Forum participants we have known

[JW Insider]

5 minutes ago, George88 said:

. . . who have departed from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some.

For the record, I do not claim that the resurrection has already taken place. That's part of the 1914 doctrine.

[George88]

@Pudgy

That would be a false statement. If people get banned for telling the truth that it's hard to hear from disgruntled individuals then whoever is pressing the button to "protect" people here is ON YOU!

[Pudgy]

… not to worry …. I am fully gruntled.

AND your absurd premises of shifting blame for continuous nastiness was transparent YEARS sgo, Georgie.

[George88]

9 minutes ago, JW Insider said:

For the record, I do not claim that the resurrection has already taken place. That's part of the 1914 doctrine.

"When did I post that? Or is it a manipulated piece to prompt a response from you? I know you have the power to add or erase other people's comments. Could this be one of those instances, or was it taken from another post? Such actions would indicate fraud and deception."

[Pudgy]

…

[Pudgy]

You REALLY need to take a “Reading Comprehension” course, Georgie.

What part of “… for the record…” did you not understand?

[Pudgy]

39 minutes ago, George88 said:

"When did I post that? Or is it a manipulated piece to prompt a response from you? I know you have the power to add or erase other people's comments. Could this be one of those instances, or was it taken from another post? Such actions would indicate fraud and deception.   I would figure it out, but I REALLY need to take a reading comprehension course, and I am being spied on by a duck with binoculars.”

 

[George88]

14 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

If humanity has been "alienated from God" since the fall of Adam and Eve and if this world is "ruled by Satan", then there is no "Biblical chronology" od "God's chronology" but only "Satanic chronology". lol

This is Srecko's argument, which is only applicable in a fantasy world, LOL! Star Trek will do.

[Pudgy]

So … what about the duck?

[JW Insider]

3 hours ago, George88 said:

"When did I post that?

You posted it just a matter of a minute or so before I quoted it. Surprised you didn't remember posting it just a minute earlier. It was part of what you said here, quoting the scripture. I'll highlight it in red:

3 hours ago, George88 said:

To those who have left their faith, the words of scripture no longer hold meaning. But should those who represent God hold the same belief?

2 Timothy 2:14-4:5 New International Version
Dealing With False Teachers
14 Keep reminding God’s people of these things. Warn them before God against quarreling about words; it is of no value, and only ruins those who listen. 15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. 16 Avoid godless chatter, because those who indulge in it will become more and more ungodly. 17 Their teaching will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, 18 who have departed from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some. 19 Nevertheless, God’s solid foundation stands firm, sealed with this inscription: “The Lord knows those who are his,” and, “Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness.”

f

[JW Insider]

6 hours ago, George88 said:

Or is it a manipulated piece to prompt a response from you? I know you have the power to add or erase other people's comments. Could this be one of those instances, or was it taken from another post? Such actions would indicate fraud and deception."

No. It suspect it was just an issue with your memory. No biggie. We are all getting a bit older every day. No need to be paranoid about a manipulated piece. I don't do that. I have the power to delete comments, but I don't have the power to "add" them, LOL. Since there are none of those instances, it couldn't be one of them. Besides, even if I really had made a mistake and taken it from another post, it wouldn't be fraud and deception. It would have just been a mistake. 

In this case it was your mistake, not mine, but I am not so paranoid or anxious to accuse others so as to think it would have been fraud or deception. I do think it's a matter of "wishful thinking" on your part, though. You probably "wish" you could accuse me of fraud and deception and actually find evidence for that, even if you have to grasp at straws to do it. This is the same danger I have been talking about when promoting teachings with no evidence, or very weak and faulty evidence. People are always willing to grasp at straws to try to sow doubt on the evidence that doesn't fit their agenda, or they try the old standby ad hominem against the person presenting it.  

This is exactly what I wish would change. And of course you will continue with the accusations because, if you are anything like your other personas here, you never admit a mistake.

[George88]

41 minutes ago, JW Insider said:

ou posted it just a matter of a minute or so before I quoted it. Surprised you didn't remember posting it just a minute earlier. It was part of what you said here, quoting the scripture. I'll highlight it in red:

Oh Okay, it has to do with you making up things, got it, since none of that has to do with your remark. Perhaps you had something different in mind, and your recollection might be faltering, but it's perfectly natural.