Jump to content
The World News Media

If Armageddon happened how would we all be killed?


Jack Ryan

Recommended Posts


  • Views 4.1k
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

@Witness He may be referring to haters of God, which was the case with enemies of God as seen in the Old Testament, examples like Gideon to both Zebah and Zalmunna, both of them who clearly were not f

I do not understand how Anyone could believe in the pagan doctrine of the trinity. It truly is Not Biblical.

Would we just drop dead? Would it be painful? Would we suffer? Would we know? If we die wouldn’t our sins be forgiven anyways cause if not that makes god a liar. No one ever talked About how we would

Posted Images

  • Member

NÃO SE PREOCUPE COM ISSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No Armagedon, aqueles que ridicularizam a promessa de Deus, onde os fiéis viverão para sempre num paraíso terrestre fazendo a vontade Dele, e ainda por cima fazem hoje uma oposição renhida à Sua vontade, "poderão" perder o privilégio de viver aqui na Terra para todo o sempre! 

JÁ É HORA DE VOCÊ CAIR NA REALIDADE!!!! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 hours ago, Querotevernoparaiso said:

JÁ É HORA DE VOCÊ CAIR NA REALIDADE!!!! 

Maybe he IS finally falling into reality.  Armageddon is fought in the valley of DECISION; the time period where both truth and deceitful lies are presented. 2 Thess 2:9-12  It is the making up of one's mind to love one or the other, and the ultimate judgment of each one of us, when we face Christ.     Joel 3:14;   Dan 7:9,10,22; John 5:22

2 Pet 3:7 -  But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Jer 23:29 - “Is not My word like a fire?” says the Lord,
“And like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?

Any casualties are the resulting influence Satan has over this world. 1 John 5:19   Doesn't he already perform that now?  Out of rage of losing his earthly kingdom, who knows what he'll do.  Rev 12:11,7,8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@Witness He may be referring to haters of God, which was the case with enemies of God as seen in the Old Testament, examples like Gideon to both Zebah and Zalmunna, both of them who clearly were not fans of God and were quick to mock, resulting in Gideon taking his blade to take them both out himself instead of Jether, Gideon's firstborn doing it himself. And of course there will also be a gnashing of the teeth and wailing of those who assume they are for God, but clearly ate out of the hands of falsehood.

As for the verses in question, John's vision is prophetic. The Angel of the Abyss is regarding the one called Satan the Devil and that part in what is also mentioned, in whole, points to Revelations 9:1 and 20:1-3.

 

That being said, for anyone who does not read Portuguese, what @Querotevernoparaiso said is the following:

DO NOT WORRY ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In Armageddon, those who ridicule God's promise, where believers will forever live in an earthly paradise doing His will, and today make strong opposition to His will, "may" lose the privilege of living here on earth for all the time!

IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO FALL INTO REALITY !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
26 minutes ago, BillyTheKid46 said:

Nice! it's refreshing to find someone that understands scripture. Unlike Portuguese, we use google translate for that, and we use linguists to make sense of ancient writings. It doesn't matter just about anything else, but an interpretation is a must.

Agreed, also I actually did use Google Translate for that one, if it was French or Spanish I wouldn't have a need for it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@BillyTheKid46 French is my birth language, but some of my family speaks Spanish also, so I have 2 languages including English, which I find easy to learn granted at the time my family had already moved to the US. I know other languages too, but I'd give myself a 5 out of 10 for them, but for Greek and Hebrew, I do not speak it, but I can understand a bit of both in terms of writing and some words and language forms, the Hebrew was a bit of self-teaching though and learned a bit more from a man named Jeff A. Benner, a Hebrew Professor and Researcher.

For Bible Translations I mainly use the ESV version, secondary being the AS, and on rare occasions the YLT and or NIV.

As for the other things mentioned, I'd have to look into them, but I do dwell heavily on Biblical Hermeneutics.

That being said, the google translation is indeed a good tool when it comes to seeing what someone is saying, although it isn't always correct. And as for the verses in question, examples from the Bible are clear and understood when brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@James Thomas Rook Jr. 

Qual é mesmo a pergunta? 

EU NÃO ENTENDI!!! Nem usando o Google translate! 

Acho que... o problema do mau entendimento, NÃO FOI DO TRANSLATE DO GOOGLE!!! 

MAS SIM... da sua infeliz tentativa em comparar algo que vai ser bom para a humanidade, assim como foi prometido, com os filmes de ficção que ridicularizam esta magnífica promessa de Deus :

* Não haverá mais morte, guerras, fome, doenças, catástrofes, etc...etc.. 

A HUMANIDADE VIVERÁ NA TERRA EM CONDIÇÕES PARADISÍACAS!!!! 

Eu... se fosse você... não gozava com o aviso prévio do nosso Criador, porque o que promete Jeová, CUMPRE!!! 

JÁ ESTÁ MAIS DO QUE NA HORA DE VOCÊ LEVAR A SÉRIO A PALAVRA DELE!!! 

NÃO ESTAMOS NO TEMPO PARA BRINCADEIRAS!!! 

RETORNE, RETORNE, RETORNE PARA JEOVÁ DE TODO O SEU CORAÇÃO!!! 

 

Mas cada cabeça sua sentença! 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
Obrigado por seu conselho ... mas muitos dos meus comentários são 
o que chamamos em inglês "tongue in cheek", ou seja, uma piada
leve e sutil com algum elemento de verdade.

Eu suspeito que isso não se traduza bem em outros idiomas sem um
especialista muito real em ambos os idiomas, que tenha senso de
 humor e entenda o humor em ambos os idiomas.

É claro que, para o humor ser engraçado, deve conter ALGUM 
elemento de verdade.

Thank you for your advice .... but a LOT of my comments are what we call in English "tongue in cheek", that is to say a subtle light hearted joke with some element of truth.


I suspect this does not translate well into other languages without a very real expert in both languages, who has a sense of humor, and understands the humor in both languages.


Of course, for humor to be funny, it must contain SOME element of truth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@James Thomas Rook Jr. @James Thomas Rook Jr. 

The joke lies in the incredulity of the people in the real amargedon because of the movies that speak of it?

Do not even understand this English humor?? 

MAS o seu português está excelente!!!  É de certeza melhor do que o meu inglês do Google!  ?

SERÁ QUE A SUA AMABILIDADE PODERIA EXPLICAR-ME A PIADA EM PORTUGUÊS? 

Obrigada! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

The only joke I know in Portugese is this one:
A rabbi, a Priest and a Muslim Cleric walk into a bar mitzvah,

and the bartender asks if they brought their Hippopotomus. 

 

A única piada que conheço em português é essa:
Um rabino, um padre e um clérigo muçulmano entram em um bar mitzvah,

e o garçom pergunta se trouxeram seu hipopótamo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.