Jump to content
The World News Media

Dear Librarian I have a JW neighbour who lets his dog to go out without any supervision. For what I see this dog goes in the streets looking for food. He must not feed him.Isn't this animal cruelty? How he can pretend to be a ministerial servant if he is


Isabella

Recommended Posts


  • Views 5.5k
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I would consider that animal cruelty.... however... remember that the cheeseburger I just ate was from a cow that was just minding his own business and chewing his cud not even a few days ago. Ko

(Is this really Isabella, or has she been hacked?)  Isn't it illegal Stateside to let your dog lose in the streets ?  Could cause a traffic accident.  It would be a Christian attitude for yo

Sigh….though it has nothing to do with anything in the thread, out of left field comes this gem from PSomH: “Neither the search nor the investigation produced any evidence that the Belgian Jeho

Posted Images

  • Member
2 hours ago, Isabella said:

Dear @The Librarian

I have a JW neighbour who lets his dog to go out without any supervision. For what I see this dog goes in the streets looking for food. He must not feed him. Isn't this animal cruelty? How this JW can pretend to be a ministerial servant if he is not taking care of his domestic animal? Prov. 12:10.

Mt. 18:15-17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
7 hours ago, Pudgy said:

Dogs are ALWAYS looking for food.  I should know.

You are presuming actions and motives without any understanding or facts.

Biddies be stirrin' the pot like an unthinking but jealous bot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 10/23/2021 at 11:34 AM, Isabella said:

Dear @The Librarian

I have a JW neighbour who lets his dog to go out without any supervision. For what I see this dog goes in the streets looking for food. He must not feed him. Isn't this animal cruelty? How this JW can pretend to be a ministerial servant if he is not taking care of his domestic animal? Prov. 12:10.

(Is this really Isabella, or has she been hacked?) 

Isn't it illegal Stateside to let your dog lose in the streets ?  Could cause a traffic accident. 

It would be a Christian attitude for you to go talk to him about it. @xero  has already made this point with a scripture. 

But from my viewpoint animal cruelty is the least of things to worry about with JW MinS & Elders. 

How can you be concerned about a dog, but not concerned about Child Sexual Abuse in the JW Org ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I would consider that animal cruelty.... however... remember that the cheeseburger I just ate was from a cow that was just minding his own business and chewing his cud not even a few days ago.

Korea and other countries actually have dog markets where dog is a delicacy.

As the world gets poorer, more desperate and hungry I think we shall see a lot more of this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

If you re-label everything you can invent scenarios out of thin air.

It's easier when your thinking is based on an agenda and does not require thinking of any level.

... like the first posting on this thread.

I personally prefer to think of eggs as boneless chicken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
23 hours ago, Isabella said:

Dear @The Librarian

I have a JW neighbour who lets his dog to go out without any supervision. For what I see this dog goes in the streets looking for food. He must not feed him. Isn't this animal cruelty? How this JW can pretend to be a ministerial servant if he is not taking care of his domestic animal? Prov. 12:10

Believe it or not, some in people actually do this - it is a rule of thumb for well trained dogs for some, even for cats, although some dogs/cats do eat in the home, sometimes they eat outside of the home as well (i.e. Cats hunt food also), so this person's dog who eats outside of the home, mainly due to the fact the dog is able to return to said home, should not be an issue. As for animal cruelty for a well trained animal, no, unless if the dog does not look weak and feeble, has injuries, looks unkept, etc, then I would not say animal cruelty, unless if it is visual present. Now a dog that does not really eat in the home can and will often times he hostile outside of the home towards other animals/people, and when there is food pretend, they can get violent towards said person/animal. Granted there is no indication that this is the case in regards to your statement, it is unlikely and the latter is true for an American raised domestic animal.

That being said, a dog that is well trained can be left unsupervised in some cases, noticed I said well trained, for a well trained dog if is is not in the home can handle itself, even return to said home, likewise with cats

image.png

https://shopus.furbo.com/blogs/knowledge/how-long-can-you-leave-a-dog-home-alone

Now if he had an unkept dog that is put in a dog fight like setting, that that rules animal cruelty.

2 hours ago, The Librarian said:

I would consider that animal cruelty.... however... remember that the cheeseburger I just ate was from a cow that was just minding his own business and chewing his cud not even a few days ago.

Korea and other countries actually have dog markets where dog is a delicacy.

As the world gets poorer, more desperate and hungry I think we shall see a lot more of this.

It would depends if there is evidence of the dog being unkept, etc. Granted it isn't a dog in a feral like state and well trained, the latter is ok.

As for cows, yes, people eat the meat of the cows, bones even, however, it comes down to how the cows and chickens are treated. A farmer can raise a cow well vs a famer who brutalizes and abuses a cow, and there is a difference; another factor is a use of drugs and hormones on said animals, to which many people, the US and the UK being big consumers, do not pay attention to this factor and consume without question.

As for Korea, this is true, however in some Asian countries there is a far more darker aspect in regards to such markets, some of which are quite unclean. At times if your pet dog goes missing, there is a high chance it may end up in said market, and depending on the owner of said market they can abuse the dog, drug it, etc. hence Animal Cruelty. This is why in some Asian countries, owners are very critical with supervision of their pet dogs and cats compared to that of the US and UK.

 

That being said, the biggest form of cruelty towards animals, in the realm of animal abuse is what Big Pharma does to animals, dogs are not spare, and those hidden labs some of them have that is straight out of the 1950s is quite diabolical, for I have seen abandon Labs of Big Pharma and labyrinth of cages and testing areas that are something straight out of some Alien Si-Fi, it isn't nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
2 hours ago, The Librarian said:

I would consider that animal cruelty.... however... remember that the cheeseburger I just ate was from a cow that was just minding his own business and chewing his cud not even a few days ago.

... that is what happens when cows don't have guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
12 minutes ago, Pudgy said:

I personally prefer to think of eggs as boneless chicken.

Just be careful to not eat eggs. Eating it in front of the wrong person can warrant physical altercations. Or chicken sandwiches. No one would want to lose their life over a chicken sandwich; especially in London.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
4 minutes ago, Space Merchant said:

That being said, the biggest form of cruelty towards animals, in the realm of animal abuse is what Big Pharma does to animals, dogs are not spare, and those hidden labs some of them have that is straight out of the 1950s is quite diabolical, for I have seen abandon Labs of Big Pharma and labyrinth of cages and testing areas that are something straight out of some Alien Si-Fi, it isn't nice.

Before I was rescued by my current Guardian (... a Rambo story of note ...), I spent some time in a cage at a cosmetics research laboratory, watching the humans day after day experiment with various lipsticks on pigs.

...it did make them  look better, but oddly enough, resemble to a great degree Hillary Clinton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
59 minutes ago, Space Merchant said:

A farmer can raise a cow well vs a farmer who brutalizes and abuses a cow,

You know, you TRY to raise a cow well, but sometimes it's like talking to a dumb beast, but like cats, they will all come to see a red laser dot on the ground at dusk, which sometimes leads to their undoing....

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
    • In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some.
    • Would it be too much to ask what was the bible students starting point of creation?
    • @JW Insider Your summary is irrelevant, as I do not make any assertions regarding BC/AD other than their usage by scholars and in history, as you yourself have also acknowledged on numerous occasions, thus rendering your point invalid and evasive. The Watchtower leverages external viewpoints, including secular evidence, to substantiate the accuracy of their chronological interpretations. There are numerous approaches to dating events. Personally, I explore various alternative methods that lead to the same conclusion as the Watchtower. However, the most captivating approach is to utilize secular chronology to arrive at the same outcome. By relying solely on secular chronology, the pattern still aligns, albeit with a distinct interpretation of the available data. Nevertheless, the ultimate result remains unchanged. This is why when you get upset, when you are proven wrong, you, Tom, and those with the authority to ban take action, because you like others cannot handle the truth. In this case, your infamous tablet VAT 4956 has become useless in this situation. I do agree with you on one thing: you are not an expert, just like COJ. However, I must admit that this foolish individual was not the first to debate the chronology with the Watchtower and abandon it based on personal beliefs. He simply happened to be the most recent one that's on record.
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.