Jump to content
The World News Media

Is it appropriate for minors to get baptized?


Evacuated

Recommended Posts

  • Member

@Ann O'Maly Unfortunately you are digging into motive that cannot possibly be known from the information provided. You present an unproven and emotive claim as fact, and then draw conclusions based on that assumption. You also appear to be fuelling the fire of controversy with a statement about dedication/commitment to an Organisation

To  assert such an assessment of motive on the basis of a video that describes briefly an interaction between two persons unknown (to me) about an incident not witnessed (by me) is a step too far (for me). 

All I see (from the videos you cite) is a father exercising his parental right to withhold an maturity related privilege. I cannot accept your extrapolation of motive and strategy without actually speaking to the parties involved and assessing the event, the motives, the understanding, the outcomes etc,  What you are doing reminds me of Ahasuerus wrongly interpreting the intentions of Haman at Esther 7:8.

Obviously, bribing or coercing minors to dedicate themselves to Jehovah to obtain a drivers permit is unacceptable. It is also stupid, as it would render void that dedication anyway. On that basis alone, your interpretation of Anthony Morris's intention in relating this matter seems to me (on face value at least) highly implausible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 3k
  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I can see that.  You agree that getting married has lesser gravity in the great universal scheme of things than baptism, right? What if you overheard this conversation between a father and h

That's because the discussion wasn't about a minor prioritizing working toward dedication over seeking a driving permit. The discussion was about a JW father withholding his child's driving permit to

Actually, Watchtower no 3 for 2016 has two study articles which set out Jehovah's Witnesses view on this matter quite clearly. https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/watchtower-study-march-

Posted Images

  • Member

OK, OK. Enough of our ping-pong 'Yes he does' / 'No he doesn't.' To me, AMIII's words and intent are as plain as day. You disagree. However, we can agree on this:

6 hours ago, Eoin Joyce said:

Obviously, bribing or coercing minors to dedicate themselves to Jehovah to obtain a drivers permit is unacceptable. It is also stupid, as it would render void that dedication anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Member

uj.PNG

Escondido, California, USA - A Jehovah's WItness father looks down on his smiling daughter as he baptizes her.

Later she will potentially be disfellowshipped from the congregation and her entire life will be thrown into chaos because she supposedly made this choice of her own volition.

Ask yourself, Can a minor legally enter a contract?

All minors baptized and later disfellowshipped that have received damages may one day decide to form a class action lawsuit against the Jehovah's Witnesses after a court decides to "pierce the corporate veil" by allowing suits against the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania as the controlling corporation above many subsidiaries which is ultimately controlled by the Governing Body itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Member
On 10/3/2016 at 0:15 AM, Jay Witness said:

All minors baptized and later disfellowshipped that have received damages may one day decide to form a class action lawsuit against the Jehovah's Witnesses

I don't know how feasible that would be legally and without encroaching on the 1st amendment. If somebody was baptized as a minor and disfellowshipped as an adult, couldn't it be argued that, as an adult, that person ratified their earlier contract by willingly submitting to congregation rules, consenting to have data held on them (e.g. report slips), accepting privileges, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

 

 

 

Considering baptism, if the organization truly is not viewed equal to God, why is one baptized into the organization?  This is where the problem arises not only with children, but with everyone who is baptized into it. 

 

Referring to the baptism of children, the Insight Vol 1 says,

It is true that Jesus said: “Stop hindering [the young children] from coming to me, for the kingdom of the heavens belongs to suchlike ones.” (Mt 19:13-15; Mr 10:13-16) But they were not baptized. Jesus blessed them, and there is nothing to indicate that his laying his hands upon them was a religious ceremony. He further showed that the reason ‘the kingdom of God belongs to such’ was not because they were baptized but because they were teachable and trusting. Christians are commanded to be “babes as to badness,” yet “full-grown in powers of understanding.”Mt 18:4; Lu 18:16, 17; 1Co 14:20. 

 

Can anyone make judgment that a child has reached this point when each one of us should strive continually to reach and remain full-grown in powers of understanding? To be full-grown in powers of understanding takes diligent effort on the part of an adult.

“The second question asks the candidate, first of all, if he understands that his baptism serves to identify him as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. After undergoing immersion, he becomes an ordained minister who bears Jehovah’s name. This is both a great privilege and a serious responsibility. It also puts the one baptized in line for eternal salvation, provided he remains faithful to Jehovah.—Matthew 24:13.

Bearing God’s name is not literal, but through one’s actions in imitation of Christ’s loyalty and love toward God’s will in Truth, not through man’s doctrine.   The identity as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses is thought as bearing God’s name, when in reality one bears the name of an organization.   Would a child of 7,8 even up to 14 or so, understand what lies behind this statement, or the serious responsibility this dedication involves?

The second question also reminds the candidate of his responsibility to work with Jehovah’s spirit-directed organization..”  ‘Go and Make Disciples, Baptizing Them’ - The Watchtower—2006

It cannot be dismissed that the reason for changing the second baptism question asked on the day of baptism is to protect, not the individual, but the organization; thus, whether a child is baptized, matters little. The organization’s interests are paramount. 

“Do you understand that your dedication and baptism identify you as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses in association with God’s spirit-directed organization?”

What does an organization have to do with following Jesus’ command, which is to baptized in the names of those we are to worship?  Dedication – our vow - to God cannot be shared with anything. (Isa 40:25; Exod 20:4)  If a parent is encouraging a child toward baptism within the organization, they are teaching a message contrary to God’s will. Isa 2:22; Ps 146:3; Rev 13:8 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isa+2%3A22%3B+Ps+146%3A3%3B+Rev+13%3A8++&version=NKJV

 If dedication and loyalty were not expected toward the organization, the baptism vows would never have received an adjustment from this:

Have you recognized yourself as a sinner and needing salvation from Jehovah God? And have you acknowledged that this salvation proceeds from him and through his ransomer, Christ Jesus?

On the basis of this faith in God and in his provision for redemption have you dedicated yourself unreservedly to Jehovah God, to do his will henceforth as that will is revealed to you through Christ Jesus and through God's Word as his holy spirit makes it plain? May 15, 1970 Watchtower, p. 309

But, they have been scaled down in a most corporate way to cover the basics – slam, dunk and you’re done.  On the other hand, the disfellowshipping procedure is quite involved.  After a seven day appeal period previous to one announced as disfellowshipped,

”The coordinator of the body of elders should check the announcement (disfellowship) to make sure that it conforms to the guidelines outlined by the organization.  An elder should read the announcement.  The wording should be as follows:  “(Name of person) is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses”  

The judicial committee should promptly inform the branch office of the disfellowshipping using the appropriate forms. When making the report, read and carefully follow the instructions on the form.

  Upon conclusion of the case, the chairman should place only necessary notes and documents, a detailed summary of the case, and the S-77 forms in a sealed envelope for the congregation’s confidential file.  Elders on the committee should preserve nothing outside of this sealed envelope (including personal notes).  On the outside of the envelope should be written the wrongdoer’s name, the names of those who served on the judicial committee (with the chairman indicated), the actions take, and the date of the action.”  Page 101  Shepherding the Flock of God

How much more corporate, without compassion and sterile, can one get?

From an article entitled “An Aspect of the Legalism of Jehovah's Witnesses”:

"Note that the above legalese (please read from the link below) says that once a person joins the Witnesses, he has only two choices if he wants to leave: disfellowshipping and disassociation. These two choices are enforced by American law. However, even if the Watchtower lawyer has correctly stated matters, he has neglected the case of the child who gets baptized and submits to "ecclesiastical law." By law minors cannot enter into legally binding contracts. Therefore by law, people who got baptized when they were children have a third legally enforceable option when they leave: to simply quit, without disassociating and without submitting to a judicial committee, or "ecclesiastical tribunal." Of course, the Society will not tell people about this."  http://corior.blogspot.com/2006/02/aspect-of-legalism-of-jehovahs.html

An identity to any affiliation is a mental and emotional mark that one bears. The early apostles and believers of Christ bore only the identity required by God and in imitation of His Son, and for that, they were persecuted.  Deut 6:8; 1 Pet 2:21; Mark 8:35; Rom 6:5; Heb 13:13 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deut+6%3A8%3B+1+Pet+2%3A21%3B+Mark+8%3A35%3B+Rom+6%3A5%3B+Heb+13%3A13+&version=NKJV

Any other spiritual identity one agrees to accept, is idolatry and a spiritual commerce, based on slavery.  Rom 6:16; Gal 1:10; Rev 13:16,8,17; Isa 55:1 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rom+6%3A16%3B+Gal+1%3A10%3B+Rev+13%3A16%2C8%2C17%3B+Isa+55%3A1 &version=NKJV

No man is given authority to judge our hearts, but an earthly organization boasts that it can, under the illusion that it belongs to God.  Ps 139:23; Jer 17:10; Acts 1:24; Rom 8:27; Deut 8:2; 1 Chron 29:17; Micah 7:18; Ezek 3:21; 33:14-16; 2 Chron 7:14; Ezek 18:23; 33:19  https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ps+139%3A23%3B+Jer+17%3A10%3B+Acts+1%3A24%3B+Rom+8%3A27%3B+Deut+8%3A2%3B+1+Chron+29%3A17%3B+Micah+7%3A18%3B+Ezek+3%3A21%3B+33%3A14-16%3B+2+Chron+7%3A14%3B+Ezek+18%3A23%3B+33%3A19++&version=NKJV

 When one rejects this man given authority, and instead chooses to imitate Christ fully; they, too, are persecuted. Matt 5:11,12; Rev 13:15-17 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matt+5%3A11%2C12%3B+Rev+13%3A15-17&version=NKJV

“God’s organization plays a vital role in our spiritual growth.  Like a mother who makes sure that her child is well-fed and cared for, “the faithful and discreet slave” provides an abundance of timely spiritual food for our spiritual advancement.” (w 06/4/1)

The king (FDS 1 Cor 4:8) is not saved by his great army (“The shepherds and dukes (or, “princes,” NEB) in this implausible army are the congregation elders.”)
    a warrior is not delivered by his great strength. (Zech 4:6)
17 The war horse (organization)is a false hope for salvation,
    and by its great might it cannot rescue.

18 Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear him,
    on those who hope in his steadfast love,
19 that he may deliver their soul from death
    and keep them alive in famine.

20 Our soul waits for the Lord;
    he is our help and our shield.
21 For our heart is glad in him,
    because we trust in his holy name.
22 Let your steadfast love, O Lord, be upon us,
    even as we hope in you. Ps 33:16-22

Baptism vows changing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely should try the Bond roll here when you get a chance: this is a mom and pop place that does a great job  
    • An interesting concept, bible discipline. I am struck by the prevalence of ignorance about spiritual discipline on "Reddit." While physical and mental disciplines receive attention, the profound impact of spiritual discipline on a person's physical and mental well-being is often overlooked. Is it possible to argue against the words of the Apostle Paul? When he penned those words in Hebrews 12, he was recognizing that there are moments when an individual must be "rebuked" in order to be corrected. Even Jesus himself established a precedent when he rebuked Peter and referred to him as Satan for failing to comprehend what Jesus had already revealed to the apostles. Did that imply that Jesus had an evil heart? Not at all, it was quite the opposite; Jesus had a loving heart. His need to correct Peter actually showcased his genuine love for him. If he hadn't cared, he would have let Peter persist in his mistaken ways, leading to a fate similar to Judas'. There is a clear emphasis on avoiding the apostate translation and its meaning, yet many seem to overlook the biblical foundation for the reasons NOT to follow the path of the fallen brethren or those with an apostate mentality. Those individuals have embraced the path of darkness, where the illuminating power of light cannot penetrate, to avoid receiving the righteous discipline based on God's Bible teachings. They are undoubtedly aware that this undeniable truth of life must be disregarded in order to uphold their baseless justifications for the unjust act of shunning. Can anyone truly "force" someone or stop them from rejecting a friend or family member? Such a notion would be absurd, considering the fact that we all have the power of free will. If a Witness decides to distance themselves from a family member or friend simply because they have come out as gay, who is anyone within the organization to question or challenge that personal sentiment? It is unfortunate that there are individuals, both within and outside the organization, who not only lack a proper understanding of the Bible but also dare to suggest that God's discipline is barbaric. We must remember that personal choices should be respected, and it is not for others to judge or condemn someone based on their sexual orientation but should be avoided under biblical grounds. No one should have the power to compel an individual to change their sexual orientation, nor should anyone be forced to accept someone for who they are. When it comes to a family's desire to shield their children from external influences, who has the right to challenge the parents' decision? And if a family's rejection of others is based on cultural factors rather than religious beliefs, who can impose religious judgment on them? Who should true followers of Christ follow? The words of God or those who believe they can change God's laws to fit their lives? How can we apply the inspired words of Paul from God to embrace the reality of God's discipline? On the contrary, how can nonconformists expect to persuade those with a "worldview" that their religious beliefs are unacceptable by ostracizing individuals, when God condemns homosexuality? This is precisely why the arguments put forth by ex-witnesses are lacking in their pursuit of justice. When they employ misguided tactics, justice remains elusive as their arguments are either weak or inconsistent with biblical standards. Therefore, it is crucial to also comprehend Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 9:27. The use of the word "shun" is being exaggerated and excessively condemned by those who reject biblical shunning as a form of punishment. Eph 5:3-14 NIV 3 But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people. 4 Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. 5 For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person — such a man is an idolater — has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.  6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God's wrath comes on those who are disobedient. 7 Therefore do not be partners with them.  8 For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) 10 and find out what pleases the Lord. 11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible. The impact of the message becomes significantly stronger when we emphasize the importance of avoiding any association with unrighteousness and those who remain unrepentant. In fact, it becomes even more compelling when we witness how some individuals, who dismiss biblical shunning as a method of discipline, excessively criticize and condemn the use of the word "shun". Therefore, Jehovah's Witnesses do not shun people; instead, they choose to focus on the negative actions being committed, which is in accordance with biblical teachings. This should be construed as ex-Witness rhetoric. Now, let's consider why ex-Witnesses specifically target one particular religion. What justifications do they provide when other Christian denominations also adhere to the same principle grounded in the Bible? Chapter 1 - Preface Both must therefore test themselves: the one, if he is qualified to speak and leave behind him written records; the other, if he is in a right state to hear and read: as also some in the dispensation of the Eucharist, according to  custom enjoin that each one of the people individually should take his part. One's own conscience is best for choosing accurately or shunning. And its firm foundation is a right life, with suitable instruction. But the imitation of those who have already been proved, and who have led correct lives, is most excellent for the understanding and practice of the commandments. "So that whosoever shall eat the bread and drink the cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  It therefore follows, that every one of those who undertake to promote the good of their neighbours, ought to consider whether he has betaken himself to teaching rashly and out of rivalry to any; if his communication of the word is out of vainglory; if the the only reward he reaps is the salvation of those who hear, and if he speaks not in order to win favour: if so, he who speaks by writings escapes the reproach of mercenary motives. "For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know," says the apostle, "nor a cloak of covetousness. God is witness. Nor of men sought we glory, neither of you, nor yet of others, when we might have been burdensome as the apostles of Christ. But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children."   (from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 2) Divine promises 2. The manner of shunning, in the word escaping. There is a flying away required, and that quickly, as in the plague, or from a fire which hath almost burned us, or a flood that breaketh in upon us. We cannot soon enough escape from sin (Matt 3:7; Heb 6:18). No motion but flight becomes us in this case. Doctrine: That the great end and effect of the promises of the gospel is to make us partakers of the Divine nature. (from The Biblical Illustrator)  
    • Clearly, they are already demanding your exile. Yes! It's unfortunate that Pudgy spoiled a great discussion about science. I hope the discussion can continue without any more nonsensical interruptions. Just a suggestion since they are on your heels. Wow! You speak! It seems you have a lot to say! Now they are going to treat like, who do you think you are, mister big stuff! Are those aliens now going to imply that anyone who speaks out against the five or six key contributors to this site will be treated as though it is George just because those in opposition speak the language they hate to hear, the TRUTH? They are seeking individuals who will embrace their nonconformist values and appreciate what they can offer in shaping public opinion contrary to the established agenda of God and Christ. Their goal is to enhance their writing abilities and avoid squandering time on frivolous pursuits, mainly arguing about the truth they don't care for. They see it all as a mere game, even when leading people astray. They believe they have every right to and will face no biblical repercussions, or so they believe. They just want to have fun just like that Cyndi Lauper song. Be prepared to be belittled and ridiculed, all the while they claim to be angels. Haha! By the way, please refrain from using the same language as George. They appear to believe that when others use the same words, it means they are the same person, and they emphasize this as if no one else is allowed to use similar grammar. It seems they think only they have the right to use the same or similar writing styles. Quite amusing, isn't it? See, what I just placed in bold, now I'm George, lol! Now, let's leave this nice science thread for people that want to know more about science. I believe George left it at "Zero Distance."  
  • Members

    • JAluse

      JAluse 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

    • lauleb  »  misette

      merci pour ton travail très utile. tu es une aide qui fortifie
      · 0 replies
    • Pamela Dunston  »  T.B. (Twyla)

      Hi, TB
      I would like to get the weekly meeting and watchtower materials  and the 2024 convention 
      Attend the 2024 Convention—“Declare the Good News!”
      notebook, I just recently got a new computer, If don't mind my brother to add me on and allow me access to our study again.
       
      Thank you, so much
      Sister Dunston
      · 1 reply
    • SpiritualSister 24  »  DARLENE2022

      Hello, Darlene, I just love your name, I had a cousin named Darline, and had a classmate also named Darlene! It's a pleasure to know another Darlene! Especially a Spiritual Sister! There's some websites, Ministry Ideaz , JW Stuff.com, and Etsy that I use to order my yearly buttons for the Conventions! They always send me what I order, and their also Jehovah's Witnesses, that send us the merchandise we order!  You can check out these websites, and they might have what your looking for! I hope I have been helpful in assisting you, Darlene! Agape love, Shirley!😀
      · 1 reply
    • SpiritualSister 24

      2024"Enter Into God's Rest" Circuit Assembly! 
      · 0 replies
    • Janice Lewis  »  T.B. (Twyla)

      Hello Twyla, when will the weekly study material be available. I am a member.
      Janice Lewis     lewisjanice84@gmail.com
      Thank you
      · 1 reply
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,693
    • Most Online
      1,797

    Newest Member
    Gardeniableu
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.