Jump to content
The World News Media

More Jehovah's Witnesses' materials added to extremist list

Guest Kurt

Recommended Posts

  • Guest



SOVA Center for News and Analysis, 14 June 2016
On 14 June 2016 it was learned from another update of the Federal List of Extremist Materials that on 19 February 2016 a Serov district court of Sverdlovsk province banned two publications of Jehovah's Witnesses. These were a brochure, "Listen to God,' and an issue of the magazine Awake for January 2015 with a lead article "How did life appear?".
"Listen to God" is a small book with colorful illustrations whose entire text consists of brief quotations from the Bible in the New World Translation, that is, the Russian translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses. The forbidden issue of the magazine Awake covers the question of the appearance of life from the point of view of the Jehovah's Witnesses and it also describes the unique shape of a honey comb, gives advice on restraining anger and answers to questions about the implication of God in the sufferings of people, and publishes brief news about Costa Rica and an interview with a sick girl. The reasons for banning the publication are unknown to us, but we note that in both there is a reference to the website of the Jehovah's Witnesses, which was prohibited in Russia.
We consider the ban of these two publications for extremism to be illegal. We consider in general finding publications of Jehovah's Witnesses and prosecution of believers for their distribution to be religious discrimination.
Previously, in the autumn of 2015, a former founder of the local religious organization in Serov was fined for possession of extremist materials for the purpose of mass distribution. A warning about the impermissibility of extremist activity was issued to the congregation and the Jehovah's Witnesses did not succeed in appealing its legality in court.


Jehovah's Witness fined for civil offense


Prosecutor's office of Bryansk province, 16 June 2016
The prosecutor's office of the city of Klintsy on a continuing basis conducts monitoring of compliance with the law on combating extremist activity.
It was established that in April 2016 in the city of Klintsy a 43-year-old local woman resident distributed the book "What does the Bible really teach?," which is included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
Because of this the city prosecutor opened a case against the woman for the administrative violation of the law provided for by article 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Violations of Law of the RF (production and dissemination of extremist materials).
By a ruling of the Klintsy city court of Bryansk province, the defendant was held administratively accountable in the form of a fine.
The court's ruling has not taken legal effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 1.9k
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
    • In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some.
    • Would it be too much to ask what was the bible students starting point of creation?
    • @JW Insider Your summary is irrelevant, as I do not make any assertions regarding BC/AD other than their usage by scholars and in history, as you yourself have also acknowledged on numerous occasions, thus rendering your point invalid and evasive. The Watchtower leverages external viewpoints, including secular evidence, to substantiate the accuracy of their chronological interpretations. There are numerous approaches to dating events. Personally, I explore various alternative methods that lead to the same conclusion as the Watchtower. However, the most captivating approach is to utilize secular chronology to arrive at the same outcome. By relying solely on secular chronology, the pattern still aligns, albeit with a distinct interpretation of the available data. Nevertheless, the ultimate result remains unchanged. This is why when you get upset, when you are proven wrong, you, Tom, and those with the authority to ban take action, because you like others cannot handle the truth. In this case, your infamous tablet VAT 4956 has become useless in this situation. I do agree with you on one thing: you are not an expert, just like COJ. However, I must admit that this foolish individual was not the first to debate the chronology with the Watchtower and abandon it based on personal beliefs. He simply happened to be the most recent one that's on record.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.