Jump to content
The World News Media

REMARRIED ACTRESS, CLARION CHUKWURAH CHANGES CHURCH, NOW A JEHOVAH'S WITNESS (PIC)

Guest Nicole

By Guest Nicole
in Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

This will come as a rude shock to many of her fans that top Nollywood actress Clarion Chukwurah has abandoned her faith and converted to a new one.
The newly married actress of 51 years has joined the Jehovah Witness. This it was gathered is her husband Anthony Boyd’s religion and thus since she is married to him she has converted to his faith. The couple shared photos of them in their meeting.

The veteran thespian shared her photo and that of her husband on her Facebook after meeting and captioned it:
“An Instructive Meeting Sunday at the King

Source: https://www.naij.com/888465-renowned-actress-clarion-chukwurah-converts-new-religion-photos.html?f&poster=12120

vllkyt3c5hjeop52g.1a3814ca.jpg

 

See also:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 17.2k
  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Queen Esther

Not  just  easy  for  such  of  persons !  I  appreciate  what  she  was  doing.  Yes,  come  to  Jehovah,  still  HE  is  giving  time....   We  don't  know  how  long  HE  will  do  it.  The  end-ti

Ifeacho Solomon

hmmm interesting

Posted Images

  • 2 months later...
  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

Loved up photos of actress, hubby emerges

New photos of the couple show them all loved up posing for the camera at the Indian Springs State Park.

 

pulse-clarion-chukwurah-wedding.jpg

Veteran Nollywood actress Clarion Chukwurah who walked down the aisle with her US based lover Anthony Boyd.

And ever since then the both of them have never looked back!

clarion-and-hubby.jpg

New photos of the couple show them all loved up posing for the camera at the Indian Springs State Park.

We are so happy for them. Old and in love....

clarion-and-hubby1.jpg

Meanwhile, the actress who got married to her U.S. based boyfriend in a small and intimate outdoors ceremony took to Facebook on July 10, 2016 sharing a photo of herself with her husband at the Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses.

Apparently the veteran has joined her husband's faith, Jehovah's Witnesses. "An Instructive Meeting Sunday at the Kingdom Hall towards Baptism and Evangelization Ministry as Jehovah’s Witnesses,” she captioned the post.

pulse-clarion-chukwurah-wedding3.jpg

The veteran who got married for the third time had her last break-up being with socialite, Femi Oduneye, also known as 'Femi Egyptian' whom she married on February 14, 2004, but ended up as an on and off relationship.

She also once had a relationship with afro-juju legend, Sir Shina Peters who got her knocked-up in an affair that brought about the birth of musical video director, Clarence Peters.

http://pulse.ng/celebrities/clarion-chukwurah-loved-up-photos-of-actress-hubby-emerges-id5591282.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

Veteran Actress, Clarion Chukwurah Is All About Love With Her New Husband, Anthony

clarion-and-hsband.png

Veteran Nollywood actress Clarion Chukwurah recently got married to  her US-based lover Anthony Boyd and the duo are currently on what we could call a honeymoon.

They’ve been spotted at the Times Square in New York before moving to Lanham-Seabrook, Maryland.

Meanwhile, the actress who got married to her U.S. based boyfriend in a small and intimate outdoors ceremony took to Facebook on July 10, 2016 sharing a photo of herself with her husband at the Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

https://www.informationng.com/2017/03/veteran-actress-clarion-chukwurah-love-new-husband-anthony.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pudgy
      A Proclamation on Transgender Day of Visibility, 2024

      By Pudgy · Posted

      … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • Mic Drop
      The Ethereum Cryptocurrency Scam

      By Mic Drop · Posted

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  

  • Members

    • Mark Watson

      Mark Watson 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BGR

      BGR 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.