight, as highlighted in 1 Corinthians 9:25.

The Dutch government's attempt to restrict the activities of the Watchtower organization is unjust and warrants legal action. It is essential to fully recount the ongoing conflicts between governments and Jehovah's Witnesses without diluting the narrative. The parallels between the repression witnessed in Nazi Germany and the current situations in Russia and other parts of the world, where the proclamation of the gospel is suppressed, must be highlighted.

It is both unjust and deceitful for certain governments to exploit children as mere tools for negotiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, George88 said:

The Dutch government's attempt to restrict the activities of the Watchtower organization is unjust and warrants legal action.

What you write is incorrect. The government deals with victims of pedophilia because WTJWorg does not deal with the needs of JW victims within its own ranks, but deals with making the Organization look like the best religion.

You forget that Richard Asche stated in a deposition that WTJWorg is concerned with the spiritual protection of its members, and that government institutions should be concerned with the physical protection of JWs.
Apparently, JW elders are not trained to provide emotional and psychological help and any other professional support to victims of pedophilia. Victims in the Netherlands gave their statements confirming that WTJWorg has no ability or willingness to provide professional help to victims.

Given that WTJWorg publications very often speak against "secular" institutions of any kind and do not encourage their members to seek the help of psychologists or psychiatrists in hospital institutions, it is clear that the objection made by WTJWorg is unjustified and hypocritical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
3 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

What you write is incorrect. The government deals with victims of pedophilia because WTJWorg does not deal with the needs of JW victims within its own ranks, but deals with making the Organization look like the best religion.

This assumption is incorrect because the government is denying a subsidy to a specific religion, which benefits other religions that do not have the same bylaws imposed on them. Therefore, the unjustified and hypocritical stance only lies with the former members.

Nevertheless, ex-members persistently refuse to accept the historical realities of the Watchtower. They sound the alarm not only to their members, cautioning them about the potential pitfalls that arise when relying on any individual's behavior, but also to the wider public, making sure that the truth is widely known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Here is something for your contemplation.

*** g91 10/8 p. 4 The Secret Wounds of Child Abuse ***
The Secret Wounds of Child Abuse

 

Take a good look at the article and the DATE it was published, before and after the more recent activities by the government. Perhaps had they paid attention to some of the Watchtower articles, they might have done something about it sooner, and not when the U.N. made it a political sticking point in 2013.

Then after you read the article, refute it if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
10 minutes ago, George88 said:

Here is something for your contemplation.

*** g91 10/8 p. 4 The Secret Wounds of Child Abuse ***
The Secret Wounds of Child Abuse

 

Take a good look at the article and the DATE it was published, before and after the more recent activities by the government. Perhaps had they paid attention to some of the Watchtower articles, they might have done something about it sooner, and not when the U.N. made it a political sticking point in 2013.

Then after you read the article, refute it if you can.

The article you presented cites many secular sources, hence the "human perspective", which WTJWorg alarms its members against, in general.

A few Bible quotes do not make WTJWorg an expert on child abuse. You have not actually contributed any arguments that would elevate the "spiritual help" of the Society over the professional help provided by a professional secular institution.

The Bible does not even mention what types of violence against children were known, visible in biblical times. Nowhere (as far as I know) does the Bible explicitly condemn (sexual or other) violence against children, nor does it give specific insight into how such children can be helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
28 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

but victims of pedophilia who became ex-JWs due to treatment within the congregation.

I am leaning towards placing my trust in what you say. Many individuals believe they have suffered injustices 30 years later and are now seeking compensation with the help of highly skilled lawyers. Why didn't they take action earlier instead of waiting until the dollar sign appeared? The situation is truly disheartening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
17 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

The article you presented cites many secular sources, hence the "human perspective", which WTJWorg alarms its members against, in general.

If researchers were able to investigate and provide solutions for understanding the problem in 1991, why didn't the governments do the same?

21 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

A few Bible quotes do not make WTJWorg an expert on child abuse. You have not actually contributed any arguments that would elevate the "spiritual help" of the Society over the professional help provided by a professional secular institution.

The same can be said about you and the government. What would be your point about this comment?

22 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

The Bible does not even mention what types of violence against children were known, visible in biblical times. Nowhere (as far as I know) does the Bible explicitly condemn (sexual or other) violence against children, nor does it give specific insight into how such children can be helped

What age do you think Tamar was when Amnon violated her? There is a belief that even at the age of 18, people in ancient times would still be regarded as children. I find it hard to believe that Tamar was actually that old. However, my true outrage lies with the actions of Amnon and the instigator, Jonadab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
30 minutes ago, George88 said:

I am leaning towards placing my trust in what you say. Many individuals believe they have suffered injustices 30 years later and are now seeking compensation with the help of highly skilled lawyers. Why didn't they take action earlier instead of waiting until the dollar sign appeared? The situation is truly disheartening.

Certainly one can have a conversation about that, why didn't they sue WTJWorg earlier.

16 minutes ago, George88 said:

If researchers were able to investigate and provide solutions for understanding the problem in 1991, why didn't the governments do the same?

We can guess. But we can speculate as to why WTJWorg has secret files on perpetrators and victims that go back even further (as much as 70 years). They have not published any articles about it or what they have done to help the children.

21 minutes ago, George88 said:

What age do you think Tamar was when Amnon violated her? There is a belief that even at the age of 18, people in ancient times would still be regarded as children. I find it hard to believe that Tamar was actually that old. However, my true outrage lies with the actions of Amnon and the instigator, Jonadab.

At that time, close relatives could marry (in young age too), as is evident from Tamara's words. Today, they would call it incest or similar. 
Furthermore, Absalom kept secret what happened and did not allow Tamara to report the crime to the "authorities". A long-standing practice of JW elders. Here they found a pattern of behavior?

Absalom (the third party) takes matters into his own hands after two years. Why did he wait so long? He had his reasons.

Why are you surprised that the modern victim stifles the event within herself because very often she does not have the support of others in the congregation or even in the family, so she decides years later to disclose the facts to the police and the court.

Jonadab is a trickster like some JW religious leaders today. What is there to be surprised about. David could have had information about the event, which I have no doubt, but he did nothing. It is significant from the question in paragraph 26; Then Absalom said, “If not, please let my brother Amnon go with us.” And the king said to him, “Why should he go with you?”

So, again, a historical example, pattern of how they (GB) can  "biblically legalize" similar acts today in WTJWorg at the highest levels of church authority. Hush up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.