JWs sue Norwegian government

[Pudgy]

Everything you have just said, Georgie, is based on false premises, and personal delusion, and predilection for irrelevancy.

Do you even READ this stuff after you write it?

 

[BTK59]

8 hours ago, George88 said:

Once more, we encounter the perspective of someone consumed by hatred. I can't help but question whether this person would have objected if Jesus and his apostles had confronted the unjust actions of the ruling authorities of their time. In this instance, I am inclined to support the GW translation.

It appears that the disfellowshipped person has adopted a new persona, as the previous one was so effective that it was disregarded by the rational. Can't wait to place that person on the ignore list, lol!

It's amusing how arrogance cunningly distorts the narrative to create an illusion of moral superiority, when in reality, they are actually in the lowest position.

Whoops! Already have, lol!

[Pudgy]

10 hours ago, Pudgy said:

Everything you have just said, Georgie, is based on false premises, and personal delusion, and predilection for irrelevancy.

Do you even READ this stuff after you write it?

One thing you got goin’ for you, Georgie/ BTK, you are consistent !

 

[Srecko Sostar]

14 hours ago, George88 said:

Once more, we encounter the perspective of someone consumed by hatred. I can't help but question whether this person would have objected if Jesus and his apostles had confronted the unjust actions of the ruling authorities of their time. In this instance, I am inclined to support the GW translation. Mark 11:27-33, Luke 20:1-8

I am not convinced by the idea that Jesus would confront the Roman authorities. Just the opposite. Jesus repeatedly clashed with the Jew Religious Leaders of his time, and this is a model for today's JWs, who should face their GB.
Paul was a kind of "smart guy" of the Pharisee type who confronted the Roman authorities by referring to his "rights as a Roman citizen". Are JWs "Roman Citizens"?

[Srecko Sostar]

COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLE: “JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN NORWAY: WHY THE OSLO DISTRICT COURT IS WRONG”

Av Rolf Furuli 8. March 2024

 

https://mybelovedreligion.no/2024/03/08/comments-on-the-article-jehovahs-witnesses-in-norway-why-the-oslo-district-court-is-wrong/

[BTK59]

52 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLE: “JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN NORWAY: WHY THE OSLO DISTRICT COURT IS WRONG”

Apostate mentally: The prevalence of ad hominem arguments among apostates is not only foolish, but also deeply offensive. These individuals seem to believe that their arguments are not insulting, when in fact, they are far more damaging than mere insults. It is truly disheartening to witness such a misguided and intellectually feeble tactic employed by apostates and the disfellowshipped.

ERRONEOUS ARGUMENTS AND WRONG CLAIMS:
In this case, it is indeed true. By whose standards can a critic believe that the wrong argument is being made? Who are these people, and why should Witnesses care about their opinion?

The other points about the court system infringing on religious bylaws are quite reasonable.

A compelling example is the recent dispute involving the Catholic nun, Baudin de la Valette, which prompted the Pope to make an exception and write a letter of complaint to the French government. The issue arose from the French court's decision to unilaterally decide who can and cannot be excommunicated, disregarding the religious bylaw and instead yielding to public opinion.

Thanks, Srecko. Your new badge of recognition just proves that more foolishness coming from apostates is rewarded by Satan's influence.

[Pudgy]

That is the best example of egocentric arrogant word salad I have read since … um … Ever!.

NO ONE on this planet cares obout what you percieve as an insult, or are disheartened about … except you.

…  maybe your Mom.

Governments do what governments do … THEY have the bayonets. Get used to it.

If you accept their money, it’s “the golden rule”.

“Dem dat gota da gold, maka da rules”

 

[Srecko Sostar]

1 hour ago, BTK59 said:

These individuals seem to believe that their arguments are not insulting, when in fact, they are far more damaging than mere insults.

You want to say that only those arguments with which you agree are acceptable (to you)?
Yes indeed, a good argument. Who wouldn't accept it. lol

Is this an insult?

 

[BTK59]

2 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

You want to say that only those arguments with which you agree are acceptable (to you)?
Yes indeed, a good argument. Who wouldn't accept it. lol

Is this an insult?

Once I encounter an unbiased assessment from an apostate, I will genuinely consider their opinion. So far, I have yet to come across such an assessment from apostates or the disfellowshipped. Instead, I've witnessed a multitude of baseless and distorted lies, where they twist the truth to suit their own narrative. However, it appears that this site serves its purpose well, which seems to be spreading disinformation.

So, when you blaspheme against God, it is indeed highly offensive. Scripture doesn't see it any other way.

The current perception of this site as a right-wing disinformation platform for conspiracy theorists is not surprising, given its present state of factual inaccuracies.

It is unfortunate that certain individuals taint the spiritual nourishment shared by others through the existence of both closed clubs and open forums. If I were the proprietor, I would opt to close the open forum and subsequently dissolve the closed club, merging them into a single entity. This would allow individuals, regardless of whether they presently identify as Jehovah's Witnesses or have previously done so, whether they are disfellowshipped or disenchanted, to freely express their apostasy and disinformation. This approach would effectively confine their deviations from the truth, maintaining the privacy they deserve.

Therefore, individuals such as myself would not be granted access, since it would be an exclusive club with strict membership criteria. However, the public wouldn't see their nonsense thus having no need for them to see any criticism, even though they claim the right to critique others without any objections. Quite ironic, isn't it?

[Pudgy]

You, BTK, are so divorced from reality it’s truly amazing your brain has enough intact circuitry to make your legs work. 

Two words describe the entirety of your written opinions:

Egocentric narcissism.

[Srecko Sostar]

8 hours ago, BTK59 said:

The current perception of this site as a right-wing disinformation platform for conspiracy theorists is not surprising, given its present state of factual inaccuracies.

It is unfortunate that certain individuals taint the spiritual nourishment shared by others through the existence of both closed clubs and open forums. If I were the proprietor, I would opt to close the open forum and subsequently dissolve the closed club, merging them into a single entity. This would allow individuals, regardless of whether they presently identify as Jehovah's Witnesses or have previously done so, whether they are disfellowshipped or disenchanted, to freely express their apostasy and disinformation. This approach would effectively confine their deviations from the truth, maintaining the privacy they deserve.

Therefore, individuals such as myself would not be granted access, since it would be an exclusive club with strict membership criteria. However, the public wouldn't see their nonsense thus having no need for them to see any criticism, even though they claim the right to critique others without any objections. Quite ironic, isn't it?

In such a future of yours, the original JWs could have two sources of information; official WTJWorg site and Court Documents. They wouldn't watch these others because GB would declare it "hostile reading". lol

[BTK59]

1 hour ago, Srecko Sostar said:

In such a future of yours, the original JWs could have two sources of information; official WTJWorg site and Court Documents. They wouldn't watch these others because GB would declare it "hostile reading".

Why would a rational person bother trying to argue against the perception that these news forums are nothing but right-wing conspiracy theorist trash news, when people from around the world, including news outlets, already label them as such? You consistently confirm the validity of that concept. If witnesses seek truthful and dependable news about the persecution of governments against the Watchtower, similar to the Roman's treatment of first century Christians, they would not have relied on the Pharisees who were aligned with Rome for the news. 😁