JWs sue Norwegian government

[Pudgy]

I stipulated here 4 years ago my mugshot and arrest. You are beating a dead horse because that’s the only horse you HAVE.

You LIED about any convictions and sentencing, which never happened.

Ask yourself, why four years later, I am still at home, I go anywhere I want to go, with no geographic restrictions, eat at Golden Corral three to five times a week with my wife, and attended the Memorial March 24. 

You lie about EVERYTHING!

That is a PROVEN fact.

You are a pompous bat-crap crazy blowhard.

You prove that yourself with EVERY POST!

With your continuous assistance, I am merely documenting it for posterity.

…. and now … from your insane perspective …. I will NOW “allow” Srecko Sostar to say a few words….

 

[Pudgy]

My guess you are institutionalized in an Asylum somewhere and are mad and jealous, BTK59.

It may be just a guess, but it fits the dialog.

[BTK59]

Was I referring to your plea deal that was ultimately dismissed or will be dismissed, considering that the date of February 2023 is not four years ago, but rather a recent no bill? It's important to note that this dismissal does not erase your record or the charges that were brought against you. A dismissal does not automatically expunge your arrest record, especially on felony charges. If your lawyer told you, he/she could, you were taken for a ride. Felony records stay with you forever.

If you want people to believe that you are innocent of the crime, the dismissal alone does not prove it. It simply indicates that you managed to persuade a lawyer to argue that you are an elderly person with health issues, and the court took that into consideration. Therefore, the information still stands as an indictment of your behavior.

Who cares if you're confidently at home? "True No Bill" is simply another way of expressing superseding charges. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain your focus on these matters. I wouldn't be surprised if this type of content about children was forbidden to you with certain conditions. Why would a blogger ignore it? That is a choice.
 

Your credibility is nonexistent.

[Pudgy]

My credibility is 100%, assuming sane, rational people. 

You haven’t the slightest clue.

Every time you resort to incoherent guesses as a diversion, it emphasizes that you maliciously lied.

Your above post proved it once again … with your own testimony to betray you.…. as a malicious liar.

…. and with that, I consign you to argue with yourself, BTK59.

[JW Insider]

@BTK59 ( @George88 ) ( @BillyTheKid-55 ) ( @Allen Smith ) ( @AllenSmith35 ), etc., etc., etc., etc. --

and @Pudgy ( @James Thomas Rook Jr. ),

I once got in trouble from an Admin here for revealing that @TrueTomHarley was from Rochester, based on the assumption that I had used a moderator's ability to read I.P. addresses. I got out of trouble by showing that TTH had himself made posts claiming he was from Rochester.

It is considered very bad forum etiquette to reveal information or attempt to reveal personal information about a forum participant that isn't something they bring up about themselves. If it is specifically to reveal something negative, it is clearly malicious. Because it also goes against the rules of the forum, BTK59 and his cohorts might end up getting banned. I don't want to see BTK banned, for all the reasons I've stated before: 

• Banning is meaningless on a forum like this one, because anyone can come back under a different name.
• Banning is a form of shunning, which can have serious and unintended psychological consequences.
• Banning can involve erasing all of a person's writing here, into which they may have put a lot of time and research.
• Banning a person who shows signs of maliciousness and viciousness and paranoia usually will motivate the person to come back only to seek vengeance on everyone they think was involved in their "excommunication" or "disfellowshipping" from the forum. In practice that has meant attacks on persons who were not even interested in the matter. 

So, for these reasons, I recommend the following so that BTK and cohorts are not banned. I recommend that the posts related to the malicious attempt to expose personal legal issues and troubles be removed.

I will remove all related posts within 24 hours, unless both parties to this matter request that they remain. 

[Pudgy]

… a good, common sense solution. The time has already been wasted and is gone, and … uh …

[Srecko Sostar]

Massimo Introvigne is a lobbyist for WTJWorg. So it's interesting to hear how an ex-JW from Norway comments on this lobbyist that WTJWorg likes to use for its defense. The most interesting is the new thesis of GB in which it creates a categorization of former members. According to their latest instruction, you can greet a former member (but only to a limited extent, without socialization) who wants to come to a meeting in KH. But another "type", labeled as "apostate" of ex-JW should not be welcomed.

So, GB sinks deeper and deeper into their instructions that "make sense only from their point of view", while ordinary JWs mostly cannot understand them, but are obliged to obey, because these are the "last days".

 

 

[Pudgy]

Politics, optics, and money.

Politics, optics, and money.

… and whenever you think something else is involved, it’s

Politics, optics, and money.

[BTK59]

I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. It is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.

Can you tell me about Allen Smith and why you added that person? Were you responsible for ejecting that individual from the forum, as a biased hypocrite?

Do not pretend to be sympathetic when you are aware that God sees your actions and behavior, JWI

So, when I get kicked out, delete all my posts, Tom, JWI.

[BTK59]

23 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

The most interesting is the new thesis of GB in which it creates a categorization of former members. According to their latest instruction, you can greet a former member (but only to a limited extent, without socialization) who wants to come to a meeting in KH. But another "type", labeled as "apostate" of ex-JW should not be welcomed.

Well, this depends on how you view repentance. Why would anyone want to associate with such a negative person who is a hardcore apostate with evil intentions and no chance of redemption? Indeed, there is no thesis involved, only the application of common sense.

29 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

So, GB sinks deeper and deeper into their instructions that "make sense only from their point of view", while ordinary JWs mostly cannot understand them, but are obliged to obey, because these are the "last days".

God's people need to understand the scheme of things, but apostates do not. 

[Pudgy]

I can honestly say in my 77 years on this Earth I have never run across such a whiney, self-centered arrogant personality as yours BTK59.  

Perhaps it’s a good idea you don’t tell us more about yourself.

It might erode the image of yourself you have so carefully cultivated here.

[Pudgy]

I suspect there are a lot of mislabeled “apostates” (actually heretics) that are not evil in any way whatsoever. Honorable men and women in a tough spot.

They just expect their religion to be as advertised, and not demand something that is flat, be recognized as being round.

Remember what just recently occurred ….

It was those nasty evil “apostates” incessantly hammering on the Watchtower for 60 years about beards that created the Liberty and Freedom the Brotherhood now enjoys.

It was like tightly compressed spring being released!

Defend TRUTH, and wonderful things happen.