Jump to content
The World News Media

God's Sacred and Holy Name...

BroRando

By BroRando
in Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Member
Pudgy Grand Master

Pudgy

Posted
  • Member
Posted
1 hour ago, BroRando said:

How do you pronounce Jesus, Isaiah, or Elijah? 

Are you now going start claiming that the Jews don't exist and there was no such thing as the Holocaust?

You know, I am just a cartoon dog, two dimensional, but your comment BroRando, is a clear example of a one dimensional comment that has absolutely ZERO relevance to what Witness mentioned in the "Divine Name" brochure.

You may as well have stated "Entrails in the middle of the highway can't speak!".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 3.7k
  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Pudgy

You know, I am just a cartoon dog, two dimensional, but your comment BroRando, is a clear example of a one dimensional comment that has absolutely ZERO relevance to what Witness mentioned in the "Divi

Pudgy

Since we are talking about stuff like this ... just a passing note ..... A lot of people know the story of the Three Wise Men who visited the stable in Bethlehem, and gave gifts to the baby

Pudgy

As usual BroRando, you have COMPLETELY misunderstood what I said .... BECAUSE ... you never read anything in context, and it appears you are completely unfamiliar with the Society's publication "The D

Posted Images

  • Member
BroRando Mentor

BroRando

Posted
  • Author
  • Member
Posted
25 minutes ago, Pudgy said:

You know, I am just a cartoon dog, two dimensional, but your comment BroRando, is a clear example of a one dimensional comment that has absolutely ZERO relevance to what Witness mentioned in the "Divine Name" brochure.

You may as well have stated "Entrails in the middle of the highway can't speak!".

But the "J' you can't use a "J' what sounds it make.  No Jews, No Eijah, No Jesus, No Jehovah,.

Remember it's all about how they pronounce of the "J"... is it Jah or Jee, or Jay? 

Pure Demonic Deception.  Then STOP using the "J"  altogether.

Pointing the finger.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Member
BroRando Mentor

BroRando

Posted
  • Author
  • Member
Posted
6 hours ago, Pudgy said:

 

 

7 hours ago, BroRando said:

But the "J' you can't use a "J' what sounds it make.  No Jews, No Eijah, No Jesus, No Jehovah,.

Remember it's all about how they pronounce of the "J"... is it Jah or Jee, or Jay? 

Pure Demonic Deception.  Then STOP using the "J"  altogether.

Pointing the finger.jpg

 

 

7 hours ago, Pudgy said:

You know, I am just a cartoon dog, two dimensional, but your comment BroRando, is a clear example of a one dimensional comment that has absolutely ZERO relevance to what Witness mentioned in the "Divine Name" brochure.

You may as well have stated "Entrails in the middle of the highway can't speak!".

I notice how you Pudgy, Witness and Patiently waiting for Truth all to have the same tendancy.  I don't buy the lie that they are Christian, they reject Jesus claiming there is no "J" in Hebrew. Get the demonic teaching? 

No Jehovah. No Jesus. No Jerusalem, No Jews. Hitler thought the same way that was propagated by the Catholic Church.

The white supremacist Adolf Hilter bought into the Catholic teaching about the letter "J" and all three of you denounce Jehovah because his name starts with a "J" so you then you twist and turn like snakes and now claim it's about the prouncation? That's a cowawds way out. So you reject the "J" and use decption pushing the satanic lie that there is No Jehovah. No Jesus. No Jerusalem, No Jews. 

Hitler thought the same way that was propagated by the Catholic Church. Except taking special note of No Jews.  White Supremacy started to spawn it's Catholic Roots in killing off the Jews simply because of the agruement you three agree with.  Yet, you have no problem being a Hyprocite and using the Name JESUS, all the while denounce that it means 'Jehovah is Salvation.'

I would bet if all three of youe were investigated, we would find the common denominator of whites supremacy.  No Jheovah, No Jesus, No Jews. You deserve what you get at Armegeddon.

 

Exposing the real Roman Catholic Church: Roman Catholic ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Member
Pudgy Grand Master

Pudgy

Posted
  • Member
Posted

As usual BroRando, you have COMPLETELY misunderstood what I said .... BECAUSE ... you never read anything in context, and it appears you are completely unfamiliar with the Society's publication "The Divine Name".  THAT was the context you ignored.

When that happens you draw conclusions that get MORE wrong as the conversation goes on, as the error is not just additive, but multiplied.

.... please go back and re-read what I, and Witness  actually said, instead of your current screwed up perception of what we actually did say.

That is why in the 7th grade they used to teach how to diagram sentences .... a highly valuable tool for determining what a statement is REALLY saying.

Because you got what Witness' statement completely wrong, I am a white Supremacist?

Gimme a break!

( an aside to the 4th wall: Of the 9 billion people on this Earth, not a single one is equal to anyone else ... and that's a fact!)

Whether someone accepts or denies the Holocaust is COMPLETELY irrelevant to accepting or denying the letter J, or other silly premises.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Member
Pudgy Grand Master

Pudgy

Posted
  • Member
Posted
3 hours ago, BroRando said:

I would bet if all three of youe were investigated, we would find the common denominator of whites supremacy.

..... how about $2,000?

If I lose, I will pay you in Pudgycoin!, the Digital Currency preferred by the two-dimensional.

If you lose, as you are three dimensional,  U.S. Dollars will be just fine!

I present as evidence.... my photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pudgy
      A Proclamation on Transgender Day of Visibility, 2024

      By Pudgy · Posted

      … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • Mic Drop
      The Ethereum Cryptocurrency Scam

      By Mic Drop · Posted

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  

  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.