The Russian Defense Ministry says the US missile strike on a Syrian airfield wasn't very effective, with only 23 out of 59 Tomahawk missiles reaching their target. The locations of the remaining 36 missiles’ impact is now unknown, the ministry added.
The context here is making a decision to disassociate or not disassociate as an ADULT, therefor making an informed dcision about disassociation and knowing the implications will be shunning. As regards baptism, he was saying that this applies to baptised persons, who know that once baptised, you can get disfellowshipped or disassociate (for whatever reason) on the contrary, those who are not baptised cannot get disfellowshipped or disassociate regardless of age. So as a (baptised) ADULT person (regardless of when you got baptised) and a victim of child sexual abuse, you will know that "the consequences of disassociating yourself will be shunning". THAT was the point being made. It had nothing to do with WHEN one gets baptised.
Notice this was omitted from thesubtitles which would have given the context of what he was talking about: "here is somebody, who as an adult, or approaching adulthoid is making that decission" (what decission? The decission to get baptised? NO we are talking about disassociation here, so the decision about disassociation, and being aware the consequences will be shunning) As he goes on: "that the consequences of disassociation will be shunning".
Omitting pertinent information which gives context is typical for those who want you to misunderstand.
I believe (if memory serves) that it was American Revolutionary War hero Nathan Hale that said "My country right or wrong... but MY COUNTRY!"
The Nazis also had that philosophy, as do we for OUR Spiritual Nation..
Remember, even David, the beloved of God, had to hide out when King Saul went nutso and was trying to kill him for his own selfish reasons ... and Saul was ACTIVELY ... the Annointed of Jehovah at the time.
I disagree. When they serve the cause of righteousness correctly, your statement is true ... when incompetence and ignorance and self serving aggrandizement is the law ... NO!
AND OF COURSE! we will have to pay whatever price levied.
That is the theme of the 2016 movie "Hacksaw Ridge" ... illegal orders do NOT have to be obeyed.
I agree that disfellowshipping is a necessary part of keeping the Congregations clean from the things you mentioned ... BUT ... can you imagine Jesus Christ doing it the way that it is practiced today?
... ONLY in a Monty Python movie reduced to the absurd.. or a Vatican horror movie such as the Hunchback of Notre Dame
Early "christians" also tortured people, and burned them at the stake to cleanse their souls with fire. TECHNICALLY, when a soldier uses a flamethrower against enemy soldiers, as the Americans did against the Japanese during the battle of Okinawa, it was NOT torture to burn someone alive ... because there was no INTENT to torture.
The nuances of that well recognized legal distinction is lost on those being burned to death.
Remember: Jesus Christ did not ruin the prostitute that was about to be stoned to death by the Elders of his day ... he said "Go your way, and sin no more ...".