Jump to content
The World News Media

Multan a los Testigos de Jehová por robar datos de médicos y pacientes


Guest Indiana

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Indiana

Nuevo varapalo para los Testigos de Jehová. La Agencia de Protección de Datos ha multado al culto religioso con10.000 euros por recopilar datos de médicos y pacientes sin autorización previa.

A través de unos Comités de Enlance con los Hospitales, equipos de Testigos de Jehová encargados de estas labores en cada provincia, se dedicaban a hablar con los médicos para ver quiénes estaban dispuestos a operar sin sangre, tal y como establece su religión, que prohíbe cualquier tratamiento médico, como transfusiones, que sea mediante sangre. 

Captura.JPG

denuncia-resolucion-testigos-jehova.pdf

Recurso

Los Testigos de Jehová han presentado un recurso tras el fallo administrativo, pero no ha sido aceptada. Esto significa que deberán abonar los 10.000 euros por recopilación sin autorización de datos de galenos y pacientes.

Fragmento del capítulo 'Pastoreen el rebaño de Dios"

La multa responde a una infracción del artículo 6.1 de la Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13/12, de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal (LOPD), tipificada como grave. 

El personal sanitario, así como los pacientes, no habían dado su consentimiento expreso para que se recopilara su información personal así como otros datos administrativos.

Libro de los ancianos

En la versión más actualizada del libro de los líderes religiosos de los Testigos de Jehová, de 2019, habla sobre la función de estos Comités de enlace.

Directriz para la atención médica

En el libro explican la utilidad de la tarjeta para que sus fieles puedan transmitir a los médicos su opción religiosa para no recibir tratamientos con sangre. En la teoría, todo es regular. Pero en la práctica han ido demasiado lejos en su empresa y ahora se han visto obligados a rendir cuentas.

https://cronicaglobal.elespanol.com/vida/multan-testigos-jehova-robar-datos-medicos-pacientes_221865_102.html

denuncia-resolucion-testigos-jehova.pdf

atencion-medica-testigos-jehova.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 4.9k
  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Guest
Guest Indiana

Multa de la AEPD a los Testigos de Jehová por robar datos médicos

Nuevo golpe para los Testigos de Jehová.

La Agencia de Protección de Datos ha multado al culto religioso con 10.000 euros por recopilar datos de médicos y pacientes sin autorización previa.

ACCESO A DATOS DE SALUD SIN CONSENTIMIENTO
A través de unos Comités de Enlace con los Hospitales, equipos de Testigos de Jehová encargados de estas labores en cada provincia, se dedicaban a hablar con los médicos para confirmar si estaban dispuestos a operar sin sangre, de acuerdo a lo que indica su religión, que prohíbe cualquier tratamiento médico, como transfusiones, que sea mediante sangre.

Sin embargo, al recoger estos datos se extralimitaban de sus funciones, recabando información de diversa naturaleza sobre los pacientes, pero sin pedir el permiso pertinente que estipula la ley.

Recordemos que el RGPD establece la obligatoriedad de disponer de un consentimiento expreso de los afectados para poder tratar sus datos personales.

O, si no, tener un interés legítimo para ello. Algo que en este supuesto no existe.

Recurso de los Testigos de Jehová
Los Testigos de Jehová han presentado un recurso tras el fallo administrativo, pero no ha sido aceptado.

Esto significa que deberán abonar los 10.000 euros por recopilación sin autorización de datos de galenos y pacientes.

La multa responde a una infracción de la normativa de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal, tipificada como grave.

Ni los pacientes ni el personal sanitario habían otorgado su consentimiento expreso para que se recogiera su información personal así como otros datos administrativos.

Hace unos meses la organización religiosa fue condenada también en EE.UU. a pagar 35 millones de dólares por abusos sexuales.

Libro de ancianos
En la versión más actualizada del libro de los líderes religiosos de los Testigos de Jehová, de 2019, habla sobre la función de estos Comités de enlace.

En el libro explican la utilidad de la tarjeta para que sus fieles puedan transmitir a los médicos su opción religiosa para no recibir tratamientos con sangre. En la teoría, todo es regular.

Pero en la práctica han ido demasiado lejos en su empresa y ahora se han visto obligados a rendir cuentas.

https://ayudaleyprotecciondatos.es/2019/02/14/multa-aepd-robar-datos-medicos/

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just once I’d like to see a Pharma ad in which the actors, rather than acting out the touted benefits of the drug, instead act out the side effects of the voiceover—gasping, clutching their throats, turning blue, hair falling out, doubling over, dropping dead, straining on the toilet to ‘go’, swiveling about in dizziness.
    • Journalists who go rogue often do it for me. https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust RFKjr is turning out a fine source as well. Look how he says 60 years ago most people (80%) trusted government and now 90% do not: https://x.com/vigilantfox/status/1777710201937732085?s=61&t=fM8K_zHB-Zw9l_mM_4QHqg
    • My overall point is that most Witnesses I know in the United States are very political and don't even know it. Often much more political than their neighbors who vote. There are certain limits to what we will say about our political views, but I think we don't recognize that those political views often come out inadvertently in other ways. In fact, I've seen strong political views among Witnesses who only use the line "we don't take sides in politics" when they wish to shut down an argument they disagree with. My parents and many relatives were of the type that said they wouldn't be fooled by all the lies and exaggerations from MS-NBC supposedly on the "progressive left." Nor the lies and exaggerations from FOX News on the supposedly "conservative right." But that didn't stop them from being fooled by thinking that CNN was not mostly "state-sponsored media" that would cherry-pick stories now and then to keep up the ruse that they weren't. As long as they continued to support corporate sponsors, including "Big Pharma" and "Big Military Industrial Complex," it was clear what side they were going to take. And although Trump was golden to all networks for his ability to spout controversy, one of his biggest sins for CNN was the fact that he went 4 years without getting the USA involved in any new wars.  We were watching CNN once, not on purpose, and although many segments were introduced with "Brought to you by Pfizer" one was introduced "Brought to you by McDonnell-Douglas." As if any of us watching were about to go out and buy McDonnell-Douglas fighter jets and missiles for accessories. Of course, even the segments brought to you by Pfizer weren't really for any of us to be swayed in our pharmacy choices, either. As with all corporate media, those ads are really just payments to CNN; they are all just a way for corporations to PAY (bribe) the news writers and commentators to realize on which side their bread is buttered. They are merely buying influence. ---- All this was probably just my own rationale to excuse my own tendency to throw in opinions about politics, politicians, and the mainstream corporate media. There are no easy answer to how someone should go about getting their news, or how to feed their own opinions. But I would be happy to hear about the various sources people use when trying to find the "truth" about various world events. 
    • Here was the general conversation, skipping a part where I had just explained how 30,000 Palestinians, largely women and children, had been killed, and the majority of major news outlets were still equivocating about whether Israel had gone too far. But when mostly "white" aid workers were killed, suddenly Nancy Pelosi (friend of the aid organization founder), Joe Scarborough, Elizabeth Warren, and a bunch of others turn on a dime to stop giving Israel a free pass -- embarrassing their own man Biden.  THEM: Well, anyway, we don't take sides about literal Israel, and we don't discuss political sides of who supports whom. ME: But that last part is just information, even history. THEM: History is one thing but the Bible says don't speak against the King. What's that it says in Ecclesiastes? (Ecclesiastes 10:20) . . .Even in your thoughts, do not curse the king, and do not curse the rich in your bedroom; for a bird may convey the sound, or a creature with wings may repeat what was said. ME: Yeah. That's where we get the expression: "a little birdie told me." Basically, it means that someone on Twitter will turn you in. Or all the government agencies will be listening in on Twitter.   THEM: Very funny. You mean "X." ME: Yeah, but they still call them "tweets." THEM: But still we don't take sides, we don't even say anything against any ruler, whether he's good or bad. We only pray that they make decisions that are good for us.  ME: I don't think it's wrong to say something against a ruler. Don't you think Hitler was a bad ruler? THEM: But he's not a king now is he? He's dead. ME: I mean even when he was alive. THEM: Well, of course, because he was attacking Jehovah's people. ME: But it would have been wrong to say he was bad while he was attacking millions of Jews? THEM: [changing subject] But look how respectful Paul was talking to Felix, he never said a word against him. ME: Maybe not, but Luke tells us he was probably looking for a bribe. That's pretty negative. ME: continuing . . . And Jesus called Herod a fox. THEM: Well maybe he was "foxy" -- "crafty" not always a bad thing. ME: You don't believe that . . . and even if it was a good thing, then Jesus was taking sides. THEM: Anyway . . . it's wrong.
    • The conversation went like this: ME: I'm just now seeing the new article on the front of jw.org, about whether Bible prophecy points to literal Israel. That seems to be on everyone's mind. THEM: Absolutely. One of my studies just asked that question and I went through the usual scriptures, especially Galatians  6. I hadn't seen the article yet. I wish I had. ME: Yes, the article uses Matthew 23:37 "your house is abandoned to you" and Galatians 6, and Romans 11. THEM: I think I used Romans 11, too.  ME: I just noticed that the article says one thing that might be confusing though. “A dulling of sensibilities has happened in part to Israel until the full number of people of the nations has come in, and in this manner all Israel will be saved.” (Romans 11:25, 26) . . . By the expression “all Israel,” Paul meant all of spiritual Israel. ME: continuing . . . Actually, I don't think that will make sense to most people though. I mean, ultimately, yes, it's spiritual Israel that is saved. We know that from Galatians 6, but in this context people are going to notice that Paul actually was speaking about the two olive trees and the LITERAL Gentiles getting grafted into the tree representing LITERAL Israel.  THEM: But it means all of spiritual Israel will be saved. ME: That's the only way it works out in the long run, yes. But doesn't it make more sense that as many of literal Israel as possible get saved because it's these people of the nations who now have Jehovah's blessing, and this makes some of natural Israel jealous? And that helps lead to the salvation of as many natural Israelites as possible. (Romans 11:11) etc., etc. Who is right on this point is not important here, it's the next part of the conversation. Next post . . . 
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,398

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dennis

      dennis 1

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.2k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,678
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    James Hume
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.